Turkey: Ancillary Status Of Non-Compete Obligations In The Cement Sector: Issues Of Geographic Scope

In Turkey, non-compete obligations may be evaluated under the scope of "agreements that restrict competition" or "abusive conducts of dominant undertakings" (Article 4 and 6 of Law No. 4054 on Protection of Competition ("Law No. 4054"), akin to Article 101 and 102 of TFEU, respectively). However, non-compete obligations in mergers and acquisitions1 may benefit from the "ancillary restraints" regime. The Turkish Competition Board ("Board"), along with the other competition law authorities, allows certain non-compete obligations to be imposed on the sellers in in merger and acquisitions to the extent they are (i) directly related to and (ii) necessary for the implementation of the concentration.

This article investigates the geographical scope of non-compete obligations under the "ancillary restraints" regime2 based on the Board's precedents in cement sector.

Purpose: Implementation of the Concentration

The ancillary restraints regime seeks to enable the full effectiveness of a concentration. Non-compete obligations on the seller aim to ensure that the buyer acquires the target with its whole value, including non-material values such as its commercial reputation, know-how and customer portfolio.3,4 A non-compete obligation on the seller that helps fully implementing the projected outcome of the transaction must be limited in its (i) duration, (ii) geographical scope and (iii) subject matter in order to be deemed as directly related to and necessary for the implementation of the concentration.5

Direct Relevancy and Necessity Criteria

Equivalent to the Commission Notice on restrictions directly related and necessary to concentrations ("Notice"), the Turkish Competition Authority published the Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions ("Guidelines") (approved by the Board on May 3, 2011 and last amended on March 26, 2013). According to the Notice and the Guidelines, a restrictive clause is considered to be ancillary to the concentration only if the clause is directly relevant to the concentration and necessary for its implementation. The restrictive clause should be imposed on the seller from an economic perspective, in order to achieve smooth transition to the post-transaction structure.6

The necessity criterion requires an assessment on whether the restriction is necessary for the implementation of the concentration and whether without such restriction the concentration would result in uncertainty and cost increase.7 Ancillary restriction must just satisfy the proportionality test and must not go beyond what is necessary for the concentration.8 In order to determine whether a non-compete obligation is necessary to preserve or to transfer value in a particular transaction, its scope and term would also be assessed.9

The non-compete restrictions must also be limited in their duration, geographical scope and subject matter in order to be deemed as directly related to and necessary for the implementation of the concentration (and thus as an ancillary restraint).

Geographical Scope of Ancillary Restraints

According to the Notice, geographical field of the application should not exceed what the implementation of the concentration reasonably requires.10 To this end, the geographical scope of a non-compete restriction must be limited to the area in which the seller (target) has offered the contract good/s or service/s before the transfer.11 That geographical scope could be extended to territories which the seller (target) was about to enter at the time of the transaction, provided that it had already invested in preparation for this move.12

Turkish Competition Board's analysis and position on ancillary restraints in cement sector:

Prior to the enforcement of Communiqué No. 2010/4 on Mergers and Acquisition Requiring the Approval of the Competition Board ("Communiqué No. 2010/4"), the non-compete clauses were notified by the transaction parties and assessed by the Board. Therefore, the Board's reasoned decisions prior to the enforcement of Communiqué No. 2010/4 provide a better insight into the assessment of non-compete clauses and the extent to which such restraints could be accepted as ancillary to the concentration.

Recent reasoned decisions of the Board do not contain any analysis regarding ancillary restraints as upon the enforcement of Communiqué No. 2010/4, the "ancillary restraint" status of a non-compete obligation became an issue of self-assessment. The Board does not devote a separate part of its decision to the ancillary status of any restraint brought with the transaction.13 Therefore, the parties have to engage in self-assessment and evaluate whether the non-compete obligation could be considered as ancillary to the merger transaction. However, the transaction parties have to beware of the risk that in case they fail to correctly analyze the non-compete obligation, the agreement might fall under Article 4 (agreement, concerted practice) or Article 6 (abuse of dominant position) of Law No. 4054 and might create the risk of competition law violence, even in cases where the transaction was granted unconditional approval. As per Article 13 of Communiqué No. 2010/4, the Board's approval decision of the concentration will be deemed to cover only the directly related and necessary extent of restraints in competition brought by the transaction (e.g. non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality, etc.).

Particularity of Cement and Ready-to-Mix Concrete Cases

The Board's precedents indicate that the geographical scope of an ancillary restraint should be limited geographically to the "area of operation of the seller (target) before the transaction and its natural sales hinterland".14 As provided, the geographical scope of an ancillary restraint should be "directly related to and necessary for implementation of the concentration". In the assessment of non-compete obligations in merger and acquisition cases, the Board acknowledges the geographical scope as the locations of the target's facilities, where the target's activities are being carried out, and its natural sales hinterland as reasonable and necessary for the implementation of the transaction.

Some products or services may easily be provided nation-wide or even worldwide, whereas some other products, because of their material nature, may not easily reach distant territories. Cement and ready-mix-concrete set examples to the latter. In cement cases, relevant geographic market is mostly defined based on the locations of the target's facilities since the material nature of cement only allows undertakings to transport the product within a certain range, mostly in a 250-300 km radius. Similarly, ready to mix concrete freeze quickly; therefore, it can be transported approximately within a 50 km radius.

Region-wide Restriction

Many precedents of the Board in cement cases indicate that a non-compete obligation limited with the region where the target has activities could be considered as directly related and necessary. For example, in Baştaş/Aktaş15, the Board assessed the non-compete obligation on the sellers not to directly or indirectly conduct businesses competing with the target in Marmara Region for two years. The target operates in a few cities in Marmara Region and Central Anatolia Region. The parties stated that such a restriction is directly related to and necessary for the acquirer to create its own know-how and customer portfolio and penetrate into the Marmara Region. The Board concluded that the non-compete obligation does not restrict competition more than it is necessary in terms of the subject matter, person, geographical scope and term.16

In Limak/Şanlıurfa Madencilik17, the transaction agreement between the parties states that each seller agrees that neither itself nor any of its subsidiaries would conduct or invest in a new cement business, which would directly compete with the target in the southeastern region of Turkey, for 2 years as of the closing of the transaction. The target was active in five cities in the Southeastern Anatolia Region. In this decision, the scope of the non-compete clause was wider than the relevant geographic market definition. The Board considered the non-compete obligation as an ancillary restraint.

In Çimentaş/Elazığ Cement18, the Board assessed the non-compete clause by referring to the necessity criterion. It stated that the main purpose for the non-compete clause is to provide the buyer with the transfer of intangible assets, such as commercial reputation and know-how, to their fullest value. For this purpose, the buyer needs to be protected against the seller's competition until the buyer creates its own customer portfolio and fully benefits from the know-how acquired from the seller. The decision does not particularly contain any discussion regarding the geographical scope even though it was limited on the basis of region rather than cities. To this end, decision includes that Elazığ Cement's (target) main hinterlands regionally are East and Southeastern Anatolia Regions and partially East Black Sea Region. Decision provides a list of the cities in these regions where the target has activities, which amounts to 14 cities. The transaction agreement defines the geographical scope of the non-compete obligation as the "eastern part of Turkey".

Narrower Geographical Restriction

In addition to the approach explained above, there are some cases where the Board acknowledges city and even county based non-compete obligations separately for cement and ready to mix concrete relevant products.

In Çimpor/Yibitaş19, the share purchase agreement between the parties includes a non-compete clause which prevents the sellers and its affiliates to conduct directly or indirectly any continuous manufacturing or commercial operation in relation to the full range of cement, ready to mix concrete and aggregate in the markets in which YLOAÇ (target) provides services (18 cities mostly in Black Sea and Central Anatolia Regions). The Board considered the foregoing clause as ancillary restraint.20

In Cimpor Yibitaş/Tokbetsan21, according to the transaction agreement, the sellers would not be directly or indirectly conducting a ready to mix concrete business within the 30 km radius around the transferred facility for three years as of the date that Cimpor (acquirer) starts its operations in the said facility. The target's hinterland was a single city in Turkey where the acquirer has no ready to mix concrete activity. Since the restriction was found to have its effects only on the target, the non-compete obligation was assessed as an ancillary restraint.

In Lafarge/OYAK22, a Phase II decision, the geographical scope of the non-compete clause was found to be too comprehensive in the agreement. Therefore, the parties amended the agreement and limited the scope of the non-compete obligation on the basis of geographical market for each contract good (grey cement, ready-mixed concrete, and aggregate) as cities or as areas narrower than the cities (i.e. Asian side of Istanbul). Accordingly, the Board defined the possible widest areas for the non-compete obligation as "Kocaeli, Sakarya, Bolu, Düzce" for cement, "İstanbul, Kocaeli, Tekirdağ, Balıkesir" for ready to mix concrete and "Marmara region" for aggregate. The narrower geographical scope definitions of the parties for non-compete obligation was acceptable by the Board. In its assessment on the necessity criterion, the Board took notice of the fact that the acquirer was a new entrant in the market whereas the seller was a longstanding player. In order to protect the acquirer against the seller's competition in the relevant market for contract good/s or service/s, and considering the know-how transfer, the Board found the non-compete clause to be necessary, thus an ancillary restraint.


Assessment of a non-compete obligation as a "restrictive agreement" or as an "abusive conduct of a dominant undertaking" significantly differs from its assessment as an ancillary part of a concentration. Ancillary restraints should be directly related to and necessary for the implementation of the concentration; however, to the extent it exceeds this proportionality, it could be considered as an agreement among undertakings which has as its object or effect or likely effect to the directly or indirectly prevent, distort or restrict competition or as an abuse of dominant position in case the relevant undertakings are in a dominant position in the market. As seen above, and also referred to in the Notice and the Guideline, so long as a non-compete obligation is directly related and necessary for the implementation of the concentration, the pro-competitive effect or the object of such restriction could be left outside of this assessment.23 In an event, the prudent approach would be to limit the geographical scope of the non-compete obligation to the location/region where the target carries out its activities and to its natural hinterland when engaging in self-assessment for the ancillary restraints.


1. Article 7 of Law No. 4054.

2. Peter Roth QC, Vivien Rose, European Community Law of Competition, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, [2008], p. 793, para. 263.

3. Peter Roth QC, Vivien Rose, European Community Law of Competition, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, [2008], p. 795, para. 8.266.

4. Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions, para 52.

5. Ancillary Restraints Notice, para. 14.

6. Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions, para 50.

7. Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions, para 51.

8. F. Enrique Gonzalez Diaz, Notion of Ancillary Restraints Under EC Competition Law, Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 19, Issue 3, Article 8 [1995], p. 957.

9. Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions, para 51.

10. Ancillary Restraints Notice, para. 14.

11. Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions, para 56.

12. Guidelines on Undertakings Concerned, Turnover and Ancillary Restraints in Mergers and Acquisitions, para 56.

13. Article 13 of Communiqué No. 2010/4.

14. Cementeire Aldo Barbetti/Çimko, 07-37/398-157, 3.5.2007.

15. Baştaş/Aktaş, 07-53/595-201, 20.6.2007.

16. Also see. Denizli/CRH, 15.2.2007, 07-14/117-36.

17. Limak/Şanlıurfa Madencilik, 07-89/1130-441, 6.12.2007.

18. Çimentaş/Elazığ Çimento, 06-63/850-242, 14.9.2006.

19. Çimpor/Yibitaş, 07-14/118-37, 15.2.2007.

20. Also See ÇimSA/BHB, 2.6.2008, 08-36/481-169.

21. Cimpor Yibitaş/Tokbetsan, 27.6.2008, 08-41/557-210.

22. Lafarge/OYAK, 09-56/1338-341, 18.11.2009.

23. Ariel Ezrachi, EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases, [2014], s. 110.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions