Turkey: Investor vs. State Disputes Under ECT & Turkey’s Track-Record

The world's constantly growing energy demand and energy investments, requiring substantial capital and long-term commitments, which can be easily affected by political, legal and environmental changes, inevitably give rise to disputes between investors and the host states of investments. This is almost exactly why the Energy Charter Treaty (the "ECT")1 was signed in the 1990s. The ECT has an important role in international law. Its purpose is to establish an international legal framework, with a view to promote long-term cooperation in the energy field, on the basis of complementarity and mutual benefits, in accordance with the objectives and principles of the European Energy Charter. To date, 51 states, including Turkey,2 have signed the ECT and 47 of them3 have ratified it. With this large number of ratifying states under its umbrella, the ECT has the widest geographical scope in the field of energy investments.

I. Dispute Resolution under the ECT

The ECT stipulates in detail alternative dispute resolution methods for different types of disputes. When the ECT was negotiated, some of the relatively less developed countries did not have sufficiently developed local judicial systems and, for this reason, the more developed countries had concerns about the domestic courts' neutrality, professional competence and efficiency in these less developed countries. By providing alternative means of dispute resolution before international tribunals, the ECT contributes to increased confidence of investors. This is of particular relevance in the energy sector, as disputes may often be very complex and involve extremely large claim amounts.4

Although the ECT sets forth different resolution methods for different dispute types5, there are only two forms of binding dispute resolution:

  1. State vs. State arbitration, for all disputes under the ECT (excluding competition disputes and environmental disputes)
  2. Investor vs. State arbitration for investment disputes

In this article, we will focus on the dispute resolution system for investment disputes between investors and states.

II. Investor vs. State Disputes

Article 26 of the ECT provides the right to file a lawsuit against the host country, if the host country breaches its obligations arising from the ECT's investment promotion and protection related provisions (Part III of the ECT). If a dispute is not related to Part III of the ECT (e.g. a dispute arising from an investment in capital markets), Article 26 will not apply.

(a) Prior Consultations

Disputes between a contracting state (the host country) and an investor from another contracting state regarding the investment will be settled amicably, if at all possible. Both parties have three months for this consultation. If the parties cannot settle the dispute within this period of time, only the investor (not the contracting state) has the right to move on to the next stage.

(b) First Round of Selection

If settlement negotiations between the state and the investor fail, the investor will have three alternatives. The investor may refer the dispute in relation with the state's breach of its obligations regarding the promotion and protection of investment to:6

  1. the state's civil or administrative courts;
  2. any previously agreed dispute resolution procedure; or
  3. international arbitration.

(c) Second Round of Selection

If an investor chooses to refer the dispute to international arbitration, the applicable article is Article 26/4 of the ECT, setting forth three alternative platforms:

  1. The International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID")7, if the investor's state and the host country are both parties to the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (the "ICSID Convention"). If only one of them is a party to the ICSID Convention, the investor can apply to ICSID under the rules stipulated in the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of the Center.8
  2. Arbitration with a sole arbitrator or an ad hoc arbitral tribunal, established under the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).
  3. Arbitration under the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC).

(d) Contracting States' Unconditional Consent for International Arbitration and Exceptions

Under Article 26/3 of the ECT, each contracting state gives its unconditional consent for submission of a dispute to international arbitration. There are two exceptions to this unconditional consent:

  1. The states listed in Annex ID of the ECT do not provide their unconditional consent, where the investor has previously submitted the dispute to another dispute resolution forum under Article 26/2/(a) and Article 26/2/(b).9
  2. The states listed in Annex IA of the ECT do not provide their unconditional consent in relation to disputes arising within the scope of the last sentence of Article 10/1:10
"Each Contracting Party shall observe any obligations it has entered into with an Investor or an Investment of an Investor of any other Contracting Party."

As Turkey is one of the states listed in Annex ID, investors that previously presented their claim before Turkish courts, arbitral tribunals or any applicable previously agreed dispute resolution method cannot refer their disputes to international arbitration.

(e) Applicable Law – Finality of Awards – Enforcement of Awards

A tribunal, established under Article 26/4, will resolve the dispute in accordance with the ECT's provisions, applicable rules and the principles of international law.11 Arbitral awards, which may also include decisions on interest, are final and binding.12 Under Article 26/5/(b), any arbitration under Article 26 will, at any party's request, be held in a state that is a party to the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958 (New York Convention).

III. Exemplary Cases

The Energy Charter Conference Secretariat currently has record of over 30 investor vs. state cases brought to international arbitration.13 The first case under the ECT's dispute resolution methods was filed in April 2001. AES Summit Generation Limited brought a dispute against the Republic of Hungarybefore ICSID, due to an alleged breach of Article 13 of the ECT. The dispute arose from an electricity sale agreement and the claimant sought USD 300 million.

In an ICSID case between Plama Consortium Limited and the Republic of Bulgaria that arose from an oil refinery investment, the arbitral tribunal decided that Article 17/1 of the ECT14 provides the right for states to deny the advantages of the ECT for investors, which, despite having the nationality of another contracting state, does not conduct substantial business activities in its home country (so-called mailbox companies) and which are in fact owned or controlled by nationals of non-contracting states. The controversial conclusion in the Plama decision was that, in order for Article 17/1 to apply, a contracting state must exercise its "right to deny" in advance of a mailbox company making an investment in its territory and, if it does not, it may not be able to deny it later.

In an SCC case between Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB and the Republic of Latvia, which arose from an electricity sale agreement, the Swedish investor in a Latvian generation plant claimed that Latvia had unlawfully discriminated against it, by creating a tariff difference between Latvian generators and itself. The tribunal decided that Latvia could not explain the reason for this difference and had therefore breached the ECT's non-discrimination provisions. As a result, Latvia was ordered to pay compensation and the invertor's costs incurred in connection with the arbitration.

In another ICSID case between Azpetrol International Holdings B.V., Azpetrol Group B.V., Azpetrol Oil Services Group B.V. and the Republic of Azerbaijan in connection with oil and gas distribution, trade storage and transportation enterprises, the Dutch holding companies claimed over USD 300 million under the ECT. This case involved issues concerning:

  1. whether local investors are allowed to sue their own state in international proceedings through an offshore holding company; and
  2. how corruption allegations affect an investor's right to bring ECT claims.

The tribunal concluded that the parties had reached a binding settlement, that there was no legal dispute between the claimants and the respondent and that, consequently, it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Filing an international arbitration claim is the last resort for investors. However, the existence of this alternative forces contracting states to satisfy their obligations under the ECT and encourages investors to make more new investment.

IV. Turkey's Track-Record

There have been four ICSID cases initiated by investors against Turkey, under the ECT. Three of them have been concluded. The three concluded cases are closely related and borne out of one action, i.e. expropriation of investors' assets by Turkey.

(a) Libananco Holdings Co. Limited ("Libananco")

In the ICSID case15 with a claim amount of USD 10 billion, the Greek Cypriot company Libananco filed expropriation claims under the ECT. This claim was related to the seizure of shares of Çukurova Elektrik A.Ş. (ÇEAŞ) and Kepez Elektrik Türk A.Ş. (Kepez), the majority shares of which were allegedly ultimately owned by Libananco. According to Libananco, Turkey seized these companies' shares for political reasons, while, according to Turkey, these shares were seized for legal reasons. Turkey denied Libananco's "investor" status. In August 2011, the tribunal decided that it had no jurisdiction over the dispute, since Libananco did not prove that it owned the shares in ÇEAŞ and Kepez.16

(b) Cementownia "Nowa Huta" S.A.

In the ICSID case17 with a claim amount of USD 4.6 billion, the Polish company Cementownia initiated arbitration due to the seizure of ÇEAŞ's and Kepez's assets and the termination of two long-term electricity concession agreements of these companies. Turkey denied Cementownia's "investor" status as it did in the Libananco case, while Cementownia claimed that it acquired the shares prior to Turkey's action. In the award of September 2009, the tribunal dismissed the case in its entirety on the ground that Cementownia failed to prove that it owned or controlled an investment, in accordance with the ECT and that Cementownia's claim was fraudulent and was brought in bad faith. Cementownia was ordered to pay Turkey's legal fees, expenses and arbitral costs.18

(c) Europe Cement Investment and Trade S.A.

This ICSID case19 with a claim amount of USD 3.8 billion was very similar to Cementownia case. Turkey challenged the tribunal's jurisdiction, denying Europe Cement's investor status and Europe Cement could not prove its ownership over the shares. In the award of August 2009, the tribunal dismissed the case in its entirety due to lack of jurisdiction.20

(d) Alaplı Elektrik B.V.

In this ICSID case21 with a claim amount over USD 100 million, the Dutch company Alaplı had claims arising from an electricity generation concession agreement against Turkey under the ECT and the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the Netherlands and Turkey. The power plant, subject to the concession agreement, was never constructed. The tribunal rendered an award in July 2012. After the award, Alaplı applied for an annulment of the award. The annulment proceeding is still pending.

V. Concluding Remarks

As Turkey is a developing country and a natural bridge between energy-rich eastern countries and energy-demanding western countries, there will be many more energy investments in Turkey. Although the parties mostly conclude agreement(s) (i.e. bilateral investment treaties, intergovernmental agreements, and host-government agreements) for each energy project, issues that are not stipulated under these agreements will be governed by the ECT, as the ECT is part of Turkish legislation.


The ECT was signed on 17 December 1994 in Lisbon and entered into force on 16 April 1998.

2 Turkey signed the ECT on 17 December 1994 and ratified it on 6 February 2000.

3 Australia, Belarus, Iceland and Norway have not yet ratified the ECT.

4http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/ECT_Guide_ENG.pdf: The Energy Charter Treaty: A Reader's Guide, p. 51.

5 e.g. trade disputes, transit disputes, competition disputes, environmental disputes and investment disputes.

6 Article 26/2 of the ECT.

7 ICSID, established under the ICSID Convention signed at Washington on 18 March 1965 is an autonomous international institution, which has close relations with the World Bank.

8https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/facility/partA-article.htm : Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes(Additional Facility Rules).

9 There are 26 states (including Turkey) listed in Annex ID of the ECT.

10 There are four states listed in Annex IA of the ECT.

11 Article 26/6 of the ECT.

12 Article 26/8 of the ECT.

13 http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=269 : Energy Charter, Dispute Resolution.

14 "Each Contracting Party reserves the right to deny the advantages of this Part to: [...] a legal entity if citizens or nationals of a third state own or control such entity and if that entity has no substantial business activities in the Area of the Contracting Party in which it is organized; [...]"

15 ICSID Case No. ARB/06/8, registered on 19 April 2006.

16 http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Investor-State_Disputes/Award_-_Libananco_vs_Turkey.pdf : ICSID, Washington D.C., ICSID Case No. ICSID Case NO. ARB/06/8, AWARD.

© Kolcuoğlu Demirkan Attorneys at Law, 2014

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Gürhan Aydın
Burak Eryiğit
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions