Turkey: Termination Of Employment Contracts And Collective Dismissals As A Result Of Mergers In Turkey

Last Updated: 17 November 2011
Article by Levent Cengiz

I. Introduction

While mergers and acquisitions have considerable advantages in terms of efficiency, they may also lead to significant employment issues and carry potential liabilities for the merging parties, especially when they involve large group of employees. The parties can reduce the risk of claims and detrimental effects of such mergers by addressing the issues in the negotiation process. This article aims to provide our legal advice on how to manage such mergers in Turkey by analyzing the decisions of the Court of Cassation ("Supreme Court" or "Court") regarding this matter.

II. Termination of Employment Contracts

Article 18 of Labor Law No. 4857 states that the employer who terminates the employment contract of an employee must depend on a valid reason for such termination based on the operational requirements of the establishment. As "the operational requirements of the establishment" is a general concept and the facts and circumstances of the cases are different from each other, a case-by-case analysis is required for each merger. For this purpose, the summaries of Supreme Court decisions are examined below, as they provide guidance on this issue. However, before analyzing those decisions, the main principle in Labor Law should be emphasized: Termination of an employment contract is applied as a last resort (ultima ratio). In this respect, the Court examines whether the employer's actions are consistent with the termination and whether the termination is proportionate. The defense of the employer based on employment surplus ("surplus defense") is accepted as a valid reason by the Court provided that there is no less harmful option such as removing overtime work of other employees, offering the employee flexible working hours or providing him a proper training to employ him in another department. In addition, the burden of proof is on the employer.

One of its decisions,1 the Court did not accept the surplus defense after a merger, because the employer hired other employees with the same qualifications as the one whose contract was terminated. The Court also indicated that the employer did not consider employing him in another department. It was clear that the termination was not the last resort. The Court rejected the surplus defense for the same reason in another case regarding an acquisition of a retail store chain.2 Although the employer stated that the new employees were hired in the retail stores and not in the headquarters, the Court specified that the employee was not offered to be employed one of those retail stores. However, in another case,3 the Court accepted the surplus defense, because the employer had sought all other remedies apart from the termination in order to keep the employee, who was a department manager, in the workplace. After the merger, another employee was employed in that position and it was clear that only one employee was needed for such position. The employer then employed the manager in another department; however, after 9 months, it had become clear that a manager with those qualifications was not suitable for any position in the workplace. In other words, the termination was inevitable.

The Court made a detailed examination in its 4 decisions4 regarding the same bank merger. In these cases, the board of directors representing the merging parties issued a regulation indicating the new structure, departments, positions and job definitions. It also prepared a reorganization scheme stating that some of the departments had been abolished or downsized. Accordingly, the number of employees in the plaintiff's department, who was working as a guard before the termination, had been reduced and no guard was needed in that department any longer. However, the Court scrutinized the matter and decided that although it was proved that the employee's position was not needed in the new organization scheme; given that the workplace is a bank, the employer did not attempt employing him in another department considering his skills and education. To this end, the Court concluded that a legal expert specialized in the relevant sector should have been appointed to determine whether the employee could have been employed in another department of the bank. Only then, whether the termination was applied as a last resort could be determined.

A similar matter arose in another case regarding a merger of two associated companies belonged to the same group company. One of the merging companies, which was the company that the plaintiff was working for, was established to conduct the logistic services of all other companies in the group; however, it was decided 4 months before the merger that the logistic services would be conducted by separate units within each company in the group. The Court stated that although it was clear that there was employment surplus in that case, considering that (i) the employee in question was employed in and transferred to other associated companies in the past pursuant to the personnel regulation of the group company and (ii) the logistic services were continued to be carried out, termination of the employee's contract was not the last resort, as employing the employee in other associated companies had not been considered.5

It appears that, if the employer is a large organization like a group company or a bank, the Court strictly examines whether the employee could have been employed in another department.

One last issue regarding this matter is the abolishment of some of the departments and the procurement of those services from a subcontractor. In another case, although the Court ruled that the termination of the employment contract was not the last resort considering the facts of the case; it stated that, in principle, employment surplus caused by a duly established relationship between the principal employer and subcontractor who undertakes to carry out work in a certain section of the main activity is accepted as a valid reason to terminate an employment contract.6

III. Collective Dismissal

In case the merger requires the termination of the contracts of a large number of employees, the merging parties should handle the transactions delicately, as the legal consequences of the collective dismissal may be highly disruptive for the new organization. In this sense, the notifications and consultations should be performed pursuant to Article 29 of Labor Law. In addition, if there are some criteria indicated in a collective agreement or provided by the employer himself on how the elimination of the employees should be conducted, the employer should comply with such criteria. If there is not a collective agreement or any other document that binds the employer, it is on his discretion how to do such elimination.7

IV. Conclusion – Legal Advice

As it is seen above, the facts and circumstances of the cases are different from each other and a case-by-case analysis is required for each merger. However, considering the Supreme Court decisions provided above, the author is of the opinion that, in general, the merging parties should take the following steps:

  1. An corporate resolution regarding the procurement of some of the services from a subcontractor, abolishment of a department, etc. issued by the authorized body such as board of directors may be useful in case of a conflict. The economic reasons of the decision should also be clearly specified.
  2. A reorganization scheme along with a permanent staff (norm staff) study based on the corporate resolution should be issued. The scheme should clearly show the employment surplus and indicate how many employees are needed for each department. In addition, the qualifications required for each employee should be specified, especially when the merging parties intend to adapt their new organization to the latest technological developments.
  3. The merging parties must seek less harmful remedies such as removing overtime work of other employees, offering the employee flexible working hours or providing him a proper training to employ him in another department.
  4. Finally, Article 29 of Labor Law should be observed in case of a collective dismissal. If there is a collective agreement indicating the criteria on how to do the elimination, the employer must comply with those criteria. Otherwise, it is on his discretion how to conduct such elimination.


1. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2004/15527 E. See also Yargıtay 9. HD. 2004/16305 E.

2. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2007/26232 E.

3. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2005/11207 E.

4. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2007/16150 E., 2007/16151 E., 2007/22155 E., 2007/22157 E.

5. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2009/1917 E.

6. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2007/31229 E. See also Yargıtay 9. HD. 2009/30454 E., 2004/22472 E.

7. Yargıtay 9. HD. 2009/30454 E., 2007/39374 E., 2008/31144 E., 2008/9760 E.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions