If you are considering purchasing a property jointly with
someone other than a spouse, it is advisable to enter into a
co-ownership agreement. A co-ownership agreement should deal with
issues such as the sale of the property, resolution of disputes and
The danger of not entering into a co-ownership agreement was
highlighted in Claassen v Quenstedt and Others (1199/2011)
 ZAECPEHC (25 March 2014). Claassen and Quenstedt were
intending to marry. They purchased a house together, which was
registered in both their names. They did not conclude a
co-ownership agreement. Quenstedt paid the deposit, bond
repayments, rates and maintenance costs. The relationship broke
down and Claassen vacated the property.
Although both parties wanted to sell the property, they could
not agree on a number of issues, namely:
1. Should Quenstedt, who remained in occupation of the property,
pay rent to Claassen pending the sale of the property?
The Court held that an owner cannot be required to pay rent and
bond installments in respect of the property that he owns and
occupies. Quenstedt's occupation of the property was lawful,
and Claassen could not demand rent. It would have be a different
matter if Quenstedt was receiving rental income, in which case he
would be obliged to share the profit with his co-owner.
2. How were the net proceeds of the sale to be divided?
The Court ordered the parties to sell the property, settle the
bond, pay agents commission and other costs and split the net
3. Could Quenstedt demand payment from Claassen for a share of
the costs incurred by Quenstedt in respect of bond repayments,
rates and maintenance? If so, for what portion?
The Court held that:
i. Co-ownership must be distinguished from partnership. If a
partnership existed, then one partner may still have a claim
against the other even after the lapse of the usual 3 year
ii. A co-owner alleging partnership will be required to prove
the existence of the partnership. Co-ownership need not exist for
the sake of gain or profit. However, gain or profit is fundamental
to a partnership and is a factor to be taken into consideration in
determining if a partnership was established.
iii. The parties had not created a partnership; they were merely
joint owners. Thus the usual three year prescription period applied
and any claim for payment of a share of bond repayments, rates and
maintenance costs lapsed three years after it arose.
The time and money wasted in protracted litigation could have
been avoided if the parties had entered into a co-ownership
agreement at the outset dealing with all these issues.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
As a developing country, Nigeria's real estate sector is evolving at a tremendous pace. Governments at all levels are more aware of the role of real estate development on the growth of their respective territories.
Pursuant to Royal Decree No. M/4 dated 24 November 2015 and to Council of Ministers Decision No. 377 dated 13 June 2016, the Saudi Arabian legislator issued the White Land Tax Law (the "Law") and its implementing regulations (the "Regulations").
This article briefly examines the typical conveyancing process in Bahrain.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).