South Africa: SA Court Fails To Give Nestle A Break

Last Updated: 24 March 2014
Article by Ilse Du Plessis

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

The South African court case involving Nestle, owners of the Kit Kat brand, and Iffco, makers of a chocolate product called Break, has attracted considerable interest. The judgment, which was handed down on 28 November 2013 in the Gauteng Division of the High Court, contains a lot of law.

The facts were as follows. Iffco sold finger-shaped chocolate wafer barsto major South African retailers like Shoprite- Checkers. The product's packaging featured the name 'Break' in very large script, below the name 'Tiffany' which appeared in much smaller script. The packaging also featured depictions of the products. The company had trade mark registrations for Tiffany Break and Quanta Break.

Nestle claimed that Iffco was infringing it rights. These rights included trade mark registrations for trapezoidal-shaped, chocolate-coated bars (the 'Shape Registrations'), and registrations for the following slogans: Have a break...Have a Kit Kat; Have a break, Have a Kit Kat; Have a break; and Take a break ('the Slogan Registrations'). Nestle also claimed that it was entitled to protection under the well-known marks provision, and that there was passing off. Iffco, as part of its defence, claimed that the Shape Registrations were invalid.

So what did the court make of it all? It first dealt with the claim that the Shape Registrations were invalid - Iffco had argued that a shape that's necessary to obtain a technical result, or a shape that results from the nature of the goods, cannot be registered in terms of the law, that the trapezoidal shape was a necessary part of the moulding process, and that the technical result obtained was the easy release of the chocolate bars from the mould. Nestle, on the other hand, claimed that the shape had been chosen for aesthetic reasons, and that the shape was non-obvious, and in fact technically difficult and inconvenient when it was first introduced.

Judge Louw referred to the main South African authority on shape marks, the case of Beecham Group plc v Triomed (Pty) Ltd 2003 (3) SA 69 (SCA), where the court - after referring to the famous Philips shaver case in Europe - said that the intention of the technical shape prohibition was to 'preclude the registration of shapes whose essential characteristics perform a technical function, with the result that the exclusivity inherent in the trade mark right would limit the possibility of competitors supplying a product incorporating such a function or at least limit their freedom of choice in regard to the technical solution they wish to adopt in order to incorporate such a function in their product.'

The judge accepted Nestle's version. In any event, he said, the prohibition is limited to cases where the mark consists 'exclusively' of the shape which is necessary to obtain a technical result. This was not the case here. The Shape Registrations had non-functional, decorative or imaginative features, including the fingers themselves and the apron around the bottom of the edges: 'These features are not minor arbitrary elements in the three-dimensional marks... they are, in my view, important non-functional elements of the registered marks.' The Shape Registrations were, therefore, not 'solely shapes of goods which only incorporate a technical solution', and the attack on them failed.

So Nestle's registrations were valid but had they been infringed? On the issue of conventional (confusion as to origin) infringement, the judge held that the Shape Registrations had not been infringed because customers would see the depictions of the products on the Break packaging as nothing more than an indication of what was inside - the depictions would not create an impression of a material link between Nestle and Iffco's products. And if customers wouldn't be deceived by the packaging, they wouldn't be deceived by the shape of the products when they opened the packaging. As for the Slogan Registrations, there was no infringement either. The judge gave a number of reasons for this: the word 'break' was not the dominant feature of Have a break... Have a Kit Kat; there was no evidence of any actual confusion over the period of nine years that Break had been on the market; there were sufficient visual, aural and conceptual differences between the two sides' marks; and, importantly, 'break' was an ordinary word and Nestle had disclaimed exclusive rights to the word in three of its four registrations.

So what about dilution? This form of protection is limited to marks that are well known, and it requires proof that the alleged infringer has obtained an unfair advantage or that there has been detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the trade mark. The judge was happy to accept that Kit Kat - on the market for over 50 years and the 3rd largest chocolate brand in the world - is well known. But, as he pointed out, the Supreme Court of Appeal had in the famous case involving BMW & Verimark said this of dilution: 'Not only must the advantage be unfair, but it must be of a sufficiently significant degree to warrant restraining'. On top of that, 'the unfair advantage or detriment must be properly substantiated or established ... the court must be satisfied by evidence of actual detriment, or unfair advantage.'

Judge Louw did not believe there was unfair advantage or detriment here. Nestle had argued that sales of the Break product were increasingly steadily, which meant that there would be blurring as consumers associated finger- shape trade marks with two different parties. The judge disagreed: the growth in sales of Break could have been down to all sorts of reasons. So no dilution of the Shape Registrations. As for the Slogan Registrations, the judge didn't buy the argument that Nestle could no longer advertise around the 'Have a break' concept and theme, and that the trade marks' selling power had been harmed.

As for the special protection that's given to 'well-known marks' (under the Paris Convention), the judge held that this isn't available to a company which has a registration in SA, because 'such a proprietor has all the protection it requires.' And as for passing off,the judge wasn't convinced by Nestlé's argument that there was a type of double passing off here, involving both the finger wafers and the word 'Break', and that the cumulative effect made confusion very likely. The judge said this: 'The get-ups of the applicants and the respondents are so different that no customer will, in my view, think that the respondent's products emanate from Nestle or that there is an association.'

The judge dealt with a further matter, a procedural one that will be of interest to lawyers. The Shape Registrations had been filed without any clear indication that they were intended to be product shape trade marks – Nestle has simply filed drawings. During the application process of one of the marks Nestle amended the application by adding the statement: 'The mark consists of the distinctive shape or appearance of the goods.' Iffco claimed that such an amendment was impermissible, as it fundamentally affected the nature of the mark, transforming it from a logo to a shape mark. The judge disagreed for two reasons. First, he felt that most people would have understood the drawings as referring to shapes rather than logos. More importantly, however, he held that the prohibition against making material changes to the mark only applies in the case of registered trade marks, and does not extend to pending applications. This finding may have a significant impact on trade mark practice if it is not overruled by a higher court.

As I said at the outset, a lot of law in one judgement!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
KISCH IP
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
KISCH IP
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions