South Africa: The Bitter Taste Left By Non-Compliance With Procurement Legal Prescripts

Last Updated: 8 October 2013
Article by Adams & Adams

Section 217 (1) of the Constitution1requires that, when organs of state contract for goods and services, they should do so in accordance with a system which is "fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective".   A framework within which  this constitutional requirement must be implemented has been created through various legislative measures including the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 ("PFMA"), Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003,  the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 ("PPPFA"), The Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000,  as well as numerous regulations promulgated under these Acts, particularly the regulations promulgated under the PFMA ("Treasury Regulations").   The PFMA Regulations provide for Supply Chain Management systems2 that must be implemented by organs of state, which systems should also comply with the principles contained in section 217(1) of the Constitution. Despite the existence of such regulatory measures, all too often suppliers are confronted with non-compliance by various organs of state with one or more provisions of the above legal prescripts.   This is despite the fact that these legal prescripts have been viewed by our courts as peremptory, such that failure to comply therewith may result in a declaration of invalidity of the administrative act of the organ of state.3 

A classic case of non-compliance was seen in the TEB Properties v The MEC for Department of Health and Social Development, North West4  where a dispute arose after the Department sought to summarily terminate a lease agreement.  The lease related to office accommodation at a monthly rental of R3 241 800 and the main basis for the termination by the Department was that it failed to comply with statutory prescripts.  The agreement was concluded in November 2008 with occupation scheduled to commence almost a year later (i.e. on 1 December 2009), in order to allow the appellant time to construct the accommodation.  When the Department sought to summarily terminate the lease agreement, the Department argued that a contract of this magnitude should have been concluded through a competitive process to allow maximisation of "good value for the government and ensuring economic and effective service from the market"Michael1  in order to comply with the principles set out in section 217(1) of the Constitution as well as section 38(1)(a)(iii) of the PFMA.  However, the argument continued, the accounting officer in office at the time failed to conclude the lease agreement through a competitive bidding process under the incorrect premise that the procurement of office accommodation in this instance was urgent and that the accounting officer was entitled to enter into the agreement without limitations based on the officers interpretation of Regulation 13.2.4.

The court in TEB Properties considered that the PFMA provides, inter alia, that the National Treasury may make regulations or issue instructions in the form of practice notes that will be applicable to all institutions to which the PFMA applies.  The National Treasury has issued practice notes relating to procurement so as to ensure uniform minimum norms. The most relevant of these practice notes is Practice Note Number 8 of 2007/2008 which makes provision for four types of procurement and states that competitive bidding should be employed for contracts over R500 000.  In terms of Treasury Regulation 13.2.4 an accounting officer may enter into lease transactions without any limitations, provided that such transactions are limited to operating lease transactions.  Treasury Regulation 16A6.4, however, allows an accounting officer or accounting authority to deviate from the competitive bidding process, should it be impractical to invite competitive bids to procure the required goods or services.  These regulations prescribe that there be rational reasons for deviating from the competitive bidding process and that the discretionary powers be exercised in accordance with the law and empowering legislation. 

This meant that, while the practice notes prescribe that such a lease agreement should have been concluded after a competitive bidding process had been completed the accounting officer had discretion to depart from this in terms of Regulation 13.2.4 read together with Regulation 16A6.4, provided that there were rational reasons for doing so.  None existed in the TEB Properties case and thus the court correctly found that the lease agreement was invalid for failing to comply with the peremptory requirements.  The appellant argued, based on the Turquand rule, that the failure of the Department to follow the competitive bidding process as it was required to, was an internal formality and that it was unaware that this formality had not been complied with and thus the agreement should be allowed to stand.  The court referred to the Eastern Cape Provincial Government v Contractprops decision where it was stated that where one of the parties has no power in law to conclude a contract and has been deprived of that power (if it ever had it) in the public interest the agreement cannot be held to be valid.  That the other party was misled into believing that the Department had the power is regrettable but that this cannot alter the fact that such agreement is ultra vires the powers of the Eastern Cape Provincial government Department.

The TEB Properties decision leaves a bitter taste for any supplier as in this case the Department entered into the agreement with the full knowledge that it had failed to comply with the peremptory regulations and then sought to cancel the agreement on that very basis.  The Department in this case alleged that the appellant had entered into the lease agreement with (the previous accounting officer) aware that the Department, despite approving the lease, had expressed the view that such transactions are normally done through an open tender process.

Regulation 16A6.4 is a legally valid exception to the rule that contracts over R500 000 should be concluded through a competitive bidding process.  In CEO SA Social Security Agency (SASSA) v Cashpaymaster, non-compliance with a competitive bidding process was allowed to stand on this basis.  This case involved the awarding of a contract for the provision of banking and payment services for the South African public that receive social grants.  SASSA chose not to use the public procurement process in granting the award to the South African Post Office (SAPO).  In this case, SASSA found that using SAPO to provide the required banking services meant that it was getting greater value for money as SAPO was cheaper than the contractors previously used and the Postbank (which operated under SAPO) was more easily accessible to the citizens that received these social grants. 

SASSA stated that its intention was to meet its constitutional object of providing social assistance to the needy and this it did by delegating this duty to SAPO.  Paymaster disputed the manner in which the agreement between SASSA and SAPO was concluded on the basis that SASSA failed to comply with its own procurement policies as well as the peremptory requirements.  The court held that Paymaster had to show that the reasons that SASSA relied on for not making use of the public procurement process were irrational.  While Paymaster was able to show that the reasons were "wrong" in that they did not comply with the requirements for a competitive-process, they could not show that these were irrational and therefore did not fall within the ambit of Regulation 16A6.4.  The court stated that it also needs to consider public interest, pragmatism and practicality before choosing to invalidate an administrative act.5  In this case, the court found that the deviation from the public procurement process was justified in terms of the Regulations and therefore should be allowed to stand, much to the chagrin of Paymaster.

It is clear that a court should not concern itself with whether or not the parties were aware that an organ of state failed to comply with legal prescripts when declaring an act that does not comply with such legal prescripts invalid.  What is also clear is that suppliers in general need to be weary when contracting with organs of state.  This is the case whether the contract arises through a public bidding process or not as there are many cases where a public bidding process was implemented but the organ of state failed to comply with the principles contained in the Constitution and in legislation.  It is concerning that there are very limited cases where a remedy is available to a supplier but when weighed up against the interests of the public and legal certainty, justice is better served by protecting the latter.


1 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

2 Can be found in regulation 16A of the PFMA Regulations.

3 See Chief Executive Officer, SA Social Security Agency NO & Others v Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd 2011 (3) ALL SA 23(SCA); Eastern Cape Provincial Government & Others v Contractprops 25 (Pty) Ltd 2001 (4) SA 142 (SCA).

4 [2011] ZASCA 243

5 CEO SASSA v Cash Paymaster para 16-29.

Michael1 Please link this with what the "statutory prescripts" required, so you can show what you say was non-compliance with the legal prescript

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.