South Africa: Muhlberg's Brief

Last Updated: 10 May 2013
Article by Hans Muhlaberg

The ugly face of IP shows itself from time to time. It did when SAB Miller tried (unsuccessfully) to stop a young man from producing a t-shirt that parodied/commented on its Black Label brand – despite the Constitutional Court's judgment, there are people in IP who still cannot accept that something as touchy feely as the right of free expression can ever override something as solid as a trade mark right. Who still believe that spoof t-shirts actually harm corporate reputations. Who really believe that people seeing a Walocaust t-shirt suppose that Walmart supported the Nazis, rather than seeing it as a bit of culture jamming, a playful allusion to the fact that shopping sucks.
This ugly face has shown itself again, this time in a posting on Stellenbosch University's IP law blog, The piece, entitled Trade Marks Going Up In Smoke, suggests that if the SA government invokes Australian-style legislation that bans the use of any name or logo on cigarette packs, it will be guilty of expropriating property, and liable to pay huge sums in compensation to brand owners (Rothmans, Dunhill and Peter Stuyvesant get special mention). It's premised on the argument that a step like this will prevent brand owners from using their trade marks, making the registrations vulnerable to cancellation for non-use. Don't do it is the message, it'll end up in the Constitutional Court: 'Does it (government) feel sufficiently strongly about this issue to pay millions of Rands in compensation to the proprietor of each registered trade mark which is prevented from being used in this manner and thus condemned to a certain demise?'
Where to start?

It's worth noting that Stellenbosch's Chair of IP Law is Rupert-funded. And the expropriation argument isn't the most compelling argument ever advanced. Is a restriction of use really an expropriation? Not according to constitutional lawyers, Currie and De Waal, who in The Bill of Rights Handbook argue that there's a difference between deprivation of property, which does not require compensation, and expropriation, which they say requires an acquisition of ownership. Even if it is an expropriation, the purpose of the expropriation (public health) will be considered when deciding compensation, so perhaps not quite the 'treasure trove' claimed in the posting. And does the proposed legislation really contemplate zero use of the brand name (my understanding has always been that some minimal use of the name will be allowed, without logos or other branding)? So will this really amount to complete non-use? In any event, it's a defence to a cancellation action to show that you've been prevented from using your mark by special circumstances.

Then there's the posting's tone: 'While it is often claimed that smoking can retard the physical growth of children, there can be no doubt that inhibiting the use of cigarette trade marks limits their growth as items of intellectual property and as commercial assets.' To suggest that trade mark health is as important as public health is to invite public ire. Especially as the public saw straight through BAT's recent transparent attempt to circumvent the smoking advertising ban by sponsoring an anti-illegal cigarette campaign which used brand elements (colours) of BAT's products - the very idea that all colours and logos should be removed from cigarette packs does, of course, flow from the 'neuromarketing' research done by people like Martin Lindstrom, which suggests that simple brand elements like colour stimulate the urge to smoke.
The posting ends: 'Perhaps the government should put this issue in its pipe and smoke it!' Arrogance may be appropriate in some cases, but probably not when you're as unpopular as the tobacco industry is. Far better to make nice, to tell people that the use of your product can prevent Parkinson's - see posting of 16 May 2012 on . Which is good to know, as long as you're OK with heart disease or lung cancer!


Telling it as it isn't: On 10 May 2012 the ASA dealt with claims made about a Patrick Holford product called Smart Kids Brain Boost. The ASA ruled that the claim that taking the product 'could assist your child to perform at the top of their own capacity /ability' (a toned down version of the original, which was that it would put the sprog 'top of the class') was unacceptable, as there was no proof that it boosted scholastic performance. It also ruled that the evidence of a Professor Veldman - who said it was OK to describe Phospholipids (something provided by the product ) as 'the intelligent fats' - was not good enough because he provided no proof, so this claim had to be withdrawn. The name of the product had to be changed too because it created an 'unsubstantiated expectation'.


Botox: The EU's highest court recently held that cosmetic trade mark registrations for Botocyl and Botolist - belonging to L'Oreal and Helena Rubinstein respectively - were invalid because they took advantage of the distinctive character and repute of Allergan's pharmaceutical trade mark registration for Botox. It found that the trade mark Botox enjoys a huge reputation and awareness, and it rejected the argument that the term common to the marks, bot, is a descriptive term. L'Oreal and Helena Rubinstein did themselves no favours by admitting that, although their products did not include the active ingredient of Botox (botulinum toxin), they had chosen their names to take advantage of the image associated with Botox - wrinkly opposition party leaders who refuse to acknowledge reality... sorry that should read youthfulness. Reported in 13 May 2012.


Oracle v Google: A US jury found that Google infringed Oracle's copyright when it used Java's APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) in Android. It rejected Google's defence that APIs, 'like grammar, are uncopyrightable aspects of a language'. US law, like US football, is of course totally incomprehensible to anyone who didn't grow up there. It's now apparently necessary for a judge to decide whether APIs can actually be copyrighted - whether the 'structure, sequence and organisation' are sufficiently complex to merit protection - and whether Google can raise a defence of 'fair use'. Reported in on 7 May 2012.

Discovery Gored: On 17 May 2012 Business Day reported that the Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) succeeded in a copyright case against Discovery Health. Judge Jody Kollapen held that BHF has copyright in a 13-digit code numbering system that covers every medical practice in SA and that's used in the processing of medical claims, because the creation of the database involved skill and effort. He also held that Discovery infringed the copyright when it created its own database because it used a substantial part of BHF's database. He went on to order Discovery to pay damages of some R1.2 million per year. In a similar recent case involving Transunion and Autobid, a KZN court held that a vehicle numbering system enjoys copyright.


Valuable Assets: BBC News recently reported that AOL had sold 800 patents to Microsoft for US$ 1.06 billion, who in turn sold some of the patents on to Facebook for US$550 million. AOL kindly distributed the proceeds of the sale to its shareholders. Another illustration of how patents, and more particularly patent portfolios, have become extremely valuable assets for tech companies.
Too Many Laws: In an article that appears in the May 2012 issue of De Rebus – Why Two Is Not Better Than One - Spoor & Fisher consultant, Alison Dyer, bemoans the fact that in order to know patent law these days you now need to consult obscure acts like the Nuclear Energy Act and the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act. She also points out that the Commissioner created by the Companies Act of 2008 to oversee companies and IP (including patents) is not the same Commissioner created by the Patents Act to oversee various aspects of patent law.


'Patent law is perceived by many as a fascinating branch of the legal profession' - the opening line of an article dated 11 May 2012 on the Adams & Adams website,, entitled Don't forget the goose. Not sure about the goose, but the line's likely to be remembered!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions