The scale of opportunity in the rail sector in Africa is vast.
As the world's prosperity grows and new markets develop, the
demand for minerals and other resources increases. Until now, much
of Africa's mineral wealth has stayed stubbornly in Africa and
this is perhaps due, in no small part, to lack of joined-up rail
Heavy haul rail is, of course, not the only means of
transporting minerals. However, once implemented it is probably the
most efficient means of moving bulk materials and if Africa's
mineral resources are to be unlocked then heavy haul rail will have
its part to play. Indeed, some commentators believe that a
comprehensive heavy haul network could make the difference between
a valuable deposit and "expensive dirt". To unlock
resources of the scale available in Africa, it is likely that over
2-3000km of new rail with be needed which, for the track alone,
carries a price tag of over $25bn.
The existing network
Africa's railways are often unconnected and are of mixed
gauge. There is a concentration of cape gauge railway (1067mm) in
southern Africa but elsewhere there are isolated lines of standard
gauge (1435mm), cape gauge, meter gauge (1000mm) and narrow gauge
(600-800mm) (see Figure 1).
Heavy haul rail is essentially defined as rail with an axle
loading of 25 tonnes or more which is hauling at least 20 million
gross tonnes per annum or in excess of 5000 gross tonnes per train.
It requires rail of at least standard gauge and very little of
Africa's railway meets this requirement. In fact, only 10% of
Africa's 80,000km of rail is heavy gauge. Figure 2 shows the
breakdown of rail type by African region from which it is clear
that as things stand, heavy haul makes a very modest contribution
to the overall rail freight market.
Figure 3 identifies the minerals to be found in each country.
Some of these are more sensibly carried by other means (in some
cases, plane) but the train is often the better means of transport.
Where a mineral rich country is on the coast then it ought to be
possible to get the minerals to market without the need for any
intergovernmental cooperation. Landlocked countries will not have
this luxury and reaching a profit sharing agreement could be
difficult when both parties effectively have a veto.
Even where a country is not landlocked, intergovernmental
cooperation could be beneficial to develop a railway network
(rather than a series of unconnected railways) and to ensure that
new railways are developed to common standards and to a common
programme so that an interoperable network can be created in due
Passenger rail systems generally have two main sources of
revenue – the passenger (through paying fares) and the host
government. It is rare for passenger revenue to be sufficient to
fund the development, maintenance and operation of the system so
government support is often required in order for it to be viable.
Whether a heavy haul railway will be financially viable will depend
on the economics of the scheme, such as the distance to be covered,
the terrain and the type and quantity of the minerals to be
transported. Other non-railways costs will also be relevant
including the other costs of getting the minerals to market (such
as the mining costs and the costs of developing and operating a
port). What can set freight railways apart from passenger railways
is that the economics can work in favour of the freight system as a
whole so that it is economic to develop and operate the necessary
infrastructure in order for the minerals to find a market.
The economics of a scheme can be improved considerably if it can
be utilised by more than one mining company. This is possible where
mines are close together or they are located close to a line
between the furthest to port and the port. When this happens, the
costs of developing and operating a system can be shared but this
will bring with it its own difficulties. For example, the operators
will have to share a facility and will have to consider what will
happen if one of them ceases to use it. A system of regulation may
therefore be required which will add an unwelcome layer of
complexity, particularly if the system travels through more than
A further option is for the line to be mixed use in terms of
freight and passenger transport although this may not be feasible,
particularly as passengers favour fast trains which stop and
freight users favour slow trains which do not.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Attractive new shipping provisions in South Africa’s new Taxation Laws Amendment bill go some way in showing that the government is serious about taking steps to revive South Africa’s rather sleepy international shipping sector.
This paper considers the recent developments in Nigerian Ship
Arrest Law – the Admiralty Jurisdiction Procedure Rules
(AJPR) 2011 for the Federal High Court of Nigeria (FHC), and its
effect on ship arrest practice.
Confidentiality is considered one of the major benefits of arbitration and is, in some cases, the sole reason why parties opt for arbitration instead of normal court proceedings.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).