South Africa: Strike Notices - One For All Or All For One? The Constitutional Court Settles A Vexed Question

Last Updated: 8 October 2012
Article by Stuart Harrison

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

Imagine you employ 10 000 workers across the country.  Two of your non-unionised employees posted in a small town are dissatisfied with their work conditions and refer a dispute to the CCMA.  Following a failed attempt at conciliating the dispute, you receive from the two employees a strike notice in terms of section 64(1)(b) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (the "LRA"), which requires that at least 48 hours written notice of the commencement of a strike must be given to an employer. 

You are not particularly concerned by the threat of this strike, given that it only involves two employees.  However, on the day of the strike, most of your 10 000 strong workforce across the country down tools in support of the two employees.  Would you have responded differently to the strike notice had you known the extent of your employees' participation?  Perhaps you would have acceded to the demands of the two employees or put into place contingency measures to prevent further disruption in the workplace?

This scenario was one with which the Constitutional Court grappled when it considered the question whether the requirements of section 64(1)(b) of LRA requires every participating employee to a strike to issue a strike notice (either personally or through a representative) in the case of SATAWU & others v Moloto N.O. & another, CCT 128/11 [2012] ZACC 19.  The case was a long running and controversial one involving a nine year dispute about the fairness of the dismissals of 64 workers.  The dismissed workers had been employed by Equity Aviation (now in liquidation).  At the time, SATAWU was recognised as the bargaining agent of all workers in the employ of Equity Aviation, in terms of recognition agreement.  Following a failed wage negotiation before the CCMA, SATAWAU issued a strike notice to Equity Aviation, simply stating "we intend to embark on strike on 18 December 2003 at 08h00". The strike called by SATAWU was protected and complied with the provisions of section 64 of the LRA.

Although the strike was called by SATAWU, a number of members of minority unions and non-unionised employees also engaged in the strike action. In response to the participation of non-SATAWU members in the strike, Equity Aviation issued notices to those workers alleging that their participation in the strike was unlawful (because the strike notice did not cover them) and requesting that they return to work.  The non-SATAWU members who failed to heed this request were subsequently dismissed by Equity Aviation for unauthorised absenteeism.

An automatically unfair dismissal dispute was subsequently referred to the Labour Court for determination, in which the union and the workers claimed they had been dismissed for participation in a protected strike.  Before the Labour Court, Equity Aviation argued inter alia that only SATAWU members could embark on the strike, as the remaining workers were not bona fide members of SATAWU. This therefore rendered their participation in the strike action unlawful and was therefore unprotected, so the employer contended.

Equity Aviation lost in the Labour Court and in the Labour Appeal Court (albeit in a split decision by the LAC judges) but was vindicated on appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (the "SCA"), which held that a purposive interpretation of the provisions of section 64(1)(b) of the LRA required every employee who intends to embark on a strike to notify his or her employer of that intention, personally or through a representative, in order for that strike action to be protected (the SCA felt that this would give effect to orderly collective bargaining, one of the objects of the LRA). 

SATAWU in turn appealed to the Constitutional Court on the basis that the purposive interpretation of section 64(1)(b) of the LRA which had found favour with the SCA conflicted with the express language used by the legislature in section 64(1)(b) and unjustifiably limited the employees' constitutional right to strike, as conferred by section 23 of the Constitution.

The Constitutional Court itself was split on the issue.  The minority of the Constitutional Court (4 out of the 9 judges who heard the matter) was of the view that the SCA was right and that SATAWU's appeal ought to fail because orderly collective bargaining required that the employer be able to determine from a strike notice which employees intended to strike.

The majority of the Constitutional Court disagreed.  What weighed heavily in the mind of the majority was that SATAWU was the recognised bargaining agent of all workers employed by Equity Aviation, including employees who were not members of SATAWU.  This meant that, in the wage dispute that had been referred by SATAWU to the CCMA, SATAWU had in effect represented not only its own members but also the dismissed strikers who were not its members. 

The Court was also influenced by the fact that SATAWU had the majority of the support in the workplace and the recognition agreement concluded between it and Equity Aviation bound the non-member employees, which meant that the dismissed strikers and other employees had in effect been part of the collective bargaining process right from the outset. 

The majority of the Constitutional Court considered the language of section 64(1)(b) and found that it contained only one express requirement, that is, that at least 48 hours notice of the commencement of a strike must be given.  It went on to find that the language of section 64(1) as a whole suggests that there can only be one strike in relation to one dispute and accordingly there is little logic to suggest that more than one notice in relation to a single strike is necessary.  The Court made the point that the right to strike is protected in the Constitution as a fundamental right without express limitation, and was an attempt to redress the inequality in the socio-economic power in employer/employee relations which should not easily be restricted.  It therefore concluded that the non-SATAWU members who joined the strike did not have to give their own, separate strike notice in order for their participation in the strike to be protected.

The binding decision of the Constitutional Court (albeit by the slimmest of majorities) is therefore that one strike notice is good for all employees.  Provided that the strike notice sets out the issue over which the employees will go on strike with reasonable clarity, a single strike notice is sufficient to enable all employees of the employer to participate in the strike (regardless of whether the employees are all members of the union where it is a union who issues the strike notice). 

Planning for strikes therefore just got a little bit more complicated for employers, who can no longer assume that strike notices issued by one part of its workforce will mean that the other part won't be striking too.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions