South Africa: BMW And Grandmark Part Company

Last Updated: 31 August 2012
Article by Gaelyn Scott

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

Design law is an oft-overlooked area of intellectual property law. Yet it's very important, because it allows companies to get design registrations for various product features (most commonly shape) if those features are new. In the past, design registrations were only available for aesthetic features, which are described in the Designs Act as features that are  'judged solely by the eye'. Aesthetic design registrations are still around,  of course, and they provide protection for up to 15 years.  A relatively new development, however, has been the creation of the functional design registration, which protects features (again including shape) that are new and that are necessitated by function. When the Designs Act was amended to make provision for the registration of functional designs, it was also amended to exclude spare parts from its ambit.  Section  14(6) of the act reads: 'In the case of an article which is in the nature of a spare part for a machine, vehicle or equipment, no feature ...of such article shall afford the registered proprietor of a functional design applied to any one of the articles in question, any rights in terms of this Act in respect of such features'.

Replacement parts are vehicle parts that aren't manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers but by independent companies, many of whom are based in China. By all accounts replacement parts are fit for purpose, and the only real difference  is that they're much cheaper than the originals, costing anywhere between 1/3 to  ˝  of  the price.  For obvious reasons, the replacement parts companies pose a serious risk to the businesses of the original  vehicle manufacturers. So there has been considerable legal skirmishing in this area, with claims of both design and trade mark  infringement.

Grandmark is a South African  company that imports and sells replacement parts, and it has a sizeable business.  Grandmark and BMW  have a history. Back in 1999, BMW obtained a consent (uncontested) court order against Grandmark, which prevented Grandmark from infringing certain design and trade mark registrations belonging to BMW. Seemingly unconvinced that Grandmark was complying with the order, BMW obtained a search and seizure order that enabled it to inspect Grandmark's premises. Based on what it found there it went back to court and asked for an order declaring Grandmark to be in contempt of court, and ordering it to stop infringing various registrations belonging to BMW: four specific aesthetic design registrations, some 150 further less clearly defined design registrations, and  certain trade mark registrations. Grandmark's main defence – the four design registrations are invalid and should be cancelled, alternatively, if the court finds that there is design or trade mark infringement, the matter should be referred to the Competition Tribunal so that it can decide if BMW's practice of registering designs for all its vehicle  parts, as well as aggressively pursuing replacement parts suppliers, is anti-competitive. BMW's riposte – the court doesn't need to consider the validity of the four design registrations because Grandmark is in contempt of court.

The case was heard by Judge Ranchod of the North Gauteng High Court and he handed down judgement on 25 July 2012.  He found that there was no contempt of court because BMW was unable to prove that Grandmark had deliberately flouted a court order. He found that the validity of the four design registrations was absolutely critical to the matter and therefore had to be decided. He went on to find that the four registrations – which were for a headlight assembly, a bonnet, a grille and a front fender - were invalid for two reasons. First, they had been wrongly registered as aesthetic designs, because the shapes of things like fenders don't, to use  terminology from older court cases,  'influence choice or selection', have 'individual characteristics ... calculated to attract the attention of the beholder', or have something that is 'special, peculiar, distinctive, significant or striking about them'. These things are clearly functional said the judge:  'A replacement part for a E46 BMW serves only one function and that is to replace a part on a E46 BMW. It has to look the same, it has to fit the same, and it cannot look any other way, as BMW itself concedes,  to serve its purpose.'  The judge concluded that BMW had registered the designs as aesthetic designs in 'an attempt to circumvent the exclusionary  provisions relating to spare parts.' Second, the registrations were invalid because they weren't new, in that they weren't  different from the 'state of the art' at the time of registration. The  judge said that mere trade variants are not new or registrable, and he made the point that in the case of each design registration Grandmark was able to show that there had been at least one earlier BMW registration that was substantially the same.  The judge pointed out that BMW's kidney-shaped grille, for example, has been around so long that it is a 'trade mark' of BMW's. 

On the issue of the 150 other design registrations, the judge was astounded that BMW had not even attached copies of the certificates of registration to the court papers, and he refused an application that was brought just before the hearing for consent to do so. So there was no proof that the registrations even existed, prompting the judge to say that 'in the absence of such proof there can be no reasonable apprehension that these "rights" (if they exist) may be infringed in future.' He went on to say that  the interdict that was sought in respect of the 150 designs 'is unheard of and in my view, would be nothing short of an abuse of BMW's market power and the court processes.'

Lastly, as regards the BMW trade marks, the judge noted that it is now well-established that so-called 'non-trade mark' use (sometimes also described as 'descriptive' or 'incidental' use) – in  other words use that doesn't suggest a connection as to origin - of a registered trade mark is lawful.  This was made clear in 2007 in a case involving BMW,  where the Supreme Court of Appeal said that BMW could not stop Verimark using a BMW vehicle (which showed the BMW logo) in a TV ad for a car polish because the use in no way suggested any connection with BMW. In the same way Grandmark's usage of the BMW trade marks suggested no connection with the company – its materials featured statements like this:  'Replacement part suitable for BMW E46', and 'These products are not manufactured by or under licence from the original vehicle manufacturer.'

The case may well go on appeal because the implications for the vehicle and replacements parts industries are huge.  Watch this space!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Moore Attorneys
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Moore Attorneys
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions