South Africa: Can Misconduct Be Used To Dismiss Employees In Terms Of Section 189?

Last Updated: 22 July 2012
Article by Sushila Dherver

FAWU obo Kapesi & others / Premier Foods t/a Blue Ribbon Salt River


Can an employer use its operational requirements to dismiss employees for misconduct?

This was the question that Basson J had to answer in the matter of FAWU obo Kapesi & others / Premier Foods t/a Blue Ribbon Salt River1. In this matter the respondent had dismissed the individual applicants based on its operational requirements after a two month long protected strike characterised by acts of misconduct. These acts included the intimidation of non-striking employees, petrol-bombing of their homes and even an attempted assassination.

After the strike the respondent suspended the individual applicants pending a disciplinary hearing into the acts of misconduct that took place during the strike. Many of the witnesses that had come forward with information regarding the misconduct were too scared to testify at the disciplinary hearings and the respondent's key witness had disappeared. The respondent then changed its strategy and issued a notice to the union, representing the individual applicants, of the possible dismissal of the applicants based on its operational requirements. Following facilitations with the CCMA the respondent dismissed the individual applicants due to its operational requirements.

The applicant referred a dispute to the Labour Court pleading that the individual applicants' dismissal was unfair as the reason for the dismissal was misconduct, not the respondent's operational requirements and that the respondent was not entitled to resort to section 189 of the LRA to dismiss the individual applicants for misconduct.

The respondent pleaded that "section 189 was a legitimate vehicle for terminating the employment of employees under circumstances where incidents of serious criminal conduct, which had a profound impact on the business of an employer, occurrence and where it was impossible to take disciplinary action against such employees".

The Labour Court held that the dismissal of the individual applicants was substantially and procedurally unfair, but ordered the respondent to pay each of the individual applicants compensation equal to 12 months' remuneration.

Previous cases where dismissals for operational requirements have been used in cases involving misconduct

In terms of section 213 of the LRA:

'"operational requirements" means requirements based on the economic, technological, structural or similar needs of an employer'.

The Code of Good Practice: Dismissal based on Operational Requirements states that:

"...economic reasons are those that relate to the financial management of the enterprise. Technological reasons refer to the introduction of new technology... Structural reasons relate to the redundancy of posts consequent to restructuring of the employer's enterprise."

How then could an employer dismiss employees based on any of the above reasons where there had been acts of misconduct? In answering this question the Labour Court looked at previous cases where the courts had found that employers had a legitimate reason to dismiss employee based on operational requirements where there had been acts of misconduct.

In SA Commercial Catering & Allied Workers Union & others v Pep Stores (1998) ILJ 1226 (LC) the Labour Court "accepted as a valid operational requirement warranting retrenchment the fact that a retail store was suffering massive stock losses due to pilferage and that the employees appeared unable to protect the goods in their custody... The court accepted that the company had shown good cause to shut down two branches because they were not profitable and that the reason for that was the unexplained stock losses (shrinkage). The court accepted that was a sufficient reason to close the branches for operational requirements."2

And in Tiger Food Brands Limited t/a Albany Bakeries v Levy N.O. & others (2007) 28 ILJ 395 (LC) the Labour Court held that an employer was entitled to use the facilitation process in terms of section 189A of the LRA where that employer sought to dismiss employees suspected of misconduct in the form of knowledge of an assassination attempt.

The facts of this case, as Basson J stated, were very similar to those in the Premier Foods matter in that the matter related to a strike marred by violence and intimidation of non-striking employees. It was also not possible to identify those involved in the violence and therefore impossible to have disciplinary hearings. The employer needed to start its business back up and the incidents of violence were preventing this from happening. The employer then decided that it was no longer possible to manage the business due to the incidents of violence and that its operational requirements required that it terminate its employment relationship with the group of employees suspected of being involved in the violence. The Labour Court, in setting aside the commissioner's ruling that the employer could not use the s189A facilitation process, held that it was not only in circumstances where an employer was required to downsize that an employer could use section 189A and that an employer needed to be able to manage its business and could not do so when managers were being assassinated and threats were made against them.

What distinguished Premier Foods from the other two cases?

If the courts have permitted employers to dismiss their employees based on their operational requirements where misconduct was involved, what then made the Premier Foods case different?

Basson J distinguished the Premier Foods case from the Tiger Brands case by showing that, although both cases involved serious acts of violence during a strike and the inability to hold disciplinary hearings due to the perpetrators of the violence not being identified, the rationale behind the employer's decision to follow the s189A route in the Tiger Brands case was because the misconduct prevented the employer from turning its company around.

In distinguishing the Pep Stores case from the Premier Foods case, Basson J found that the "dominant purpose" of the consultation process in the Pep Stores case was to find a solution to the problem of the stock loss and the purpose was to save the business from financial failure. It was also noted by the applicants' representative, in the Pep Stores case, that the fact that cause of the financial loss was misconduct did not detract from the fact that the reason for the retrenchment was to prevent the closure of the business.

In the Premier Foods case although the misconduct did have an impact on the employer's business it was not the true reason for following the section 189A process, the true reason was the fact that the employer decided that it could not hold disciplinary hearings not because it feared for the safety of the witnesses but that it feared failing in its case against the individual applicants, the Court held. The Court was also not convinced that the respondent had shown that the incidents of violence had threatened or affected the economic viability of the company to such an extent in any case that the respondent had an economic rationale to implement a s189A procedure.

Where to from here?

While the courts have accepted that employers may dismiss employees based on their operational requirements where misconduct is involved, employers may not simply resort to dismissals for operational requirements in circumstances where those who commit serious forms of misconduct cannot be identified or the employer does not think it has a strong case against such employees.

It is clear from the Premier Foods decision that an employer may only resort to dismissing employees based on its operational requirements in cases of misconduct where the true reason for the dismissal is the employer's operational requirements and not to in order to circumvent the normal disciplinary process.


1. FAWU obo Kapesi & others / Premier Foods t/a Blue Ribbon Salt River [2010] 9 BLLR 903 (LC

2. Supra at paragraph 57

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions