South Africa: Constitutional Court Denies The Competition Commission Direct Access

Last Updated: 5 July 2012
Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

Article by Lee Mendelsohn , Derushka Chetty and Sarah Pearson (Candidate Attorney)

South Africa's Constitutional Court (the "ConCourt") has handed down its judgments in both the (i) Yara South Africa (Proprietary) Limited ("Yara") and Omnia Fertilizer Limited ("Omnia") case (the "Yara/Omnia case") and (ii) the Loungefoam (Proprietary) Limited ("Loungefoam") and Vitafoam (Proprietary) Limited ("Vitafoam") case (the "Loungefoam case"). The judgments, which were handed down yesterday, effectively deny the Competition Commission (the "Commission") leave to appeal the decisions of the Competition Appeal Court (the "CAC") in these matters directly to the ConCourt.

In an attempt to seek clarity on the scope and proper exercise of its statutory powers of complaint initiation, investigation and referral, the Commission sought to overturn the CAC's decisions in each of the Yara/Omnia case and the Loungefoam case.  In these cases, the CAC has ruled that the Commission could not amend its complaint referrals to introduce new evidence, allegations or join new respondents.

In the ordinary course, the avenues available to a would-be appellant seeking to appeal a CAC decision would be to:

  • seek leave from the CAC to appeal the matter to the Supreme Court of Appeal (the "SCA");  or
  • if the matter concerns a constitutional issue, seek leave from the CAC or the SCA (as the case may be) to appeal to the ConCourt. Leave from the ConCourt may be sought directly if the CAC or the SCA refuses leave or whether there is a necessity to seek leave directly, in the interests of justice.

The Commission chose to apply directly to the ConCourt for leave to appeal both these matters and in this way bypassed the CAC and the SCA.

The background of the Yara/Omnia case is as follows:

  • In December 2003 the Commission received a complaint from Nutri-Flo CC and Nutri-Fertiliser CC (the "Nutri-Flo complainants").  The Nutri-Flo complainants were producers and suppliers of blended fertilisers out of the raw material either manufactured or imported by Yara, Omnia, and Sasol Chemical Industries Proprietary ("Sasol").
  • Pursuant to the complaint, the Commission conducted an investigation and referred the complaint to the Competition Tribunal (the "Tribunal") for adjudication in terms of the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended (the "Competition Act") citing Yara, Omnia and Sasol as the respondents.
  • After lengthy negotiations and a settlement agreement concluded between Sasol and the Commission, the Commission made it known, ahead of the hearing of the matter at the Tribunal, that it would use information received from Sasol to prove its complaint.
  • The Commission applied to the Tribunal to amend the complaint referral alleging collusive behaviour on the part of Yara and Omnia, which Yara and Omnia opposed on the basis that the proposed amendment fell outside the scope of the Nutri-Flo complaint.
  • Omnia brought a counter-application to have the referral of the complaint set aside on the basis that the Nutri-Flo complainants had not submitted any complaint concerning collusive behaviour by itself and Yara.
  • The Tribunal decision - On 24 February 2010, the Tribunal granted the Commission's application for leave to amend the referral to include allegations regarding collusive behaviour by Yara and Omnia and dismissed Omnia's counter-application.
  • The CAC decision - The matter was then appealed to the CAC and the appeal was upheld setting aside the Tribunal's aforementioned decisions.  The complaint referral against Yara and Omnia was thus set aside.
  • The Commission then applied for leave to appeal the CAC's decision directly to the ConCourt. In addition, the Commission applied to the CAC for leave to appeal against its decision to the SCA, but indicated that it would not pursue this application if leave to appeal to the ConCourt was granted.

The background of the Loungefoam case is as follows:

  • On 25 May 2007 the Commission received a letter from Mr. Troy Carelse, the owner of a foam manufacturing company in competition with Loungefoam and Vitafoam (manufacturers and suppliers of flexible polyurethane or block foam), alleging that Loungefoam and Vitafoam engaged in anti-competitive behaviour. The Commission subsequently commenced a formal complaint investigation on 3 September 2007 against Loungefoam and Vitafoam for price fixing, market allocation, exclusionary acts, inducement, predatory pricing and buying up scarce resources.
  • On 27 November 2007 the Commission initiated its own complaint alleging the same anti-competitive conduct against four additional parties, including Feltex Holdings (Proprietary) Limited ("Feltex") in order to expand the scope of the complaint process previously initiated.  The purpose of this step was, according to the initiating statement, to add the additional parties to the referral as they were implicated in conduct prohibited by the Competition Act based on documents obtained from Loungefoam and Vitafoam during the investigation process.
  • On 26 May 2008, a further complaint initiation followed, expanding the investigation to include Steinhoff International Holdings (Proprietary) Limited ("Steinhoff") and Kap International Holdings (Proprietary) Limited ("Kap").  This was consequent to the Commission's suspicion that the alleged collusion between the original respondents might be a product of collusion between Steinhoff and Kap.
  • In September 2008, the Commission referred a complaint to the Tribunal against Loungefoam, Vitafoam, Feltex, Steinhoff and Kap alleging that (i) Loungefoam and Vitafoam had agreed to fix purchase prices and selling prices in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act; (ii) Loungefoam and Vitafoam had engaged in customer allocation by agreeing not to compete for customers in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act; and (iii) Loungefoam and Feltex had engaged in market division through the reciprocal restraint of trade covenant in their sale of business agreement in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act.
  • On 16 February 2010, the Commission applied to the Tribunal to amend its complaint referral in respect of various aspects which included new allegations that Feltex was involved in price fixing with Loungefoam and Vitafoam with whom it jointly purchased chemicals in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act; a refutation of the claim that Loungefoam and Vitafoam were part of a single economic entity, alternatively an argument that if they were, that was as a result of collusion between Loungefoam and Vitafoam; and a prayer that the parent companies and constituent firms should all face administrative penalties.
  • The Tribunal decision - The Tribunal permitted all of the aforementioned amendments.
  • The CAC appeal - Feltex and the other respondents appealed to the CAC against the whole judgment of the Tribunal and further applied to have the decision reviewed and set aside. The CAC upheld the appeal and set aside the amendments allowed by the Tribunal.
  • On 3 June 2011, the Commission applied to the CAC for leave to appeal to the SCA only against the orders made in respect of the collusion and penalty amendments. That application was set down for hearing on 9 December 2011. On 27 December 2011 the Commission launched proceedings seeking leave to appeal directly to the ConCourt against the whole judgment of the CAC.

When determining its jurisdiction in both the Yara/Omnia case and the Loungefoam case, the ConCourt reasoned that if the Commission were to be granted leave to appeal, the issues to be decided upon relate to the extent of the Tribunal's power and its ability to permit the amendment of complaint referrals. In Competition Commission of South Africa v Senwes Limited  (the "Senwes case"), the ConCourt held that issues concerning the extent of the Tribunal's powers were, in fact, constitutional issues, giving the ConCourt jurisdiction to hear such appeals.

In both cases, when deciding whether to grant leave to appeal, the Court looked at section 63(2) of the Competition Act which states that an appeal to the ConCourt may only be brought with leave from the CAC, or if the CAC refuses to grant such leave, with leave from the SCA or the ConCourt (where the SCA or the CAC refuses).

The ConCourt did not consider it necessary to consider whether non-compliance with section 63(2) of the Competition Act constituted a bar to seeking leave to appeal to the ConCourt or whether such non-compliance must, merely, be taken into account as one of the factors relevant to determining whether or not it is in the interests of justice to grant the litigant leave to appeal to the ConCourt (as per section 167(6) of the Constitution, which does not lay down a requirement for obtaining leave to appeal from the court, the decision of which one is appealing).

The Court considered the extent of the Commission's delay in bringing its application in the Yara/Omnia case (some four and a half months from the date of the CAC's judgement) and, having regard to the 15 court days permitted therefor in terms of the Rules, considered such delay to be excessive.  The ConCourt stated further that the SCA should first be afforded the opportunity to hear and pronounce on the merits of the matter and held that it would not be in the interests of justice for it to hear the matter.

In the Loungefoam case, the Commission argued that –

  • the application raises critical constitutional issues fundamental to the manner in which it discharges its functions;
  • the finding that there must be symmetry between the initiating document and the referral is unduly restrictive and undermines the public's right to have anti-competitive conduct properly determined; and
  • it is unable to investigate and refer pending matters until the issues raised in the application have been attended to by the ConCourt.

As with the Yara/Omnia case, the Court considered the Commission's compliance in terms of section 63(2) of the Competition Act and section 167(6) of the Constitution. The Court held that neither of the aforementioned provisions had been complied with by the Commission and that the matter fell to be dismissed on this basis alone.

Accordingly, in both the Yara/Omnia case and the Loungefoam case, the Court held that, while it did have jurisdiction to hear the Commission's appeals, the Commission did not seek the requisite leave from the CAC before approaching the Court, nor did it show any compelling circumstances in the interests of justice that would justify a direct appeal to the ConCourt. The Commission's application for leave to appeal to the ConCourt was thus dismissed in both cases.

The decisions are no doubt a blow for the Commission.  Not only have these judgments not provided the Commission with the clarity it sought regarding its powers, they also awarded costs against the Commission.

But all is not lost for the Commission.  The judgements contain references to potentially strong merits in both cases and this may well sow the seed for successful appeals of the matters to the SCA.  Until then, respondents (both actual and potential) can take comfort that complaint referrals must be drafted at the outset with specificity as same cannot later be amended to introduce new complaints, causes of action, or joinder of further respondents.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions