South Africa: Constitutional Court Denies The Competition Commission Direct Access

Last Updated: 5 July 2012
Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2016

Article by Lee Mendelsohn , Derushka Chetty and Sarah Pearson (Candidate Attorney)

South Africa's Constitutional Court (the "ConCourt") has handed down its judgments in both the (i) Yara South Africa (Proprietary) Limited ("Yara") and Omnia Fertilizer Limited ("Omnia") case (the "Yara/Omnia case") and (ii) the Loungefoam (Proprietary) Limited ("Loungefoam") and Vitafoam (Proprietary) Limited ("Vitafoam") case (the "Loungefoam case"). The judgments, which were handed down yesterday, effectively deny the Competition Commission (the "Commission") leave to appeal the decisions of the Competition Appeal Court (the "CAC") in these matters directly to the ConCourt.

In an attempt to seek clarity on the scope and proper exercise of its statutory powers of complaint initiation, investigation and referral, the Commission sought to overturn the CAC's decisions in each of the Yara/Omnia case and the Loungefoam case.  In these cases, the CAC has ruled that the Commission could not amend its complaint referrals to introduce new evidence, allegations or join new respondents.

In the ordinary course, the avenues available to a would-be appellant seeking to appeal a CAC decision would be to:

  • seek leave from the CAC to appeal the matter to the Supreme Court of Appeal (the "SCA");  or
  • if the matter concerns a constitutional issue, seek leave from the CAC or the SCA (as the case may be) to appeal to the ConCourt. Leave from the ConCourt may be sought directly if the CAC or the SCA refuses leave or whether there is a necessity to seek leave directly, in the interests of justice.

The Commission chose to apply directly to the ConCourt for leave to appeal both these matters and in this way bypassed the CAC and the SCA.

The background of the Yara/Omnia case is as follows:

  • In December 2003 the Commission received a complaint from Nutri-Flo CC and Nutri-Fertiliser CC (the "Nutri-Flo complainants").  The Nutri-Flo complainants were producers and suppliers of blended fertilisers out of the raw material either manufactured or imported by Yara, Omnia, and Sasol Chemical Industries Proprietary ("Sasol").
  • Pursuant to the complaint, the Commission conducted an investigation and referred the complaint to the Competition Tribunal (the "Tribunal") for adjudication in terms of the Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998, as amended (the "Competition Act") citing Yara, Omnia and Sasol as the respondents.
  • After lengthy negotiations and a settlement agreement concluded between Sasol and the Commission, the Commission made it known, ahead of the hearing of the matter at the Tribunal, that it would use information received from Sasol to prove its complaint.
  • The Commission applied to the Tribunal to amend the complaint referral alleging collusive behaviour on the part of Yara and Omnia, which Yara and Omnia opposed on the basis that the proposed amendment fell outside the scope of the Nutri-Flo complaint.
  • Omnia brought a counter-application to have the referral of the complaint set aside on the basis that the Nutri-Flo complainants had not submitted any complaint concerning collusive behaviour by itself and Yara.
  • The Tribunal decision - On 24 February 2010, the Tribunal granted the Commission's application for leave to amend the referral to include allegations regarding collusive behaviour by Yara and Omnia and dismissed Omnia's counter-application.
  • The CAC decision - The matter was then appealed to the CAC and the appeal was upheld setting aside the Tribunal's aforementioned decisions.  The complaint referral against Yara and Omnia was thus set aside.
  • The Commission then applied for leave to appeal the CAC's decision directly to the ConCourt. In addition, the Commission applied to the CAC for leave to appeal against its decision to the SCA, but indicated that it would not pursue this application if leave to appeal to the ConCourt was granted.

The background of the Loungefoam case is as follows:

  • On 25 May 2007 the Commission received a letter from Mr. Troy Carelse, the owner of a foam manufacturing company in competition with Loungefoam and Vitafoam (manufacturers and suppliers of flexible polyurethane or block foam), alleging that Loungefoam and Vitafoam engaged in anti-competitive behaviour. The Commission subsequently commenced a formal complaint investigation on 3 September 2007 against Loungefoam and Vitafoam for price fixing, market allocation, exclusionary acts, inducement, predatory pricing and buying up scarce resources.
  • On 27 November 2007 the Commission initiated its own complaint alleging the same anti-competitive conduct against four additional parties, including Feltex Holdings (Proprietary) Limited ("Feltex") in order to expand the scope of the complaint process previously initiated.  The purpose of this step was, according to the initiating statement, to add the additional parties to the referral as they were implicated in conduct prohibited by the Competition Act based on documents obtained from Loungefoam and Vitafoam during the investigation process.
  • On 26 May 2008, a further complaint initiation followed, expanding the investigation to include Steinhoff International Holdings (Proprietary) Limited ("Steinhoff") and Kap International Holdings (Proprietary) Limited ("Kap").  This was consequent to the Commission's suspicion that the alleged collusion between the original respondents might be a product of collusion between Steinhoff and Kap.
  • In September 2008, the Commission referred a complaint to the Tribunal against Loungefoam, Vitafoam, Feltex, Steinhoff and Kap alleging that (i) Loungefoam and Vitafoam had agreed to fix purchase prices and selling prices in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act; (ii) Loungefoam and Vitafoam had engaged in customer allocation by agreeing not to compete for customers in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act; and (iii) Loungefoam and Feltex had engaged in market division through the reciprocal restraint of trade covenant in their sale of business agreement in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Competition Act.
  • On 16 February 2010, the Commission applied to the Tribunal to amend its complaint referral in respect of various aspects which included new allegations that Feltex was involved in price fixing with Loungefoam and Vitafoam with whom it jointly purchased chemicals in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act; a refutation of the claim that Loungefoam and Vitafoam were part of a single economic entity, alternatively an argument that if they were, that was as a result of collusion between Loungefoam and Vitafoam; and a prayer that the parent companies and constituent firms should all face administrative penalties.
  • The Tribunal decision - The Tribunal permitted all of the aforementioned amendments.
  • The CAC appeal - Feltex and the other respondents appealed to the CAC against the whole judgment of the Tribunal and further applied to have the decision reviewed and set aside. The CAC upheld the appeal and set aside the amendments allowed by the Tribunal.
  • On 3 June 2011, the Commission applied to the CAC for leave to appeal to the SCA only against the orders made in respect of the collusion and penalty amendments. That application was set down for hearing on 9 December 2011. On 27 December 2011 the Commission launched proceedings seeking leave to appeal directly to the ConCourt against the whole judgment of the CAC.

When determining its jurisdiction in both the Yara/Omnia case and the Loungefoam case, the ConCourt reasoned that if the Commission were to be granted leave to appeal, the issues to be decided upon relate to the extent of the Tribunal's power and its ability to permit the amendment of complaint referrals. In Competition Commission of South Africa v Senwes Limited  (the "Senwes case"), the ConCourt held that issues concerning the extent of the Tribunal's powers were, in fact, constitutional issues, giving the ConCourt jurisdiction to hear such appeals.

In both cases, when deciding whether to grant leave to appeal, the Court looked at section 63(2) of the Competition Act which states that an appeal to the ConCourt may only be brought with leave from the CAC, or if the CAC refuses to grant such leave, with leave from the SCA or the ConCourt (where the SCA or the CAC refuses).

The ConCourt did not consider it necessary to consider whether non-compliance with section 63(2) of the Competition Act constituted a bar to seeking leave to appeal to the ConCourt or whether such non-compliance must, merely, be taken into account as one of the factors relevant to determining whether or not it is in the interests of justice to grant the litigant leave to appeal to the ConCourt (as per section 167(6) of the Constitution, which does not lay down a requirement for obtaining leave to appeal from the court, the decision of which one is appealing).

The Court considered the extent of the Commission's delay in bringing its application in the Yara/Omnia case (some four and a half months from the date of the CAC's judgement) and, having regard to the 15 court days permitted therefor in terms of the Rules, considered such delay to be excessive.  The ConCourt stated further that the SCA should first be afforded the opportunity to hear and pronounce on the merits of the matter and held that it would not be in the interests of justice for it to hear the matter.

In the Loungefoam case, the Commission argued that –

  • the application raises critical constitutional issues fundamental to the manner in which it discharges its functions;
  • the finding that there must be symmetry between the initiating document and the referral is unduly restrictive and undermines the public's right to have anti-competitive conduct properly determined; and
  • it is unable to investigate and refer pending matters until the issues raised in the application have been attended to by the ConCourt.

As with the Yara/Omnia case, the Court considered the Commission's compliance in terms of section 63(2) of the Competition Act and section 167(6) of the Constitution. The Court held that neither of the aforementioned provisions had been complied with by the Commission and that the matter fell to be dismissed on this basis alone.

Accordingly, in both the Yara/Omnia case and the Loungefoam case, the Court held that, while it did have jurisdiction to hear the Commission's appeals, the Commission did not seek the requisite leave from the CAC before approaching the Court, nor did it show any compelling circumstances in the interests of justice that would justify a direct appeal to the ConCourt. The Commission's application for leave to appeal to the ConCourt was thus dismissed in both cases.

The decisions are no doubt a blow for the Commission.  Not only have these judgments not provided the Commission with the clarity it sought regarding its powers, they also awarded costs against the Commission.

But all is not lost for the Commission.  The judgements contain references to potentially strong merits in both cases and this may well sow the seed for successful appeals of the matters to the SCA.  Until then, respondents (both actual and potential) can take comfort that complaint referrals must be drafted at the outset with specificity as same cannot later be amended to introduce new complaints, causes of action, or joinder of further respondents.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.