South Africa: Recent Significant Admiralty Court Judgments

Last Updated: 9 March 2012
Article by Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2018

The Supreme Court of Appeal clarifies the approach to making out a prima facie case in security arrest proceedings

The requirement of a prima facie case has been said to be satisfied if a claimant shows that there is evidence which, if accepted, will establish a cause of action and that the mere fact that such evidence put up by the claimant is contradicted will not mean that the test has not been satisfied - not even if the probabilities are against it; it is only where it is quite clear that the claimant has no action, or cannot succeed, that a prima facie case will not be made out. In this judgment the Supreme Court of Appeal indicated that there is much to be said for taking into account facts established by the debtor that the claimant does not contradict, at least where there is no reason to believe that in future proceedings, with the advantages of discovery those facts are capable of being challenged.

It, furthermore, held, first, that where the claimant asks the court to draw factual inferences from the evidence they must be inferences that can reasonably be drawn from it, even if they need not be the only possible inferences from that evidence. If they are tenuous or far-fetched the onus is not discharged. Second, the drawing of inferences from the facts must be based on objective proven facts and not conjecture or speculation.

With regard to expert evidence, including foreign law, the court referred with approval to the judgment in the matter of National Justice Compania Naviera S.A. v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd (the "Ikarian Reefer") [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 68 [QB (Com)] at 81 to 82 for the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses and reiterated that it is undesirable that a representative of the parties give such evidence. In relation to whether a prima facie case is made out in respect of expert evidence the court held that the underlying facts relied on by the witness must have been established on a prima facie basis. If not then the expert's opinion is worthless and must be disregarded because it is purely hypothetical, based on facts that cannot be demonstrated even on a prima facie basis. If the relevant facts and any others that are undisputed or cannot be disputed are established on a prima facie basis then the expert's view must be one that can reasonably be held on the basis of those facts. If the opinion is one that can reasonably be held on the basis of the facts and the chain of reasoning of the expert a prima facie case is made in that respect. This is so even though that is not the only opinion that can reasonably be expressed on the basis of those facts. However, if the opinion is far-fetched and based on unproven hypotheses then a prima facie case has not been made.

Foreign law is treated as a fact required to be proved by tendering the evidence of a witness who can speak to the contents of that law. However, such evidence is unnecessary where the law in question, such as English admiralty and maritime law, can be ascertained readily and with sufficient certainty without recourse to the evidence of an expert, because the court is then entitled to take judicial notice of such law. In those circumstances it should generally speaking be unnecessary for it to be presented through affidavits from practitioners.

With regard to the quantum of the claim the court held that the claimant is entitled to security in an amount determined on the basis of its reasonably arguable best case but that this is subject to proving a need for security in the amount claimed on a balance of probabilities in terms of the further requirement that the claimant show a genuine and reasonable need for security.

MVS "Pasquale della Gatta" and "Filippo Lembo" : Imperial Marine Co v Deiulemar Compagnia di Navigazione SPA 2012 (1) SA 58 (SCA)

The Supreme Court of Appeal clarifies the principles applicable to determining whether counter-security ought to be granted

Section 5(2) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, No. 105 of 1983 ("the Act") provides -

"A court may in the exercise of its admiralty jurisdiction -
(a) ...;
(b) order any person to give security for costs or any claim;
(c) order that any arrest or attachment made or to be made or that anything done or to be done in terms of this Act or any order of the court be subject to such conditions as to the court appears just, whether as to the furnishing of security or the liability for costs, expenses, loss or damage caused or likely to be caused, or otherwise; ...."

The Supreme Court of Appeal referred with approval to the judgment in the matter of mv "Heavy Metal" : Belfry Marine Ltd v Palm Base Maritime SDN BHD 2000 (1) SA 286 (C) where the court said:

'In the first place, it is evident that s 5(2)(a) – (c) of the statute vests the Court with a wide power, in its discretion, to order that security or counter-security be furnished for claims and counterclaims. Secondly, confining myself to counterclaims, clearly the Court must have jurisdiction, which is invariably present in the circumstances. Thirdly, it seems to me that an applicant must show at least a prima facie case in respect of its counterclaim(s). I say at least because less would not warrant security, while in my view more may be required in an appropriate case. Fourthly, I think an applicant must show a genuine and reasonable need for security .... Finally, the Court has a discretion which in my opinion should not be unduly circumscribed. All sorts of factors can arise in different cases which may affect the exercise of the discretion, such as whether the arrest was in terms of s 5(3); the location of the forum; whether the arresting party is a peregrinus of this Court; the nature of the counterclaims; and the effect that a forfeiture order may have on the arrestor's position.... The list is not exhaustive. The Court may find itself weighing and balancing competing interests. The strength of the counterclaimant's case on the merits may then become a factor to be weighed in the balance. It follows from all this that I do not necessarily find myself in the sparing school of thought, but that I do recognise a substantial need for caution.'

The Supreme Court went on to say that in determining the quantum of any counter-security the court may also have to exercise a discretion. A litigant is entitled to security in an amount determined on the basis of its reasonably arguable best case. That requires the existence of the claim to be established on a prima facie basis and the quantum of security to be determined on the basis of the amount representing the reasonably arguable best case in respect of that claim. The need for security in the amounts claimed must be established on a balance of probabilities. However, the computation of those amounts may not always be straightforward and may require the court to exercise a discretion in determining the quantum of the counter-security to which the litigant is entitled.

MVS "Pasquale della Gatta" and "Filippo Lembo" : Imperial Marine Co v Deiulemar Compagnia di Navigazione SPA 2012 (1) SA 58 (SCA)

Arrests for Security for Costs and the South African Associated Ship Provisions

The claimant arrested the mv "Behice" for security for the costs of an arbitration and appeal proceedings against a yard in respect of a ship building dispute, the principal claim and interest having already been secured. The owner of the arrested vessel set the arrest application down for reconsideration. It argued that costs are not "enforceable" as required by the South African security arrest provisions until an award or judgment for costs is made or granted and the costs assessed. The KwaZulu Natal High Court, Durban disagreed, holding that as the claim was provable together with the principal claim it was enforceable.

Owners of the arrested vessel also argued that the claim in respect of costs had not arisen at a time when the new building concerned was owned by Furtrans (being a prerequisite for proceeding with an associated ship arrest in South Africa) but only after the vessel had been sold on by it to another party. In that respect the court again disagreed, holding that the original source of the undertaking to pay costs could be found in the agreement to arbitrate which existed at the time the yard owned the new building.

MV "Behice" : Plaus Shipping Ltd v Augusta Due SRL (unreported judgment, Kwazulu Natal High Court, Durban, Case No, A112/2011, 25 November 2011).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions