ARTICLE
10 February 2016

Claims Preparation Costs Clarified By The South African High Court

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
The on-going debate regarding CPC's has been clarified in a High Court judgement granted on 3 February 2016.
South Africa Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The on-going debate regarding CPC's has been clarified in a High Court judgement granted on 3 February 2016.

The judge held that it was clear that CPC's were "aimed at compensating the insured in respect of those particulars of details that the defendant had requested and not those costs the plaintiff incurred of its own accord and in order to determine the costs of reinstating the property".

Each case would need to be dealt with on their own facts, and the particular policy wording.

The observations made by the judge do however accord with the views which we have expressed consistently in the past.

Claims Preparation Costs Clarified By The South African High Court

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More