ARTICLE
17 February 2020

Mexico Issues Regulations To Approve Biologic Drugs

O
OLIVARES

Contributor

Our mission is to provide innovative solutions and highly specialized legal advice for clients facing the most complicated legal and business challenges in Mexico. OLIVARES is continuously at the forefront of new practice areas concerning copyright, litigation, regulatory, anti-counterfeiting, plant varieties, domain names, digital rights, and internet-related matters, and the firm has been responsible for precedent-setting decisions in patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Our firm is committed to developing the strongest group of legal professionals to manage the level of complexity and interdisciplinary orientation that clients require. During the first decade of the 21st century, the team successfully led efforts to reshape IP laws and change regulatory authorizations procedures in Mexico, not only through thought leadership and lobbying efforts, but the firm has also won several landmark and precedent-setting cases at the Mexican Federal and Supreme Courts levels, including in constitutional matters.
A decree was recently published modifying several provisions of the Health Law Regulations addressing the approval of biologic drugs.
Mexico Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

A decree was recently published modifying several provisions of the Health Law Regulations addressing the approval of biologic drugs. The main points of interest are:

– The provision included in the law stating that Mexico will allow for approval of follow-ons as “biocomparables” is regulated in more detail.

– Commonly, a biocomparable drug will make reference to a previously registered innovator drug. If the innovator drug has not been authorized in Mexico, a previously registered biocomparable drug can serve as reference. The significance of this provision lies in that a biocomparable can be the first drug of its kind in our country, in the event that a developer delays a request for approval.

– Concerning prescription requirements, a provision states that prescriptions must contain the INN of the active ingredient. The commercial name is optional.

– Clinical trials for innovator biologics must take place in Mexico in all cases, when the drug will be manufactured in our Country.

– For drugs manufactured abroad, the Ministry of Health can request clinical trial to take place in Mexico, when considered necessary by a Biologic Products Committee (Subcomité de Evaluación de Productos Biotecnológicos)

– For the approval of biocomparable drugs, preclinical and clinical trials can be requested, according to what is determined by the Ministry of Heath, in specific rules to be further published.

– The regulations also state that the reach of biocomparability clinical trials will be supported by evidence of active ingredient characterization, and that, as such characterization improves;, the amount of required trials will decrease.

– An 8 year Bolar type exemption1 is included concerning requests for approval of biocomparables when an innovator drug is covered by a patent.

– There is no indication of a Data Protection period. This was to be expected, as Mexico still has not implemented Data Protection for chemical drugs.

– Once a project of authorization request for either innovators or biocomparables has been approved by the corresponding committee and submitted, the Federal Commission for Protection against Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS) has a 180 day period to decide on the application, with a possibility to issue a single requirement of additional information, which will have to be complied in 100 days. Upon expiration of these periods, applications will be understood as denied.

Although industry participants welcome these regulations, specific rules to approve biocomparables are still pending.

Footnote

1This is a research exemption from patent infringement allowing a generic manufacturer to request a marketing authorization and perform the necessary studies for that purpose under the condition that the authorization will not be granted until after the patent expires. The term “Bolar” is used as reference to Roche Products v. Bolar Pharmaceutical, 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More