Jersey: Guidance From The Royal Court For Trustees

Last Updated: 8 December 2008
Article by Michael Cushing

Where a Jersey based trustee is proposing to make a "momentous" decision in relation to a trust, the trustee will generally be best advised to seek the blessing of the court before putting that decision into effect.

The Jersey authorities in relation to applications for the court's approval of a trustee's decision are well established. In summary, the court must be satisfied that the trustee's opinion on the decision it wishes to take has been made in good faith, that the opinion is one of a reasonable trustee and that its decision has not been invalidated by any actual or potential conflict of interest. Importantly, the court's role on an application for approval of a trustee's decision does not extend to substituting its decision for that of the trustee. Accordingly, where a trustee is seeking the court's approval for its proposed course of action, the court may only vary the trustee's decision if it is one which no reasonable trustee could have made. Thus, provided the trustee's decision falls within the range of decisions which a reasonable trustee could have made, the court cannot substitute its own decision simply because it would have reached a different decision.

In the recent case of Re A Trustees Limited [2008] JRC097, the Royal Court was faced with an application for approval of a trustee's decision in circumstances where the court considered that the decision was influenced by a conflict of interest on the part of the trustee, which was the trustee of a Jersey discretionary trust.

Following the separation of the husband and wife (who were both beneficiaries of the trust), arrangements had been agreed in relation to the financial provision of the wife which involved the creation of a sub-fund from the trust. The sub-fund was for the benefit of the wife, the children of the marriage and remoter issue. It was revocable and contained substantial assets.

In the face of impending fiscal changes in the UK brought about by the Finance Act 2008, the wife asked the trustee to advance substantial assets from the sub-fund to her before 6 April 2008. The request included a request that £11 million (representing approximately half of the sub-fund) be advanced. The request was supported by tax advice obtained in the UK by the wife. Having sought its own advice through English tax counsel, the trustee decided on 2 April 2008 not to advance the £11 million requested, but rather to advance a sum in the region of £1.5 to £2.5 million to the wife and sought the Royal Court's approval of that decision. The application to the Royal Court was heard on 3 April 2008, one working day before the 6 April 2008 deadline.

It is clear from the judgment of the Royal Court that the court considered the proposals which had been put forward by the wife to be entirely reasonable. Indeed, the court stated that it could not understand why the trustee was reluctant to give substantial effect to what it described as properly thought out and reasonable requests based on professional legal and tax advice. The court formed the view that the trustee's reluctance to give effect to the proposals of the wife was as a result of concerns which it had in relation to proceedings ancillary to the divorce of the husband and the wife in England and the potential impact on the husband of those proceedings. The court stated that the trustee did not appear to have considered the potential for conflict between its roles as trustee of the trust (with power to revoke the sub-fund) and as trustee of the sub-fund, in circumstances in which the husband and the wife were estranged and where divorce proceedings were yet to be finalised. It is clear from the judgment that the court formed the view that had the trustee been the trustee of the sub-fund only, there could be no good reason for it not to give substantial effect to the request of the wife.

The court went on to find that the trustee's decision was not a decision of a reasonable trustee and was a decision which had been influenced by a conflict of interest. The court formed the view that this was a case where the wife was entitled to have a decision made independently of any competing duty and that it was appropriate, therefore, for the court to interfere with the exercise of the trustee's powers and to direct the trustee to make the requested distribution to the wife.

In reaching its decision the court restated the general principle that beneficiaries are entitled to require that the decisions of trustees are made independently of any competing duty. The court also provided some guidance as to how a trustee might successfully manage conflicts and cited the judgment of Hart J in Public Trustee v Cooper (20 December 1999) where three possible ways of managing a conflict were identified. These were:

  • For the trustee to resign (although this may not always be practicable).
  • For the trustee to surrender its discretion to the court (where the conflict is so pervasive that this is the only practical alternative).
  • For the trustee to proceed to make its own decision in circumstances where despite a conflict existing, the trustee considers that it may honestly and reasonably believe that it can fairly and reasonably take the decision. In these circumstances the court stated that it would be prudent for the trustee to seek the court's approval of its decision in advance since if it does not, it faces the risk of having to demonstrate in hostile litigation both that the decision was one which any reasonable body of trustees might have taken and also that the decision was not in fact influenced by the conflict.

In this case, and despite the failure on the part of the trustee to acknowledge any conflict of interest, the court considered that the trustee had acted prudently in bringing its decision to the court in advance of implementing the decision and the trustee was ultimately awarded its costs of the application out of the sub-fund. The court reiterated the significant benefit of applying to court for directions prior to implementing a momentous decision – that is to avoid the potential for hostile litigation by disaffected beneficiaries. The court went on to encourage such applications and stated that where such an application is made, the court should be slow to penalise a trustee whose decision is not in fact approved.

This article first appeared in the autumn 2008 issue of Appleby Jersey's Resolution newsletter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions