Jersey: Frozen Funds - Jersey’s Royal Court Provides Guidance On The Options For The Customer And The Duties Of The Financial Institution

Last Updated: 18 September 2008
Article by Matthew Thompson, Steve Meiklejohn and Edward Mackereth

Most Read Contributor in Jersey, September 2018

On 25 April 2008, the Jersey Royal Court handed down an important judgment (Re: Representation Gichuru) detailing the options for the customer of a financial institution whose funds have been subject to an informal freeze following the filing of a Suspicious Activity Report ("SAR"), and where the police have refused to consent to payments on the account being made.

In brief, the facts of the case were that the customer opened a bank account in 1981 and, in 2002, the institution filed an SAR. The police declined to give the institution consent to make any payments, and that lack of consent has been maintained throughout. In August 2007, the customer issued a Representation seeking an order that the institution must pay over the assets.

The first question before the Court was whether the customer had any legal remedies and, if so, what those remedies were. The Court held that the customer had two options.

The customer can either submit the police's refusal of consent to judicial review, or bring a private law action against the financial institution for the return of the funds. In a private law action, the issues for the Court are likely to be whether the funds belong to the customer and, if so, whether they are the proceeds of criminal conduct.

The second question before the Court was the extent to which the police should be involved if the customer chose to bring a private law action against the financial institution.

The financial institution argued that it was not the party best placed to test whether or not the funds were the proceeds of criminal conduct, because the financial institution is unlikely to have anything more than a suspicion (although, with the introduction of an objective test for suspicion, it may not even have that). In contrast, the police will have taken the decision not to consent to the financial institution making the payment, and the police will be the body taking the investigation forward. The institution's argument was therefore that the real dispute lay between the police and the customer (because the police are the party blocking the transaction) and that the police are normally best placed to explain to the Court why the funds should not be released. For both those reasons, it was contended that the police should routinely be convened to such private law actions.

The Attorney General's response was that the police refusal to consent would have been based on the grounds of suspicion, and they should not be forced to defend that decision on a different basis, namely, that the funds are in fact the proceeds of criminal conduct. The Attorney General also contended that there was a real risk of prejudicing investigations and prosecutions if the police could be forced by the customer to explain their actions in Court before they were ready to initiate criminal proceedings.

The Decision

The Court held that for the reasons given by the Attorney General, the police should not ordinarily be convened in private law actions. The Court held that the financial institution is "under a duty to contest the customer's claim in such circumstances and must lay before the Court all available evidence which justifies their suspicion". The Court held that, in order to protect itself, and once the customer has established that it did deposit the money and has demanded payment, the financial institution must "prove on the balance of probabilities that it has the requisite suspicion, which then entitles it to refuse to pay unless the police consent or the Court so orders". The Court continued that the burden then reverts to the customer to prove on the balance of probabilities that the funds are not the proceeds of criminal conduct.

The Court remarked that the current state of affairs is capable of causing great hardship and unfairness and repeated the recommendation of the Royal Court in Minwalla that consideration be given to amending the current legislation so as to avoid the difficulties and potential injustice that it can give rise to.

The Implications For Financial Institutions

Financial institutions will find themselves being put in a very difficult position. On the one hand, the threshold for suspicion is very low (the Shorter OED refers to an "imagination of something . . . as possible or likely" and "a notion, an inkling"). The adoption of the objective test for suspicion means that the employee within the financial institution may not even have a suspicion. Yet, based on such slender foundations, if the lack of consent is challenged, the institution is not only bound to report to the Court the facts as it sees them and face cross-examination on the issue, but is also put under a specific duty to contest the customer's claim.

Institutions should, however, take some comfort from this decision since it makes it clear that, if an SAR has been filed with the police, it is for the customer to explain why monies provided to the institution are not the proceeds of crime. An institution will be able to review such information against its previous understanding of the purpose for which the customer sought to use the institution's services. The court also emphasised that it did not regard applications of this kind as appropriate for summary ruling and that a trial would be almost inevitable.

What is of concern is that, contrary to the views expressed by the English Courts, the decision will mean that the reasons why the institutions formed the view it was suspicious will inevitably be explored before the Courts.

Institutions will also be required to have an ongoing dialogue with the police to keep them informed of developments in any litigation brought by a customer, presumably so that the police can decide whether to intervene or whether to apply for a saisie judiciaire under Article 16 of the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999. The decision does regrettably continue to leave institutions in an uncertain position pending a decision by the police.

Furthermore, the judgment does not address the potential conflict between the duty to lay before the Court all available evidence, and the criminal liability resulting from a breach of the tipping-off provisions. Although it is likely that, once a private law action has been brought by the customer, the police will in most instances accept that there is no longer any danger of tipping off, it is feasible that the institution will have evidence (perhaps linking the customer to other accounts or otherwise feeding into a larger picture) which the police will not want to be disclosed. In that case, the institution may find itself in a Catch 22 situation, where it is simultaneously obliged to act as the first line of defence against money laundering whilst not being permitted to disclose the information with which to fulfil that obligation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions