Jersey: Notes From A Few Small Islands

Last Updated: 19 July 2006
Article by Huw Thomas and Matthew Thompson

Most Read Contributor in Jersey, September 2016

Huw Thomas and Matthew Thompson of Ogier provide an employment law perspective from the jurisdictions of Jersey, Guernsey and the Cayman Islands

A global approach to HR means that clients and their advisers must come to terms with the differing approaches to employment law taken in the key offshore jurisdictions of the Cayman Islands, Jersey and Guernsey. In terms of employment protection, all three jurisdictions draw to varying degrees from previously enacted UK legislation.

In particular, however, mechanisms used in the three jurisdictions relating to liability for unfair dismissal are derived from PartX of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (or its antecedents). UK unfair dismissal law has its roots in the Industrial Relations Act 1971. It is worth noting that this Act grew out of the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers Associations in 1968 – which was primarily concerned with collective employment rights rather than individual employment rights. The Actwas an attempt to provide a general reform of labour law and to place trade union relations on a statutory footing.

While the Act itself did not survive for more than three years – it was repealed by the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974 – the unfair dismissal provisions were re-enacted almost in their entirety and, subsequently amended, are now contained in PartX of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in much the same form. But recent legislation has radically changed the way in which disciplinary and grievance issues are handled. The 1971 Act introduced a specialist industrial relations court – the National Industrial Relations Court. The idea that industrial relations, and particularly individual employment rights, required a specialist tribunal was radical. While in Guernsey, Jersey and the Cayman Islands, the idea was to keep formality and the presence of lawyers to a minimum, the sheer complexity of modern employment law has driven the involvement of the legal profession – and often highly specialised members of the legal profession at that.

Collective rights

The 1971 Act incorporated two new and interlocking themes. Individuals were given a statutory right to complain of ‘unfair’ dismissal; in addition, they were given the right to join a registered trade union and, just as importantly, not join a union. Registration gave unions certain bargaining rights in relation to employers. It is notable that it tied together individual and collective rights in the belief that the two were indivisible. Since that time, individual employment rights have arguably been the dominant theme of UK employment law – although industrial relations on a collective scale remain undeniably important.

Displaying a lack of flair for originality, a similar initial process is happening in Jersey. The Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 provides a raft of individual employment rights, including the right to paid annual leave, a minimum wage and the right to claim unfair dismissal in certain circumstances for qualifying workers. In addition, collective employment rights are to be provided under the Employment Relations (Jersey) Law, which at the time of writing was still awaiting final approval.

This draft law is likely to be amended prior to enforcement, under proposals lodged by Jersey’s Minister forSocial Security that will enable the Jersey Employment Tribunal to make binding orders in relation to recognition requests by trade unions where an employer employs 21 or more employees.

Such attention to trade union and other collective issues is notable by its absence in Guernsey law (although a limited power of intervention in industrial disputes exists under the Industrial Disputes and Conditions of Employment (Guernsey) Law 1993). Guernsey has had a UK-based employment law since 1998, under the Employment Protection (Guernsey) Law 1998, which came into force in 1999. In the same way, the Labour Law 1987 (2001 revision) in the Cayman Islands does not address collective employment issues, although there is separate legislation dealing with trade union issues. Trade union activity is almost non-existent in the Cayman Islands, in contrast to the Channel Islands’ public sector.

Jersey v Guernsey

It would seem that the government in Jersey is following a more interventionist path than that of its near neighbour Guernsey. A non-employment relation example is the Competition (Jersey) Law 2005, which imports a UK standard of competition compliance; Guernsey has rejected such a move, notwithstanding the fact that it has many of the same economic concerns as Jersey.

However, Guernsey is well ahead in the development of individual rights – it has had unfair dismissal protection since 1998 (the Employment Protection Law 1998) and it has enacted sex discrimination legislation that is similar, but not identical to, the UK’s Sex Discrimination Act 1975. The declared intention in Guernsey is to enact legislation covering a range of discrimination issues. In addition, Guernsey was several years ahead of Jersey in enacting a data protection regime equivalent to the UK Data Protection Act 1998. Guernsey has also extended its unfair dismissal regime. The compensatory award is now a fixed sum of six months’ basic salary, with a discretion for the tribunal to reduce the amount where appropriate. The qualification period to bring a claim has dropped to a year and employees have three months to bring a claim. Guernsey has also instituted a specialist tribunal to deal with employment and discrimination matters.

In Jersey, the intention is to introduce employment law in phases. Phase one, now largely complete, includes the introduction of a minimum wage, unfair dismissal legislation and various collective rights concerning trade unions. Phase two, which is likely to begin in late 2006 and continue into 2007, is to include further individual rights relating to redundancy, maternity, equal pay and equal opportunities, and issues regarding discrimination in the workplace.

It is also likely to include flexible working and familyfriendly policies and the protection of employees involved in business mergers and acquisitions.

Ultimate aims

To UK legal practitioners and HR professionals, nothing about this programme will appear unfamiliar or controversial. But should Jersey (and other small jurisdictions) go down this route? It largely depends upon what employment law is for. In jurisdictions such as Guernsey, Jersey and the Cayman Islands, where the problem is normally not too much labour (and thus unemployment) but too little labour, the function of employment law is likely to be quite different from their near neighbours France and the UK. The potential downside is also much greater – if unemployment is the result of more employment regulation then it is difficult to see who benefits from greater protection of this nature. Instead, the function of employment law in these jurisdictions is more likely to be linked to two primary considerations – the type of employment rights that should be provided to employees and/or workers in a modern society, and those employment rights that make the economy work better and more flexibly.

The risk of the phased approach being followed by Jersey is twofold: the first is that, by its concentration on collective employment rights, it appears to be making an already tight employment market more inflexible rather than less; and the second is that it disregards elements that ought to be a priority, such as measures to encourage flexible working and which would assist Jersey in getting themost out of a workforce that is limited in size.

It is noticeable that many larger organisations in Jersey have already adopted measures – such as maternity rights and/or flexible working – out of necessity; in a tight labour market, employees often look more to such issues when deciding where they are going to work.

Instead of this arguably more pragmatic and modern approach, it is proposed that it would be automatically unfair in Jersey to dismiss employees taking duly authorised industrial action – with no time limit on that protection. This dwarfs the protection given to UK employees engaged in similar action, who are protected for the first 12 weeks of any such action. Quite why Jersey employees require such protection is unclear.

Although, as noted, Guernsey is ahead in terms of individual provision, there is a concern that it, too, is adhering too closely to the UK approach rather than developing legislation appropriate to its circumstances. The Sex Discrimination (Employment) (Guernsey) Ordinance 2005 is, while laudable in its aims, a highly complex piece of legislation that will take a long time to come to terms with for both employers and employees. Perhaps the right to take maternity leave might have been a better starting point.

The Cayman Islands

In comparison to the Channel Islands – which prior to 1998 (in the case of Guernsey) and 2003 (in the case of Jersey) had nothing much more than minimum notice periods and requirements for a written statement of terms – the Cayman Islands have, at least, addressed many of the individual employment rights that would be considered fundamental in the UK . Examples are unfair dismissal and basic rights to maternity leave and maternity pay.

While the Cayman approach would not be considered particularly generous in UK terms in relation to those rights, it has at least adopted them. What is notable about the Cayman law is its relative lack of resemblance to the UK. Certain provisions bear some similarity, such as the basic provisions governing unfair dismissal, but it is largely an indigenous creation. The reason for this is the Cayman Islands’ proximity to, and close ties with, North America. These factors caused a number of North American labour relation concepts to be imported into the labour law, such as ‘severance’ pay and ‘workers’ compensation rights’.

In addition, the difference in style is quite striking: the Cayman approach is substantially more prescriptive than the primary Channel Islands law, governing probationary periods, severance pay, retirement and/or resignation allowances, health and safety (which is treated separately in the Channel Islands), sick leave, sick pay and maternity and adoption rights. Discrimination in the employment context is dealt with in a single section (s80 of the Employment Law 1987 (2001 revision)) and is the subject of criminal sanctions.

The current 2001 law does not apply to those working in public services, charitable organisations or churches. Employment issues are decided in a labour tribunal or the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands.

In 2004 the Cayman Islands passed a law – the Employment Law 2004 – which (if and when it comes into force) will replace and update the previous legislation. The 2004 law does include some new elements. In particular, it deals with paternity leave and working time, and introduces a formal regime for disciplinary and performancewarnings. It also sets out standard draft contracts, warning letters and other employment-related documentation – something almost entirely absent in the Channel Islands approach.

The changes that the 2004 law will bring in practice are uncertain. Among the effects of Hurricane Ivan upon the Cayman Islands was the shelving of the new law, perhaps indefinitely. However, it is clear that the development of Caymanian employment law is not finished and that there is considerable movement for further change.

Practical management

If following the UK legislative example gives rise to problems, departure from that example can create just as many problems, especially for HR practitioners attempting to address issues across more than one jurisdiction. For example, in the UK, unfair dismissal protection (together with certain other elements of employment protection) is limited to employees – those who work under a contract of service. However, Jersey employment protection is extended to workers – those under an obligation to perform work personally, save those in a client/provider relationship or where such workers can be said to be employed by an agency. Guernsey, by contrast, limits protection to employees. While this can be straightforward, it does mean that Jersey employers must ensure that all of their workers (employees or not) get paid holiday, rest periods, bank holidays off (or time off in lieu), and a written statement of pay. Such workers also accrue unfair dismissal protection. This can lead to problems. Historically it has been assumed that contract workers can be disposed of easily and without risk, but not any more.

A related issue is the new Sex Discrimination (Employment) (Guernsey) Ordinance 2005 that came into force on 30 March 2006. It applies to those workers engaged other than under a contract of service and it has differing application depending upon whether such workers are engaged directly or through an intervening corporate vehicle, and will therefore require care on the part of HR practitioners.

In particular, where different laws adopt differing definitions of what an ‘employee’ is, employers must ensure that they are clear on the nature and extent of their duties. The sheer complexity of the new law is likely to mean that some employers will learn the hard way.

Procedural points

It is well established in UK law that a procedural failing will in most circumstances be fatal to an employer’s prospects of successfully defending an unfair dismissal claim. The harshness of this statutory position is mitigated by the availability of a certain amount of discretion awarded to employment tribunals to reduce awards (eg contributory fault reductions and/or Polkey reductions).

While Jersey has adopted the insistence on procedural propriety from the UK, it has not softened that stance by giving the tribunal any ability to reduce awards. This means that injustice is likely to arise where employers commit technical failings in their procedures while being overwhelmingly in the right so far as the merits of a particular case go.

Awards in Guernsey, Jersey and the Cayman Islands are to a large extent fixed. In Guernsey, unfair dismissal will result in an award of six months’ basic pay (with a discretion for the tribunal to reduce awards in certain circumstances). In Jersey and, practically speaking, the Cayman Islands, there is a sliding scale of compensation for unfair dismissal based on length of service and, in the case of Jersey, no discretion to reduce.

Given that the maximum award in both Jersey and Guernsey is six months’ basic salary (a point reached after five years of continuous employment), and in the Cayman Islands it is 12 weeks’wages (which is basic salary and benefits), the approach to risk when considering disciplinary and/or performance-related issues must be tailored accordingly.

In addition, caremust be taken to ensure that the operation of procedures is correct – cutting corners and/or failing to ensure that hearings and appeals are not compromised is likely to result in a fixed award by the tribunal, particularly in Jersey. The extension of the unfair dismissal regime in Guernsey means that procedural propriety is also more important than ever from an HR point of view.

Different channels

It should be born in mind that, notwithstanding the apparent similarity of Guernsey and Jersey to the UK, they are very different legal environments. The contract law of the two Channel Islands’ jurisdictions is largely based on Norman customary law, although in practice the courts often adopt English law principles. This means that assumptions cannot readily bemade about the easy transposition of English procedures and documentation. The Cayman Islands are closer to the UK when it comes to contract law and much underlying law. Assumptions are easier to make, butmust be tempered with local common law decisions.

In the final analysis, it is inevitable that organisations will need to manage HR functions across several jurisdictions, particularly where the organisation operates in a number of relatively small offshore locations. The scarcity of HR expertise and the necessity to gain cost savings from centralising functions demand this. However, it should never be simply assumed that procedures and practice can be standardised to an absolute extent. The value of local knowledge of the law, culture, and standard practice in each location cannot be overstated.

The legal risks of getting it wrong are well known; the commercial risk and cost of failing to recruit and retain staff due to poor and/or insensitive HR and management practice, is less obvious. But it is likely to be far greater than the limited legal penalties which might arise.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.