Italy: A Gangway Detached From A Cruise Ship. Harbour Station, Port Authority, Gangway Manufacturer And Master Of The Ship: Who Is Responsible?

Last Updated: 8 October 2018
Article by Simone Gaggero

With a recent judgment1 the first criminal division of the Court of Genoa has ruled on an accident caused by the sudden detachment of a boarding gangway fastened to the deck of a cruise ship to allow passengers to board.

This event (which unfortunately caused the death of a person who was on the gangway when it detached) allows us to make some considerations about the possible responsibility profiles of the various subjects involved in this case, which we schematically outline below:

  • the manufacturer of the gangway;
  • the Port Authority2, which bought the gangway and provided it to the concessionaire of the harbour station;
  • the concessionaire of the harbour station, which was delegated to the practical use of the gangway;
  • the master of the cruise ship to which the gangway was fastened.

For the sake of conciseness imposed on us herein, we will immediately examine the cause of the accident investigated by the Court of Genoa, so as to subsequently focus on the responsibility profiles of the subjects mentioned above.

In light of the technical investigations carried out, the Court of Genoa identified the cause of the sudden detachment of the gangway from the deck of the ship to be an "improper use" of the gangway.

In very practical terms, according to the Court, the gangway was not in itself "objectively dangerous" and – if used correctly (i.e. in compliance with the applicable safety regulations) – it would not have caused the event occurred. Excluding a "natural dangerousness of the asset", the cause of the accident was therefore attributed, as already mentioned, to the improper use of the gangway, or to a use characterized by a "macroscopic forcing of all existing safety conditions"3.

Having clarified the cause of the event, we will briefly examine the position – in point of potential responsibility – of the aforementioned entities involved in this case.

Firstly, with regard to the gangway manufacturer, the same – according to the Court – could theoretically have been held responsible for the event only in two cases: (i) if the objective and absolute dangerousness of the gangway had been ascertained (direct liability of the producer) or (ii) if the manufacturer had provided the goods knowing that the same was going to be used in a dangerous way. Since – in the opinion of the court – none of the two cases above was true, the manufacturer of the gangway was acquitted.

A similar issue – regarding possible responsibility profiles – was dealt with by the Court also with reference to the position of the Port Authority, that is to say the entity that had purchased the gangway and subsequently delivered it to the concessionaire of the harbour station, but never used the asset.

However, the Port Authority's position seems to differ from that of the manufacturer with respect to an aspect concerning the second of the cases taken into consideration above. Indeed, given the "physical and institutional" proximity with the concessionaire of the maritime station, according to the judge it could not be maintained that said Authority was unaware of the manner in which the gangway was actually used by its user. Consequently, still according to the Court, in the abstract, the Port Authority could be responsible for liability for negligence exactly in light of its aforesaid (alleged) awareness of the manner in which the asset was actually used.

On this point, the judge decided to refer the proceedings to the public prosecutor for procedural reasons, which are not to be commented herein. However, it is useful to highlight that – for the reasons mentioned above – the position of an Authority providing assets to a concessionaire could be different, in terms of liability in case of accident, from that of the manufacturer of said asset, given the aforementioned "proximity" between the Authority and the concessionaire. Indeed, because of this "proximity" the first of the aforementioned subjects could be deemed aware of the manner in which the second subject uses the asset and consequently this could justify an imputation of responsibility on the basis of the second criterion considered above (to provide an asset knowing that it will be used in a dangerous way).

As regards the position of the ship cruise master, according to the judge the latter could theoretically be held responsible for the occurrence of the event only if it were proved that the same – despite being aware of the danger represented by the improper use of the gangway – had anyway authorized the boarding/disembarking operations via that gangway, thus accepting the risk of the occurrence of the accident. That, obviously taking into consideration also the fact that the asset in question is ground equipment and as such outside the control of the master.

In this sense, in cases such as the one we are dealing with, we could (correctly) recognize the "legitimate expectations" of the master with respect to the equipment made available to the cruise ship by the harbour station (as well as with respect to the procedures for the management of said equipment, which – we repeat – are exclusively used for ground assistance).

In other words: according to the Court, the master could not be blamed for not taking further precautionary measures based on the use of a gangway provided by the harbour station of one of the first Mediterranean ports. In fact, it is hard to see how the master could have assumed that the use of that gangway involved a danger so serious as to impose the adoption of further safety devices. Since there is no actual obligation to adopt precautions, there can be no imputation of responsibility to the master for not taking further security measures.

From this point of view, we believe that this decision correctly limits the scope of the so-called "duty of care" of the master, which we had already dealt with – in relation to a different case – in a previous issue of our newsletter, which we refer to for an interesting comparison4.

Finally, we will examine the position of the concessionaire of the harbour station, which – as you will have gathered – was held responsible by the judge for the event occurred.

Indeed, the concessionaire was the user of the gangway and – according to the judge – it de facto consciously "used it in a dangerous way". The latter aside is clearly essential, given that the subject in question would not have been held liable if it had been unable to realize the absolute danger of the asset or in any case the danger deriving from the way in which such asset was – concretely – used.

In the present case, in light of the facts found during the proceedings, the Court held that the concessionaire of the harbour station had to be aware of the risk inherent in the manner in which it used the gangway. Nevertheless, the concessionaire failed to identify and adopt suitable measures to ensure the safe use of the gangway and hence this grounded the imputation of responsibility for the accident occurred.

The matter examined is particularly interesting in order to understand the possible "allocation" of responsibility profiles in case of accidents entailing – de facto – the involvement of several subjects. This hypothesis is anything but remote, as one can easily imagine when thinking of all the cases in which a harmful event occurs as a result of the use, or in any case during the use, of an asset in respect of which the behaviours, for example, of the manufacturer, supplier, operator and end user of said asset may be relevant. Therefore, the decision offers interesting insights for further meditations that, in our opinion, it is useful to keep in mind.

Footnotes 

1 See decision No. 5051/2017, First Division of the Criminal Court of Genoa, of 12.12.2017 (filed on 25.07.2018).

2 The facts in question are prior to the reform that introduced Port System Authorities but it goes without saying that the reasoning that follows on the point of responsibility does not change

3 Conditions referred, firstly, to the angle of inclination of the gangway with respect to the cruise ship, to the activation of alarm devices and to the necessary surveillance of the vehicle during the boarding of passengers.

4 See the Shipping and Transport Bulletin issue of August – September 2015 – "The position of a cruise ship's master in case of death of a passenger".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions