ARTICLE
23 September 2018

Conditional Clearance Of Trinity Mirror Acquisition

M
Matheson

Contributor

Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
The Irish competition regulator has this week cleared a media merger, subject to a behavioural remedy of ‘ring-fencing'.
Ireland Antitrust/Competition Law

Further Proof of Irish Trend of Behavioural Remedies and Long Length of Irish Process

The Irish competition regulator has this week cleared a media merger, subject to a behavioural remedy of 'ring-fencing'.  However, the parties cannot complete the deal for some time yet, as a separate Irish media plurality process may only commence now such that the total length of the Irish 'standstill obligation' could be more than 9 months.

In M/18/016 Trinity Mirror/Northern & Shell, acquirer Reach plc (formerly Trinity Mirror) undertook to 'ring-fence' the acquired shareholding in a joint venture with a competitor in order to secure competition clearance from the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission ("CCPC").  This behavioural remedy is intended to prevent access to competitively sensitive information in the context of post-merger management of the joint venture.  The CCPC has a long track record of accepting behavioural remedies and in particular 'ring-fencing' – making it stand apart from other EU competition regulators to some extent.  This year alone, a confidentiality remedy was accepted in two cases: (i) in M/18/031 Uniphar/SISK Healthcare, to address a concern that the acquirer healthcare wholesaler might use its new access to pricing data etc. to influence the target distributor's strategy in selling certain competing products, and (ii) in  M/18/009 BWG/4 Aces, to address a concern that the acquirer food retailer and wholesaler might have new access to sensitive pricing information from the target's relationship with a buyer group.

The CCPC's track record of 'ring-fencing' behavioural commitments can be traced back further in time also, for example to the 2009 Phase 2 case of M/09/13 Metro/Herald AM on which Matheson advised, where ring-fencing was required due to a concern that the Metro Herald freesheet newspaper should operate separately from its shareholders' broadsheet newspapers.

The CCPC's general approach to monitoring compliance with behavioural commitments is to require the acquirer to self-certify compliance to the CCPC annually.

While such behavioural remedies show a degree of pragmatism and flexibility by the CCPC, parties to a media merger raising issues in Ireland have to expect a long merger control and 'standstill period'.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More