The Classification Of Hedge Fund Indices As Financia lIndices

DE
Dillon Eustace

Contributor

Dillon Eustace is one of Ireland’s leading law firms focusing on financial services, banking and capital markets, corporate and M&A, litigation and dispute resolution, insurance, real estate and taxation. Headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, the firm’s international practice has seen it establish offices in Tokyo (2000), New York (2009) and the Cayman Islands (2012).
Pursuant to the new level three guidelines issued by the Committee of European Securities Regulators on 17th July, 2007, CESR has approved in principle the classification of hedge fund indices as financial indices for the purposes of the UCITS Directive subject to the satisfaction of certain criteria.
Ireland Finance and Banking

1. Introduction

Pursuant to the new level three guidelines issued by the Committee of European Securities Regulators ("CESR") on 17th July, 2007, CESR has approved in principle the classification of hedge fund indices as financial indices for the purposes of the UCITS Directive1 subject to the satisfaction of certain criteria.

2. Background

Pursuant to Article 19(1)(g) of the UCITS Directive, a UCITS fund may invest in liquid financial derivative instruments whose underlyings consists of one or more securities in which a UCITS fund can invest in directly as well as financial indices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates or currencies. Whilst CESR has previously issued previous guidelines in relation to the nature of "eligible assets" for the purposes of UCITS funds (the "original Level 3 guidelines")2, both the original Level 3 guidelines and the subsequent implementing directive (the "Implementing Directive")3 left open the question as to whether or not hedge fund indices could be properly classified as "financial indices" for the purposes of the UCITS Directive.

3. New Level Three Guidelines

The new level three guidelines for eligible hedge fund indices builds upon the criteria applicable to all financial indices, as set out in Article 9(1) of the Implementing Directive. However, the new level three guidelines provide that in order for hedge fund indices to be deemed eligible underlyings for financial derivatives, such indices must be subject to additional requirements regarding publication of their selection and construction methodologies as set out below:

 

The criteria applicable to all financial indices as set out in the Implementing Directive

The additional criteria set down by the new guidelines in respect of hedge funds

Sufficient diversification

  1. the Index must be composed in a way that price movements or trading activities regarding one component do not unduly influence the performance of the whole index;
  2. If the index is composed of eligible assets, it should be at least as diversified as set out under the diversification ratios of Article 22a(2) of the UCITS Directive;
  3. If the index is composed of noneligible assets, the index should be diversified in a way which is equivalent to that provided for in Article 22a(2) of the UCITS Directive.

By way of further clarification, the original Level 3 guidelines clarify that if the index is not at least as diversified as under Article 22(a), the fund must combine its underlying assets with the other assets of the fund to ensure that there is sufficient diversification unless the derivative on the index is used for risk-diversification purposes only in which case there would be no "look through" provided that the exposure of the UCITS to individual indices complies with the 5/10/40% ratios.

No additional requirements imposed.

Adequate benchmark

  1. The index must measure the performance of a representative group of underlyings in a relevant and appropriate way;
  2. The index must be revised or rebalanced periodically to ensure that it continues to reflect the markets to which it refers following criteria which are publicly available;
  3. The underlyings of the index must be sufficiently liquid, which allows users to replicate the index, if necessary

In addition:

  1. The methodology must provide for the selection and re-balancing of components on the basis of predetermined rules and objective criteria;
  2. The index must not be influenced by any payments made to the provider; and
  3. The methodology must ban any "backfilling practice", (that is to say, any retrospective changes to previously published index values)

Footnotes

1 Directive 85/611/EEC as amended by Directive 2001/107/EC and Directive 2001/108/EC.

2 "CESR's guidelines concerning eligible assets for investment by UCITS" (CESR/07-044, March 2007)

3 Directive 2007/16/EC adopted by the European Commission on 19th March 2007

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More