Ireland: Competition Litigation 2017

Last Updated: 26 September 2016
Article by Richard Ryan and Patrick Horan
Most Read Contributor in Ireland, October 2018

1 General

1.1 Please identify the scope of claims that may be brought in your jurisdiction for breach of competition law.

The Competition Act 2002 as amended (the "Competition Act") contains two main prohibitions:

  • Prohibition on anti-competitive arrangements between undertakings: section 4(1) of the Competition Act prohibits and renders void all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State, including those which:
    • fix prices;
    • limit or control production or markets;
    • share markets or sources of supply;
    • apply dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties; and
    • make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which by their nature or according to commercial usage have no connection with the subject of such contracts (e.g. tying).
  • Prohibition on abuse of dominance: Section 5 of the Competition Act prohibits the abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position in trade for any goods or services in the State or any part of the State. Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:
    • directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;
    • limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;
    • applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; and
    • making the conclusion of contracts subject to the acceptance by other parties of supplementary obligations which by their nature or according to commercial usage have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

These prohibitions are broadly similar to, and are modelled on, the prohibitions contained in Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU").

As regards civil proceedings, sections 14(1) and 14A(1) of the Competition Act provide that aggrieved persons and the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (the "CCPC") (or the Commission for Communications Regulation, hereafter "ComReg") respectively have a right of action against:

  • any undertaking which is/was a party to behaviour prohibited by sections 4 or 5 of the Competition Act or Article 101 or 102 TFEU; and
  • any director, manager or other officer of any such undertaking, or any person who purported to act in such capacity, who authorised or consented to such behaviour.

The range of remedies available is set out in Section 14 of the Competition Act and includes:

  • declarations;
  • injunctions;
  • damages, including exemplary damages (for aggrieved persons but not for the CCPC/ComReg);
  • orders requiring a dominant position to be discontinued; and
  • orders requiring the undertaking to adopt such measures for the purpose of it ceasing to be in a dominant position or securing an adjustment of that position including the sale of assets.

As regards criminal proceedings, sections 6 and 7 of the Competition Act make it an offence to breach section 4 or 5 of the Competition Act or Article 101 or 102 TFEU. The CCPC investigates alleged breaches of the Competition Act and can either itself bring a summary prosecution before the District Court or, in more serious cases, refer a case to the Director of Public Prosecutions (the "DPP") for prosecution on indictment. Section 8 of the Competition Act sets out the penalties for those found guilty of offences under sections 6 or 7 of the Competition Act.

The responses below are limited to a consideration of civil aspects of competition litigation.

1.2 What is the legal basis for bringing an action for breach of competition law?

Sections 14 and 14A of the Competition Act.

1.3 Is the legal basis for competition law claims derived from international, national or regional law?

National law: sections 14 and 14A of the Competition Act allow for the bringing of claims for breaches of sections 4 or 5 of the Competition Act and/or breaches of Articles 101 or 102 TFEU.

1.4 Are there specialist courts in your jurisdiction to which competition law cases are assigned?

There is no specialist competition court in Ireland. Civil competition cases are heard before the Circuit Court or the High Court. In general, the Circuit Court has jurisdiction to hear claims having a monetary value not exceeding €75,000. The High Court has original jurisdiction to hear virtually all matters irrespective of amount. However, a statutory instrument, Statutory Instrument 130/2005 The Rules of the Superior Courts (Competition Proceedings) 2005 ("SI 130/2005"), has amended the Rules of the Superior Courts by introducing a High Court Competition List and providing for procedures that apply to the Competition List. As a result, a judge of the High Court is designated to hear competition law cases and there are specific procedural rules which apply to cases entered into the High Court Competition List.

Proceedings that may be entered into the Competition List include:

  1. proceedings in exercise of a right of action conferred by the Competition Act on a person aggrieved in consequence of any behaviour prohibited by sections 4 or 5 of the Competition Act;
  2. proceedings in exercise of a right of action conferred by the Competition Act on the CCPC/ComReg in respect of any behaviour prohibited by sections 4 or 5 of the Competition Act or by Articles 101 or 102 TFEU;
  3. an appeal against the making of a declaration by the CCPC under section 4(3) of the Competition Act (such declarations are similar to European Commission block exemption regulations);
  4. an appeal against any merger control determination of the CCPC under Irish merger control rules to either block a transaction or clear it subject to conditions (other than in the case of media mergers);
  5. proceedings for judicial review of a decision of the CCPC;
  6. proceedings for an injunction to enforce compliance with the terms of a commitment or determination, or of an order made by the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise & Innovation under section 23(4) of the Competition Act (relating to media mergers);
  7. proceedings seeking the application of Articles 101 or 102 TFEU;
  8. proceedings for relief at common law in respect of a condition or covenant in any agreement alleged to be unreasonably in restraint of trade; and
  9. any other proceedings which concern the application of a provision of the Competition Act, of Regulation (EC) 1/2003 or of Articles 101, 102, 106, 107 or 108 TFEU.

The procedural rules for the Competition List are intended to expedite competition proceedings and provide for enhanced case management. Matters covered by those procedural rules include:

  • pre-trial procedures, including directions hearings, motions and applications, interrogatories and case management;
  • the use of pre-trial conferences and questionnaires;
  • court books;
  • the electronic filing and serving of documents;
  • exchange of documents and evidence; and
  • the appointment of experts to assist the court, particularly in relation to economic matters.

Competition issues may also be raised in cases not entered in the Competition List. In Ski Apparel v Revolution Workwear et al. [2013] IEHC 289, para. 61., for instance, which concerned a dispute involving an Irish distributor of Ski Apparel's products (clothing) and in which it was argued that a non-compete was anticompetitive, Laffoy J said "application of competition law, both at European and at national level, is a specialised discipline and, understandably, there is a special Competition Case List in the High Court. Notwithstanding that, competition law issues find their way into cases listed elsewhere in the High Court".

1.5 Who has standing to bring an action for breach of competition law and what are the available mechanisms for multiple claimants? For instance, is there a possibility of collective claims, class actions, actions by representative bodies or any other form of public interest litigation? If collective claims or class actions are permitted, are these permitted on an "optin" or "opt-out" basis?

Section 14(1) of the Competition Act provides that "any person who is aggrieved in consequence of any agreement, decision, concerted practice or abuse which is prohibited under section 4 or 5, or by Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, shall have a right of action under this subsection for relief".

"Aggrieved persons" include natural and legal persons. Section 14A (1) of the Competition Act provide a right of action to the CCPC (or ComReg) in respect of behaviour prohibited by sections 4 or 5 of the Competition Act or by Articles 101 or 102 TFEU. Follow-on actions are facilitated by a provision in the Competition (Amendment) Act 2012 whereby a finding by an Irish court of a breach of sections 4 or 5 of the Competition Act, or Articles 101 or 102 TFEU, will be regarded as res judicata (i.e. already adjudicated and unnecessary to be considered again) in any subsequent civil proceedings. Accordingly, a plaintiff in a follow-on action does not have to prove the infringement of competition law occurred and only has to prove causation, loss and the quantum of damages that they are entitled to if successful.

There is currently no procedure in Ireland for the taking of class actions seeking damages. In practice, parties involved in related actions may agree to one action proceeding as a "pathfinder case" and the other parties (including defendants) may agree to be bound by the outcome of the "pathfinder case". There have been calls for reform to facilitate the taking of collective/related actions in Ireland, including in a report by the Law Reform Commission published in 2005. Recent developments in the UK and at EU level, including the EU Recommendations on Collective Redress of 2013 and Directive 2014/104/EU on Antitrust Damages Actions, may provide further stimulus for reform in this area.

Representative bodies may bring representative actions on behalf of their members seeking injunctive or declaratory relief, but not damages.

1.6 What jurisdictional factors will determine whether a court is entitled to take on a competition law claim?

The jurisdiction of certain types of civil claims involving defendants who are domiciled in an EU Member State (apart from Denmark) is governed by Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) ("Brussels Regulation") (which replaced the previous version, Regulation (EU) 44/2001, with effect from 10 January 2015). In summary, in such cases, a defendant may be sued before an Irish court if it is domiciled in Ireland. Alternatively, a defendant may be sued in an Irish court if the anticompetitive behaviour, which is the subject of the complaint, is alleged to have occurred there. A defendant may also be sued in an Irish court if the relevant damage occurred, or will occur there.

If these criteria are met then it is likely that the Irish courts will have jurisdiction. In addition, where the parties have agreed that the courts of Ireland are to have jurisdiction to settle any disputes arising in connection with a particular legal relationship, those courts have jurisdiction, unless the agreement is null and void.

Ireland is a party to the Brussels Convention between EU Member States and Denmark and to the Lugano Convention between EU Member States and the members of EFTA, Switzerland, Iceland and Norway. Those Conventions apply similar rules which govern the jurisdiction of certain civil claims involving defendants in those countries.

Where the rules of the Brussels Regulation, the Brussels Convention and the Lugano Convention do not apply, Irish common law jurisdictional rules are applicable. In summary, Irish courts can have jurisdiction under common law rules in the following situations:

  • where the defendant has been duly served in Ireland;
  • where the parties agree to the jurisdiction of the Irish courts;
  • where a defendant submits to the jurisdiction of the Irish courts; or
  • where service outside of Ireland has been performed in accordance with Order 11 of the Rules of the Superior Courts.

Order 11 applies to cases where a defendant is not present in Ireland but the case is so closely connected to Ireland or with Irish law that there is ample justification for it being tried in Ireland. Under Order 11, it is necessary to apply for leave of the High Court before documents can be served outside the jurisdiction. This ensures that service on defendants outside the jurisdiction is limited to cases where the court is of the view that it has jurisdiction to consider the particular dispute. The burden of proof is on the applicant to establish that it is a proper case for service under Order 11.

Civil competition law claims can be brought in Ireland before the Circuit Court or the High Court. In general, the Circuit Court has jurisdiction to hear claims having a monetary value not exceeding €75,000. The High Court has original jurisdiction to hear virtually all matters irrespective of amount. However, if a claim is brought in the High Court and the award falls within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court (i.e. up to €75,000), the plaintiff may only be awarded costs applicable to an action before the Circuit Court.

1.7 Does your jurisdiction have a reputation for attracting claimants or, on the contrary, defendant applications to seize jurisdiction, and if so, why?

We are not aware of Ireland having a reputation for attracting claimant or defendant applications from other jurisdictions.

1.8 Is the judicial process adversarial or inquisitorial?

Ireland is a common law jurisdiction and has an adversarial judicial process.

2 Interim Remedies

2.1 Are interim remedies available in competition law cases?

The range of remedies available before Irish courts is set out in Sections 14 and 14A of the Competition Act. They include interim measures.

2.2 What interim remedies are available and under what conditions will a court grant them?

The courts may grant interim relief in respect of private antitrust litigation in certain circumstances. Sections 14(1) and 14A(1) of the Competition Act provide for the grant of interim injunctions, interlocutory injunctions and injunctions of definite or indefinite duration. Interim injunctions can be granted for very limited periods of time and may be granted on an ex parte basis while interlocutory injunctions can last until the full hearing of a case. Applicants are required to provide an undertaking to ensure that the defendant will be properly compensated should they lose their case.

The grant of injunctions is at the discretion of the court. An injunction may be granted by the courts where:

  • there is a fair question to be tried;
  • damages would not be an adequate remedy; and
  • the balance of convenience favours the award of the injunction.

The types of interim/interlocutory injunction available in Ireland include:

  • prohibitory injunctions restraining a person from carrying out an act;
  • mandatory injunctions to require a person to carry out an act; And
  • quia timet injunctions, which are granted to prevent an anticipated breach of legal rights.

It is more difficult to secure a mandatory injunction at an interlocutory stage than a prohibitory injunction. In Lingham v Health Service Executive [2005] IESC 89, [2006] 17 E.L.R. 137, which concerned an application for an interlocutory mandatory injunction, the Supreme Court stated that in such a case it is necessary for the applicant to show at least that he has a strong case and that he is likely to succeed at the hearing of the action.

3 Final Remedies

3.1 Please identify the final remedies which may be available and describe in each case the tests which a court will apply in deciding whether to grant such a remedy.

Section 14 of the Competition Act provides for the following possible remedies:

  • declarations;
  • injunctions;
  • damages, including exemplary damages (for aggrieved persons but not for the CCPC/ComReg);
  • orders requiring a dominant position to be discontinued; and
  • orders requiring the undertaking to adopt such measures for the purpose of it ceasing to be in a dominant position or securing an adjustment of that position including the sale of assets.

In addition, section 14B of the Competition Act, which was introduced by the Competition (Amendment) Act 2012, enables the CCPC or ComReg, following an investigation, to apply to the High Court to have commitments entered into by an undertaking made an order of court. A breach of those commitments would then constitute contempt of court by the undertaking. This provides the CCPC and ComReg with the option of bringing an investigation to a close by agreeing not to issue proceedings in consideration of the undertakings involved agreeing to do, or refrain from doing, such things as are specified in the commitments.

3.2 If damages are an available remedy, on what bases can a court determine the amount of the award? Are exemplary damages available? Are there any examples of damages being awarded by the courts in competition cases which are in the public domain? If so, please identify any notable examples and provide details of the amounts awarded.

There are two types of damages available in competition cases:

  • ordinary damages; and
  • exemplary damages.

The general principle underlying the award of ordinary damages is to compensate the injured party for the loss suffered as a result of the breach of competition law in question. As regards the intention of the defendant, in Donovan v ESB [1997] 3 IR 573 (SC), the Supreme Court held that "[the court] is not concerned with the motives or the intention of the party in default unless the question of exemplary damages arises".

The courts are expressly empowered to grant exemplary damages in competition cases under Section 14(5) of the Competition Act.

No specific statutory guidance has yet been provided on how such damages should be assessed. In Conway v INTO [1991] 2 IR 305, the Supreme Court, in the context of a breach of the constitutional right to education, explained that "[t]he object of awarding exemplary damages is to punish the wrongdoer for his outrageous conduct, to deter him and others from any such conduct in the future, and to mark the court's ... detestation and disapproval of that conduct". Therefore, contrary to the situation regarding an award of ordinary damages, the intention of the defendant is relevant when granting exemplary damages. To date, exemplary damages have rarely been awarded by Irish courts and the overall size of awards remains relatively small.

Section 14(4) of the Competition Act provides that, where an action is brought in the Circuit Court, any relief by way of damages, including exemplary damages, shall not, except by consent of the necessary parties in such form as may be provided for by rules of court, be in excess of the limit of the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court in an action founded on tort. This arises because the Circuit Court's maximum jurisdiction in terms of damages to be awarded is €75,000. The jurisdiction of the High Court is unlimited.

We are not aware of any Irish competition cases in the public domain where exemplary damages have been awarded.

3.3 Are fines imposed by competition authorities and/or any redress scheme already offered to those harmed by the infringement taken into account by the court when calculating the award?

The CCPC does not have the power to impose fines.

The calculation of damages is based on the loss suffered by a plaintiff. Therefore, an Irish court is unlikely to take into account fines imposed by other competition authorities in the calculation of ordinary damages. However, where the question of exemplary damages arises, such factors may be considered.

We are not aware of an Irish competition case in which a redress scheme was offered by the defendant to the plaintiff in respect of the infringement concerned in advance of determination of the proceedings. However, given that the general principle applicable to the calculation of damages is one of compensation for loss suffered, it is conceivable that a court could take into account if a redress scheme had been offered by the defendant and accepted by the plaintiff in determining the damages to be awarded in respect of the same matter.

To read this article in full, please click here.

Originally published by ICLG

This article contains a general summary of developments and is not a complete or definitive statement of the law. Specific legal advice should be obtained where appropriate.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Arthur Cox
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Arthur Cox
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions