Ireland: Delay & The Risk Of An Unfair Trial

Last Updated: 11 May 2015
Article by Nicholas G. Moore and Joanelle O’Cleirigh
Most Read Contributor in Ireland, October 2018

Can a defendant reasonably be expected to defend proceedings which relate to an event that occurred over thirty years ago and where many of the potential witnesses have since died? In a recent case, Cassidy v The Provincialate, the High Court thought there would be no real or serious risk of an unfair trial in such circumstances. The Court of Appeal, however, took a different view.

THE FACTS

The plaintiff claimed damages against the Religious Sisters of Charity for abuse she allegedly suffered between 1977 and 1980 at the hands of a man she claimed was employed by the Sisters. The alleged abuse was first reported to An Garda Síochána in December 2011 and the proceedings were instituted in May 2012. The Sisters sought to have the proceedings dismissed on the ground that their ability to defend the claim had been severely prejudiced. They were unable to find any record of ever having employed the alleged abuser and it seemed likely he was dead. Further, a number of other potential witnesses had also passed away. The High Court refused to dismiss the proceedings, taking the view that there was no risk of an unfair trial. The Sisters successfully appealed this finding to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal confirmed that while it was obliged to give due consideration to the decision of the High Court judge, it was nonetheless free to exercise its own discretion as to whether or not the claim should be dismissed. It assessed the claim by reference to the two well-established lines of jurisprudence on delay: (i) the Primor test; and (ii) the O'Domhnaill test. The Court was satisfied that, irrespective of which test was applied, the proceedings should be dismissed.

JURISPRUDENCE ON DELAY

Under the Primor test, which derives from the Supreme Court's decision in Primor plc v Stokes Kennedy Crowley (1996), the Court must consider (i) whether there has been inordinate delay on the part of the plaintiff in bringing the proceedings; (ii) if so, whether this delay can be excused; and (iii) whether the balance of justice favours the continuance or the dismissal of the proceedings. When assessing where the balance of justice lies, the Court may have regard to a number of factors, including whether the delay gives rise to a risk that it is not possible to have a fair trial.

Under the O'Domhnaill test, established by the Supreme Court in O'Domhnaill v Merrick (1984), proceedings may be dismissed even where there is no culpable delay on the part of the plaintiff. The question for the Court is whether, by reason of the passage of time, there is a real or substantial risk of an unfair trial or an unjust result.

The difference between the two tests lies in the degree of prejudice that must be established to justify a dismissal of the proceedings. A defendant who invokes Primor does not have to show that he faces a significant risk of an unfair trial. Once he can establish inordinate and inexcusable delay on the part of the plaintiff, he can urge the Court to dismiss the proceedings by reference to a whole range of factors, including relatively modest prejudice arising from the delay. Under O'Domhnaill, however, nothing short of establishing prejudice likely to lead to a real risk of an unfair trial or an unjust result will suffice.

A defendant may invoke both tests. If he fails under the Primor test, because the delay is excusable, he can seek the dismissal of the proceedings under O'Domhnaill on the grounds that there is a real risk of an unfair trial. However, in that event, the standard of proof will be higher than that imposed by the third leg of the Primor test.

APPLICATION OF THE PRIMOR TEST

There was no question but that the delay on the part of plaintiff in bringing the proceedings was inordinate. The High Court thought it was excusable, though this finding was reversed on appeal as lacking any evidential basis. As regards the balance of justice, the Court of Appeal stated that the likely death of the alleged abuser "visited the grossest imaginable prejudice" upon the Sisters who were not in a position to challenge or counter the allegations of abuse made by the plaintiff. The Court was satisfied that taken on its own, this factor was "of such prejudicial magnitude" that it tipped the balance of justice in favour of the Sisters. When one also factored in the death of a number of other witnesses, the issue was beyond doubt.

APPLICATION OF THE O'DOMHNAILL TEST

In addition to the likely death of the alleged abuser and the death of a number of other potential witnesses, the Court noted that:

  • many of the alleged acts of abuse took place at locations well removed from the Sisters' premises;
  • the plaintiff had never been in the care of the Sisters and they had no documents or records concerning her health or safety; and
  • the plaintiff did not tell anybody about the abuse until November 2009. The accuracy of her account of events could not be tested against any contemporaneous account of what was now alleged to have occurred.

The Sisters had located one former staff member who had some recollection of a man with the same name as the alleged abuser working as a general handyman in the nursing home at the relevant time. However, the Court said that this could not negate the risk of an unfair trial or an unjust result.

Accordingly, the Court was satisfied that under both the Primor and the O'Domhnaill tests, the proceedings should be dismissed.

DELAY IN PROSECUTING PROCEEDINGS

In another recent case, McLoughlin v Garvey, the Court of Appeal overturned a decision of the High Court striking out a claim of historic sex abuse. Though the alleged abuse in this case is said to have taken place over 28 years ago, the Court was concerned with a four year delay in the prosecution of, as distinct from the commencement of, the proceedings. While the Court accepted that the four year delay was inordinate, it found that it was excusable in circumstances where the plaintiff was preoccupied with caring for her son who was seriously ill, and the four year period of inactivity coincided with a significant deterioration in his condition. The Court had regard to a medical report submitted on behalf of the plaintiff which stated that it was "beyond the realm of possibility" that the plaintiff would have been able to partake, either physically or psychologically, in any court proceedings in that time.

The Court indicated that even if it had found that the delay was inexcusable, it would have found that the balance of justice favoured the continuance of the proceedings. The Court noted that even if the proceedings had been prosecuted with reasonable haste after their commencement in 2006, there would still have been a gap of close to 30 years between the occurrence of the alleged abuse and a trial of the action. Fading memories were always going to be a feature in the case - the four year period of inactivity after the commencement of the proceedings was not the reason for this. The defendant claimed that he was prejudiced by the death, during the four year period of inactivity, of one of his sisters and a cousin, both of whom could potentially have given evidence. However, the Court noted that there were other family members who could still give evidence.

COMMENTARY

The Courts are generally slow to make an order for dismissal. However, where a plaintiff has delayed significantly in bringing proceedings, the Courts will be cognisant of the likely prejudice a defendant may face, particularly where essential witnesses have died and memories have faded. A defendant facing historic allegations of wrongdoing should carefully review the claims being made to determine whether there are grounds to dismiss the proceedings. All potential witnesses should be identified and efforts should be made to locate such witnesses and these efforts should be fully documented. If essential witnesses are dead or cannot be located, the defendant should consider bringing an application to dismiss. To avoid any suggestion of acquiescence in the plaintiff's delay, an application to dismiss proceedings should be brought as soon as possible (read a related article here).

This article contains a general summary of developments and is not a complete or definitive statement of the law. Specific legal advice should be obtained where appropriate.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions