Ireland: English Court Requires ISPs To Block Websites Selling Counterfeit Goods

Last Updated: 17 November 2014
Article by Rob Corbet and Richard Willis
Most Read Contributor in Ireland, October 2018

In a landmark judgment, the English High Court has ordered the UK's main internet service providers (ISPs) to block access to websites selling counterfeit goods.

In recent years, the English courts (and indeed the Irish courts) have granted a series of orders requiring ISPs to block access to filesharing websites, such as The Pirate Bay, which infringed copyright. However, this is the first time in which a court in an EU member state has made a blocking order in an effort to combat trade mark infringement.


The Richemont Group, which owns several of the world's leading luxury brands, including Cartier, Mont Blanc and IWC, applied to the English High Court for orders requiring the UK's main ISPs to block access to six websites (referred to as "the Target Websites") which advertised and sold counterfeit Cartier, Mont Blanc or IWC goods.


Arnold J noted that despite the absence of an express power to grant injunctions under the UK Trade Marks Act (in contrast with UK copyright legislation), the courts have a general power to grant injunctions where the circumstances of a case so require. This power is not restricted to granting an injunction against the person actually infringing the right in question.

Arnold J stated that, as with copyright infringement cases, certain 'threshold conditions' must be met before a website blocking order can be granted in a trade mark infringement case:

  • the ISPs must be intermediaries within the meaning of the EU Directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights ("the Enforcement Directive");
  • either the users and/or the operators of the websites in question must be infringing the claimant's trade marks;
  • they must be using the services of the ISPs to do this; and
  • the ISPs must have actual knowledge of this.

Each of the above conditions was satisfied in this case.


The EU Enforcement Directive requires that measures adopted by member states to enforce intellectual property rights be proportionate. In finding that the blocking orders sought would be proportionate in the circumstances of the case, Arnold J had regard to the following:

  • Justification for interfering with the rights engaged: Arnold J weighed up the competing rights of the parties involved as follows: (i) Richemont had a legitimate interest in restricting the Target Websites from infringing its trade marks; (ii) the ISPs' freedom to carry on business would not be interfered with and nor would they be required to acquire new technology as they already have the requisite technology in place; (iii) the operators of the Target Websites had no rights which required protection as they appeared to be exclusively engaged in infringing commercial activity; and (iv) the users of the ISPs' services would not be adversely affected if the orders were properly targeted and had sufficient safeguards built into them (see below).
  • Availability of alternative measures: Arnold J was not satisfied that the alternative measures open to Richemont (e.g. domain name seizure, customs seizure and de-indexing from Google searches) would be as effective as blocking orders.
  • Efficacy: Arnold J referred to evidence which showed that the blocking of websites in copyright infringement cases had proved reasonably effective in reducing the use of those websites in the UK. He stated that there was no reason to believe that blocking would be materially less effective in reducing UK traffic to the Target Websites. In fact, it could possibly be more effective as the evidence suggested that consumers have little "brand loyalty" to the Target Websites, whereas websites like The Pirate Bay had quite a loyal user base.
  • Dissuasiveness: Arnold J was satisfied that the orders sought would have some dissuasive value since users would not only be blocked from accessing the Target Websites, but would also be informed of the reason for this. »» Cost: Arnold J noted that each of the ISPs had already invested in blocking technology in order to comply with blocking orders in copyright infringement and other cases. Further, the ISPs would not necessarily have to bear the costs of implementing the orders, but could pass them on to consumers in the form of higher subscription charges.
  • Impact on lawful users: Arnold J was satisfied that it would be possible to target the blocking in such a way so as not to adversely affect those who use the ISPs' services lawfully. SAFEGUARDS AGAINST ABUSE Mindful of the requirement in the EU Enforcement Directive that remedies in intellectual property infringement cases include safeguards to protect against abuse, Arnold J indicated that he would include provision for the following in his final orders: »» permission for (i) the ISPs, (ii) the Target Websites (who were not involved in the application), and (iii) subscribers to the ISPs' services to apply to court to discharge or vary the orders;
  • a statement to be included on the page displayed to users who attempt to access the blocked websites explaining that access to the website has been blocked by court order, identifying the party who obtained the order, and advising that affected users have the right to apply to court to vary or discharge the order; and
  • a 'sunset clause' to provide that the orders will cease to have effect at the end of a certain period unless (i) the ISPs consent to the orders being continued; or (ii) the Court orders that they should be continued.


The judgment of Arnold J will provide some comfort to brand owners who are seeking to protect their brand, reputation and the exclusivity of their goods. The case brought by Richemont was a test case and applications by other brand owners, both in the UK and across the EU, are likely to follow. Indeed, Richemont envisages further actions and has identified 239,000 potentially infringing websites, 46,000 of which have been confirmed as infringing.

An Irish court would be likely to consider the decision in Richemont as persuasive authority in terms of the protection of intellectual property. The decision mirrors a line of Irish High Court jurisprudence in cases such as EMI v UPC & Ors and EMI & Ors v UPC & Ors, where the Court displayed a willingness to protect intellectual property rights and grant orders requiring ISPs to block websites infringing copyright. It is likely that a similar rationale would apply in the case of online counterfeit cases based on trade mark infringement.

A recent report published by the EU Commission noted that in 2013 EU customs authorities seized a total of 35.9 million counterfeit articles, representing a market value of €768 million.

It is also worth noting that the recent adoption of EU Council Regulation No 608 of 2013, which allows for the destruction and detention of counterfeit goods by customs, means the remedies available to address online counterfeiting of goods have never been stronger.

This article contains a general summary of developments and is not a complete or definitive statement of the law. Specific legal advice should be obtained where appropriate.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions