Ireland: Delay And Prejudice

Last Updated: 30 June 2014
Article by John O'Riordan

Most Read Contributor in Ireland, July 2017

Introduction

The ability for a defendant to dismiss a case on the grounds of delay is well established by the courts. However, there are high standards that the courts adhere to when considering whether the balance of justice lies in favour of dismissing a case.

These standards were first laid down in Rainsford v Limerick Corporation and then approved and expanded upon in Primor PLC v Stokes Kennedy Crowley. The main questions which the court must address are:

  1. the party seeking dismissal must prove that the delay was both inordinate and inexcusable; and
  2. does the balance of justice lie in favour of proceeding with the case.

This article will focus solely on the issue of where the balance of justice lies.

The balance of justice

In assessing the balance of justice the courts have regard to a range of factors including:

  • constitutional principles of basic fairness and procedure;
  • whether the delay and the resulting prejudice make it unfair to the defendant to proceed with the case;
  • any delay on the part of the party seeking to dismiss the case;
  • does the delay give rise to the risk that it is not possible to have a fair trial;
  • and has the delay caused a risk of prejudice to the defendant.

Prejudice and recent judgments

The risk of prejudice causing an unfair trial is a key factor considered by the courts when they examine whether the balance of justice lies in favour of the dismissal of the case. If the delay has resulted in prejudice which would make it impossible to proceed with a fair trial, the courts have been more likely to find in favour of the defendant's application, provided that their conduct has not amounted to acquiescence i.e. – that they contributed to the delay.1

The question of prejudice was recently examined in the Supreme Court in the cases of Desmond v Doyle and Desmond v Times Newspapers Ltd., Rory Godson and John Burns. These were both defamation cases, where the High Court refused a motion to dismiss on the basis of delay and which were then appealed to the Supreme Court. The High Court and Supreme Court issued a combined judgement dealing with both cases.

The first case against Mr Tom Doyle related to a letter he had sent to the Moriarty Tribunal where he claimed that he, and not Mr Desmond, was responsible for the original idea behind the IFSC in Dublin.

The second case related to the publication of an article in the Sunday Times under the heading "Desmond was not the Man behind the IFSC idea, Tribunal told". The article reproduced the substance of Mr Doyle's letter.

There were three time periods of delay within these cases. The offending articles were published in February and March 1998. Proceedings were instituted pretty much immediately in both cases. From October 2000 to December 2005, there was no movement in the cases before a Notice of Intention to Proceed was served. A further eight months passed before discovery was sought in the Doyle proceedings and there was six months of inactivity which than followed until the discovery motions were issued. Therefore, there were three periods of delay; 5 years, 8 months and 6 months.

The plaintiff's counsels accepted the High Court's findings that there had been an inexcusable and inordinate delay in the commencement of proceedings, and that the only question to be considered by the Supreme Court on appeal was whether the balance of justice rested in favour of the defendant or the plaintiff.

It was stated in Primor Plc that generally where it is found that a case has been delayed to an extent which the court found to have been inordinate and inexcusable, 'the matter of prejudice seems to follow almost inexorably'. This statement was approved in O'Connor v John Player and Sons Ltd, with the court concluding that the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed even though there was no concrete evidence of a specific prejudice against the plaintiff as a result of the delay in prosecuting the claim.

In the Desmond case however, the Supreme Court after finding that the delay in prosecution was inordinate and inexcusable, examined the issue of prejudice and concluded that the defendants in the cases had failed to establish any basis to show that their ability to defend the action or advance a mitigation plea had been prejudiced by the delay. The Supreme Court found that any prejudice could only be "potential or marginal", and that this was not enough to ground a dismissal due to delay.

Prejudice considerations are different in cases which require documentary evidence and those which place a greater reliance on the evidence of witnesses. Where matters in a case are covered largely by documentary evidence, it will be more difficult for a defendant to establish that he has been prejudiced by the passage of time.2 While memories fade and witnesses can pass away, making evidence less reliable, documentary evidence does not become less reliable as time passes.

In his judgement, McKechnie J. refers to how the documentary evidence of Mr Doyle, who was looking to have the case dismissed, was entirely unsatisfactory. Mr Doyle claimed documents existed in 2001 which confirmed his assertion that he had come up with the idea for the IFSC. He could however provide no proof that these documents existed, and correspondence showed that Mr Doyle was not even sure if the documents existed.

The Supreme Court also found that he had made no effort to clarify the situation in relation to these documents between the High Court hearing and Supreme Court appeal. The Supreme Court found that due to Mr Doyle's lack of clarification on this matter, they would not go any further than the High Court had gone in finding that any prejudice caused by the delay was 'potential or marginal'.

Conclusion

Similarly to how the court will take the delay of both parties into account when they are applying to have a case dismissed for delay, the court in this case examined the actions of Mr Doyle as well as the plaintiff. Mr Doyle's behaviour and his failure to clarify the position on his purported documentary evidence was a factor in the court refusing to find that any significant prejudice arose in this case that could lead to a dismissal on the grounds of delay.

This, when examined with the other relevant factors the court looked at when deciding in whose favour the balance of justice lies, means that even after a court accepts that a delay is inordinate and inexcusable, it is still difficult for a court to accept that the balance of justice weighs in favour of the dismissal of a case without showing a real and substantial prejudice has resulted from this delay.

Footnotes

1 O'Connor v John Player and Sons Ltd [2004] 2 ILRM 321, 336.

2 Carroll Shipping Ltd. V Mathews Mulcahy & Sutherland Ltd. [1996] IEHC 46 at 11.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.