Ireland: Trustees Obligation On The Insolvency Of A Defined Benefit Pension Scheme

Last Updated: 7 February 2014
Article by Stephen O’Sullivan

A decision of the commercial court this week sheds light on the obligations of a trustee of the insolvency of a defined benefit (DB) pension scheme.

In Greene v. Coady (Unreported, High Court, Charleton J. 4/2/13) the plaintiffs were beneficiaries of a DB pension fund of Element Six Ltd. The defendants were trustees of the fund.

Element Six Limited (hereinafter the employer) had 359 employees in 2012 but the parent company operated in other jurisdictions including South Africa and owned the de Beers companies.

The scheme had 58 pensioners, 173 active members and 375 deferred members in 2011.

Clause 9 provided inter alia

No decision of the exercise of power by the trustees...shall be invalidated or questioned on the ground that the trustee... had a direct or personal interest in the result of any such decision or the exercise of any such power.

Under clause 14 of the trust deed, the employer had covenanted to pay such contributions as were payable under the rules of the trust deed to the trustees upon written demand. However, the employer could terminate liability with one month's notice in which case it was liable to pay any contributions or expenses which had become payable prior to the expiry of the notice and pay expenses in connection with the determination of the plan.

In 2008 the DB scheme had a funding deficit of €100 million. At that point the company made a funding proposal to last until 2020, which was to pay over €10 million per annum into the scheme (hereinafter the funding proposal payment). In late 2011 the employer indicated it would not be contributing the funding proposal payment for 2012 and offered to close the scheme and pay €37.1 million (€23.1 million into the DB scheme and €14 million into a new defined contribution scheme for active members). The employer said there was a risk that the site at Shannon would be closed with the loss of jobs if the offer was not accepted. At that point the trustees actuary advised on the possibility of a contribution demand notice. The advantage was a possible better return for the beneficiaries. The disadvantage was that the Shannon plant might be closed with the loss of jobs and also there was no guarantee that the liquidation of the employer would yield more than €37.1 million.

The trustees accountant's evidence at the time was that they could gain between €18m and 42.5m in liquidation as compared with the €37.1m offered and that sum might constitute a preferential debt on liquidation.

The trustees got advice from an actuary, accountant and solicitor and accepted the offer (hereinafter the acceptance) with the consequent liquidation of the fund. Three company nominee trustees voted in favour of the acceptance and three worker nominees voted against. The chairman exercised the casting vote in favour of the acceptance and the deal was done.

During the course of the trial it emerged the employer had authority to offer €40M to the trustees and the court was critical the employer was not forthcoming with this at the time but this did not determine the issues.

The plaintiff argued that the trustees were in breach of trust in failing to make a contribution demand notice in the sum of €129.2 million to make up the funding deficit.

The court found the trustees decision could only be condemned if it the trustees:-

  1. had acted dishonestly,
  2. did not act not in good faith,
  3. did not take into account all relevant considerations or excluded irrelevant considerations
  4. the decision was one that no reasonable body of trustees could have made.

The court found the trustees were not in breach of trust.

The court found the trustees were not in breach of duty in failing to refer the matter to the High Court for directions before acceptance since the option of applying to the court for directions was not so clearly the right thing to do that to no reasonable trustee would have failed to do so.

The plaintiff cited Robins v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2007 ECR 1053 and Hogan v. Minister for Social and Family Affairs Case C398/11 and argued that if a contribution demand notice had been served on the employer, the employer could then have been liquidated and if on liquidation the beneficiaries did not get 50% of their entitlement, they could have sued the state thus netting them to at least 50% of their entitlement. The court rejected this argument because the Hogan case had not been decided at the time the trustees made their decision.

The court found that the funding proposal of €10.725 million per year over 11 years did constitute a binding contract which could have been sued on by the trustees, when reneged on by the employer in January 2012, and that the total sum would have been a preferential debt in liquidation. Nevertheless, the court said that the trustees did not act unreasonably in making the acceptance taking into account the expert evidence as to what they might recover on liquidation. The trustees had a reasonable apprehension that assets would be moved from the employer company to other related companies.

As to the specific conflict of interest arguments the court found

  1. The plaintiff argued that four of the trustees had an interest in the employer continuing to stay in business in Shannon and were therefore conflicted. The court rejected this because one employee did not plan to stay in employment much longer and another employee was likely to move with the company abroad, if needed. These conflicts were unavoidable and were contemplated as required to be decided by the trustees from the inception of the trust. The trustees were entitled to take into account the benefit of continued employment to active members in Shannon and the benefit of the €14 million being contributed to a separate defined contribution scheme for the benefit of active members.
  2. The court found that a decision by the employer to pay a dividend of €19M to a shareholder company, of which two trustees were directors, played no role in their decision as trustees.

The court held that clause 9 of did provide trustees with a defence to the conflict of interest claim once the trustee did not act in breach of the general trust principles at a-d above .

The court found the decision of the trustees was not one which no reasonable body of trustees could have made and was within the range of what might be considered a reasonable response to a very difficult situation.

Comment

The court found that the trustees will be afforded due deference in their decision making, provided they don't act in breach of the principles a - d above.

The exemption from liability for trustees in the trust deed may be effective if the plaintiff tries to show a breach of trust outside of the parameters of a - d above.

The court afforded considerable scope to the range of issues the trustees could take into account in arriving at their decision. Where different beneficiaries have different interests, the trustees are entitled to look at the benefits that might flow to some beneficiaries but not others in judging the value of an offer made by the employer.

The court found, albeit obiter, that an agreed funding proposal by the employer can constitute a binding contract which can later be sued on by the trustees and which sum could constitute a preferential debt in liquidation.

The decision shows the value in the trustees seeking the advice of a competent actuary, accountant and solicitor in situations where the employer proposes to wind up the scheme and the value in maintaining a paper trail in relation to same.

The decision not to refer the matter to the High Court for directions was not impugned in this case, where the trustees were under clear time pressure from the employer. In other cases, where this time pressure does not exist, the safer course may be to refer the matter to the High Court for directions.

Given the value of this case, it may well be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Stephen O’Sullivan
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Arthur Cox
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Arthur Cox
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions