ARTICLE
17 September 2012

Extra Protection For Copyright Holders: European Union (Copyright And Related Rights) Regulations 2012

M
Matheson

Contributor

Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
The Minister for Research and Innovation, Sean Sherlock TD, recently announced the signing into law of the European Union (Copyright and Related Rights) Regulations 2012 (the "Regulations").
Ireland Intellectual Property

The Minister for Research and Innovation, Sean Sherlock TD, recently announced the signing into law of the European Union (Copyright and Related Rights) Regulations 2012 (the "Regulations").  The Regulations seek to fill the apparent gap in existing copyright legislation and in the protection afforded to copyright holders, highlighted by the court in the EMI1case in October 2010.


The Regulations

The Regulations amend the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 (the "Act") by explicitly providing for the right of a copyright owner to apply to the High Court for an injunction against an intermediary whose services are used by a third party to infringe their copyright or related right. 

They compel the Court to consider the rights of any person likely to be affected by virtue of the grant of an injunction and to give directions, such as requiring a person be notified, whenever it considers appropriate.


Comment

In the EMI case, Mr Justice Charleton decided that he was constrained by the Act in its current form and was unable to grant an injunction to prevent an infringement of copyrights against an ISP.  The Act had to be amended in order to fully transpose the EU Copyright Directive and the Enforcement Directive (the "Directives"). 

However, it is argued by businesses that that these amendments are not necessary and the Judge was misinformed during the case as regards Ireland's non-compliance with the Directives.

Despite the ongoing debate, the Regulations have been in effect since 29 February 2012 and it is believed that proceedings against businesses, such as ISPs and telecoms companies, could begin imminently.

There may also be further changes ahead as the Minister has launched the next stage of the Copyright Review Committee review of Ireland's copyright legislation and has implied that there are to be further updates to copyright legislation aimed at striking a balance between encouraging innovation and protecting creativity.  

Footnotes

1 EMI Records (Ireland) Ltd & Ors -v- UPC Communications Ireland Ltd [2010] IEHC 377 (11 October 2010)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More