India: India-Time Limits To Complete Arbitration Proceedings (Jayesh Pandya v Subhtex)

Last Updated: 27 September 2019
Article by Payel Chatterjee and Sahil Kanuga

Arbitration analysis: The Supreme Court of India in Jayesh Pandya v Subhtex India Limited has allowed an appeal against a 2008 order of the Bombay High Court, essentially relegating the parties back in time to the initiation of their dispute. In doing so, the Supreme Court has set aside more than ten years of contemporaneous litigation between the parties with respect to the same issue, namely the time limit to conclude their arbitration proceedings. Payel Chatterjee & Sahil Kanuga of the International Dispute Resolution and Investigations Practice at Nishith Desai Associates consider the decision.

Jayesh Pandya and Another v Subhtex India Limited and others Civil Appeal No 6300 of 2009

Jayesh Pandya and Another v Subhtex India Limited and others

What is the background to the issue of duration in Indian arbitration proceedings?

The Indian arbitration regime has faced difficulties due to the amount of time taken from the commencement of arbitral proceedings until the award is made. Prior to the amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (ACA 1996), it was not unheard of for an arbitration to run for even over a decade.

The courts have upheld prescribed time-lines in contractual agreements and rendered decisions beyond the time-period as bad law (Oman Refineries Limited v M/s Mantech Consultants Appeal No 702/ 2011 in Arbi-tration Petition No 477 of 2006). It is settled law that an arbitrator has no power to further extend the time be-yond that which is fixed in the agreement without the consent of the parties to the dispute. In the absence of an extension, the mandate of a tribunal automatically terminates after the expiry of the fixed time (NBCC Limited v JG Engineering Private Limited (2010) 2 SCC 385).

ACA 1996 does not specifically provide for the court to fix a time-limit for the conclusion of arbitration pro-ceedings, but courts could do so in the exercise of its inherent power on the application of either party. To address this situation and ensure arbitration continues to be an efficacious remedy, the Arbitration and Con-ciliation Amendment Act 2015 (the 2015 Amendments) inserted a new provision, s 29A, which provides a time-limit for the completion of arbitral proceedings. As per the 2015 Amendments, an award has to be made within a period of twelve months from the date the arbitral tribunal is appointed and such period may be ex-tended by a maximum period of six months by the parties. For any subsequent extension, an application to the court would need to made. With the latest round of amendments which have recently been notified, the Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2019 (the 2019 Amendment), have brought in further changes, extending the time-lines by incorporating a 12-month time frame post completion of the pleadings.

What was the background to these proceedings?

The present appeal arises from a dispute between parties with respect to time limit for rendering an award under an agreement dated 28 April 2000 (the Agreement). As per the provisions of the Agreement, the arbi-trator appointed was required to make an award within a period of four months from the date of service of copy of the Agreement. The arbitrator had the power to extend the period under the Agreement for making and publishing the award, with the consent of both parties. The sequence of events is provided below:

  • Respondent No 1 filed an application for the appointment of an arbitrator under ACA 1996, s 11 before the Bombay High Court (the Bombay HC)
  • The Bombay HC appointed Justice Tulzapurkar as a sole arbitrator by order dated 14 Novem-ber 2003. All issues on the existence, validity and effect of the arbitration agreement were kept open to be determined by the tribunal under ACA 1996, s 16
  • The above decision was challenged by way of a writ petition before the Division Bench of the Bombay HC by the Appellants. The writ petition was dismissed due to existence of adequate remedies under ACA 1996, s 16
  • The Division Bench ruling was challenged before the Supreme Court, which stayed the arbitra-tion proceedings by order dated 8 March 2004. During the pendency of the proceedings, the sole arbitrator passed away. By order dated 24 April 2007, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and appointed a new arbitrator, Justice Variava, to decide on the existence, validity and enforceability of the Agreement
  • The first preliminary meeting was held before the arbitrator on 4 May 2007. At the hearing, timelines were agreed to exchange pleadings, for discovery and inspection and statements of admission and denial. A preliminary meeting took place on 13 August 2007 where it emanated that time had been consumed in the exchange of claims, counterclaim and compilation of docu-ments A preliminary meeting took place on 27 August 2007 where the appellant argued that even as-suming the Agreement is genuine, the time limit for making an award had passed. The appel-lants refused to provide consent to extension of time The four-month period for passing an award expired on 4 September 2007 The tribunal on hearing the parties held that such objection should have been raised at an ear-lier stage and directed the respondent No 1 to obtain extension of time or to approach court for a clarification
  • No application was filed by the respondents and the jurisdiction of the tribunal expired on 4 September 2007. The arbitral tribunal scheduled the next meeting on 26 October 2007
  • The appellants filed an application stating that the tribunal had become functus officio with no power to proceed as the four-month period had expired. The application was rejected by the arbitrator by order dated 31 December 2007
  • The appellants challenged the order before the Bombay HC under ACA 1996, s 14 of seeking a declaration that the arbitrator had become de jure unable to perform his functions and mandate to act as arbitrator had terminated. The Bombay HC dismissed the application and held that appellant had waived their rights by participating in the proceedings and such an objection at this stage would frustrate the very purpose. This led to the current petition before the Supreme Court

What were the parties' submissions before the Supreme Court?

The respondents contended that the appellants, by their continued participation in the arbitration proceed-ings, had, by implied consent, waived their right to object. The respondents, relying on the Bombay HC deci-sion, reiterated that if such objections were considered by the arbitrator, it would defeat the object of having an arbitration agreement. The Bombay HC had rightly held that no interference was required from courts.

The appellants submitted that they categorically refused to consent to an extension of time and despite ob-jection and filing an application, the Arbitrator rejected it arbitrarily. The appellants relying on NBCC Limited v JG Engineering Private Limited argued that Bombay HC had failed to analyse the provisions of the Agree-ment and passed an unsustainable order.

What did the Supreme Court decide?

The Supreme Court interpreting the provisions of ACA 1996, ss 14 and 15 of held that mandate of an arbitra-tor terminated if they fail to act without undue delay. The facts established that during arbitral proceedings, the appellants had objected to the extension of time, thus in the absence of any consent, the mandate of the tribunal stood terminated automatically. The Supreme Court was of the view that the time limit prescribed un-der the Agreement was well within the scope of ACA 1996 and the arbitrator became functus officio after the four-month period. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Bombay HC decision.

While interpreting the object and purpose of ACA 1996, the Supreme Court agreed that ACA 1996 was en-acted for speedy resolution of disputes—but the terms and conditions agreed between the parties contractu-ally cannot be ignored. Failure to pay heed to the contractual provisions would frustrate the very intent of ACA 1996 ie to resolve disputes as per terms decided by the parties. The arbitration proceedings need to be conducted as per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties under the Agreement.

What are the practical implications?

In the given fact pattern, while the Supreme Court has expressly given parties the liberty to ventilate their grievance as admissible under law, it would be interesting to see what practical options are left for the parties at this belated stage.

An aspect that possibly requires some consideration and which will come up in due course will be how courts would interpret ACA 1996 in a situation where a contract provides a time limit less than the statutory period prescribed under the 2019 Amendment.

Be that as it may, at the time of entering into contracts, when parties are contemplating the idea of putting in a time limit within which arbitration proceedings are to be concluded, parties would be well advised to keep in mind that (i) extremely aggressive timelines may actually be counterproductive, especially in situations where one is dealing with a recalcitrant respondent—and (ii) the law now provides for a time limit within which pro-ceedings are required to be concluded.

This article was originally published in Lexis®PSL Arbitration on 16th September 2019

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions