India: Trademark And Goodwill Valuation: MP High Court Examining The Option To Auction

Last Updated: 5 August 2009

Valuation of Intellectual Property assets plays an important role in licensing, assignment, mergers, acquisitions and all related transactions. Examining the thin line between a Trademark and its Goodwill and whether the viability of its auction in light of the previous orders rendered, is the decision in the matter of Kale Khan Mohd. Hanif v. Mohd. Iqbal [2009(40) PTC 210(M.P.)(DB)]. The issue deliberated upon had already undergone a series of litigation proceedings at various rungs of the judicial line up and the interpretation of the previous decrees and judgments was also examined here.

The Preceding Pronouncements:

Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh High Courts a Writ Petition had been filed under Art 227 of the Constitution of India whereby the propriety of an order passed by the Ld. Additional District Judge was questioned. The order in question had rejected the report of the Commissioner for valuation of a Trademark in response to which a writ of certiorari for quashing the same had been prayed. Pursuant to these proceedings, a writ appeal was invoked before the Division Bench of the MP High Court to examine the defensibility and legal tenability of the Single Judge's order.

The documents brought on record in the course of litigation, revealed that the parties to the petition Mohd. Iqbal (the respondent) and Kale Khan Mohd. Hanif were in a partnership for the manufacture of Bidis. It was averred that the partnership firm underwent dissolution in January 1986, in pursuance of a civil action in regard to which a preliminary decree of dissolution had been passed by the ADJ in 1996, which retrospectively granted a preliminary decree of deed of dissolution. A Chartered Accountant had also been appointed by the Court to settle accounts of the dissolved firm. In his report, the CA expressed that valuation of the trademark was a technical matter and that a trade mark valuer must be referred for the matter. Subsequently, upon application, the trial Court appointed a firm to value the trademark. The goodwill of the partnership firm had been evaluated by the Commissioner at Rs. 1,80,56,859/- while the trademark had been valued by the appointed agency to be worth Rs. 20,77,589/-. In this pursuance, objections were raised as to the trademark valuation to be excluded from the report. The Trial Court on this objection held that the valuation of the goodwill included trademark valuation and accordingly rejected the report valuing the trademark. It is this order that was challenged via a writ petition before the Ld. Single Judge of the MP High Court. The legal proprietary of the Judge's order was also questioned.

However, the single Judge at the High Court held that the goodwill and trademark were not evincible as deciphered from Sections 38 and 39 of the Trade Marks Act 1999.The Court ruled that the trial Judge was exact in appointing another expert Commissioner to undertake the valuation of the trademark and that the rejection of the same by the trial Judge was incorrect. He also opined that the valuation made was on paper and that the same could be ascertained by putting them on auction. Taking in view a holistic consideration of various factors, the Single Judge directed that the trial Judge direct the Commissioner to proceed in accordance with the preliminary decree as interpreted in the order to the writ petition.

Deliberation Before The Division Bench:

Before the Division Bench, the Counsel for Mohd. Hanif asserted that the previous litigations and the judgments pronounced therein should be considered, in as much as they throw light on the situation, as also confirm the preliminary decree, which according to them, had been gravely misinterpreted by the Single Judge. It was asserted that the decree of the Single Judge could not be upheld in as much as it amended and enlarged the scope of the decree. It was also propounded that the trial court would have been aware that the trademark had no independent existence from the goodwill and therefore no mention of the trademark valuation as a separate property/asset had been made. It was asserted that goodwill was dependent on multifarious factors and that the Single Judge had committed illegality by travelling beyond the scope of the writ petition by issuing a direction for the auction of the trademark and goodwill. It was stressed that the writ merely looked if the trademark and goodwill were concurrent and one or not.

The counsel for Mohd. Iqbal responded stating that the counsels for Md. Hanif were not entitled to contend that the trademark and goodwill were one and the same, inasmuch as the commissioner's report had been rejected on the ground that valuation of the trademark had not been made separately and that the order had been acceded to by Mohd. Hanif. The contention made by Hanif regarding trademark and goodwill being one and the same was also rebutted stating that the two were different concepts, as elucidated under the Trade Marks Act. Further they stated that the assignment of the trademark could take place with or without goodwill, in view of which no fault with the order of the Single Judge could be found.

The Division Bench, taking account of these submissions, found that the preliminary decree revealed that although no mention of the trade mark was there, although it did refer to the assets of the firm. The provisions of the Trade Marks Act were also looked at alongside the plethora of cited judgments to examine if any distinction between "goodwill" and "trademark" was existent. The Court stated that there was no doubt regarding the existence of a marked distinction in view of the enunciated law and precedents, as also in view of the assignability of a trademark. The assertion that the Trial Judge had moved beyond the scope of the writ jurisdiction, was also noted, as also the averments regarding inconsistency between the judgment and decree. Noting the contents of the decree and judgment, the Division bench however opined that no inconsistency existed, in as much as the direction to auction the goodwill was consistent with the intent in the decree. Stating so, the writ appeal was pronounced dismissed without any order as to costs.

© Lex Orbis 2009

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions