India: Public Interest Litigation In India – Pitfalls Facing Multinationals*

Last Updated: 24 June 2009
Article by Sumeet Kachwaha

My talk focuses on how the Judiciary itself can become a fraught circumstance. Not an underdeveloped, intimidated, cowed down or controlled judiciary but a free, robust, independent and bold judiciary. For, in India the opposite is true.

Indian judiciary is perhaps the most empowered and activist judiciary in the world. It can strike down legislation. It can strike down governmental policies and indeed it is not unknown for it to mandate new policies or prescribe policies through judge made law. In a public address in 1998, Lord Woolf, the then Master of Rolls (England) expressed his "gasping admiration" for the work done in the immediate past by the Indian higher courts and added that attempts by the British judiciary to exercise control over the government "are nothing compared to the kind of work, the Courts in India have done."

This large jurisdiction of the court got even further expanded under a court developed (or self-created) jurisdiction which the courts have created for themselves which goes by the name of Public Interest Litigation (PIL). In exercise of PIL the superior courts of India entertain petitions from any activist, organization or individual espousing any public cause and in such cases courts do not insist on locus standi or procedural compliances and do not consider it to be an adversarial litigation (which is otherwise the norm in India).

To give you an idea as to how PIL has expanded and how the courts are getting more and more into areas which may rightfully belong to the executive or legislature let me refer to an article a journalist wrote. He compiled a list of issues and matters into which the High Court of Delhi had recently taken cognizance of. His list reads: Age and other criteria for nursery school admissions, unauthorised schools, number of free seats in schools, supply of drinking water in schools, number of free beds in hospitals on public land, use and misuse of ambulances, requirements for establishing a world class burns ward in a hospital, the kind of air Delhites breath, begging in public, the use of sub-ways, the state of buses, the legality of constructions in Delhi, the size of speed-breakers on Delhi roads, auto-rickshaw over-charging, growing frequency of road accidents and enhancing of road fines.

Hence PIL has become a catch all jurisdiction and is often accused of transgressing into areas which the judiciary is not meant to get into or not equipped to get into. Moreover, one of the major problems of PIL is that the Courts have not adopted a uniform and consistent approach in such matters. There are no clear guidelines as to when the court would or would not interfere and the extent of intervention. Indeed it can turn on the personal whims and fancies of the Judge and this is what makes it Fraught.

Let me expand this through two cases relevant to construction lawyers.

The Sethu Samudram Project:

This case has rather interesting facts (and can well be a fit case for study by students of jurisprudence). India is separated by a narrow sea from its neighbour, Sri Lanka but the passage between the two countries is not navigable. It has a draft of only 3 meters which means that no commercial sea trade can happen between the East and West coast of India. Vessels have to circumvent to all the way around Sri Lanka thereby adding about 36 hours to the journey time. This affects the entire connectivity of the country and even international trade. A project to open up a shipping route through dredging a canal in the Palk Strait has been under contemplation for decades and finally took off in the year 2005. (So we believed except for what came to follow). The project in short was to dredge or dig up and create two shipping channels totaling about 160 k.m. and increase the draft of the canal to about 11 meters. The project cost was 560 million dollars. After exploring several alternatives the Indian Government decided to go ahead with a route which would be feasible and at the same time would not impact a marine biological park in the area. As expected, one or two waves of PILs were immediately filed, chiefly around the issue of environmental compliances or threats and all of them were dismissed both at the High Court and Supreme Court level. When the project was more than half way through, a PIL was filed in the Supreme Court. This time the challenge was that the passage would cut across a mythological bridge which the God king Ram built to help his army cross from India to Sri Lanka. This is how it is described in the holy book Ramayan which is like a religious text in India and Ram is one of the main Gods worshipped by millions in India. Thus a new dimension came to be added viz sentiments of the people who believe in the literal version of Ramayan. It was contended before the Supreme Court that the religious sentiments of people would be hurt. The Supreme Court by a non-speaking interim order stopped all dredging works. This was some what unfortunate. The project had been cleared by all political parties of India (at various stages when they were in power) and had gone through innumerable expert committees who had presumably explored all options. Besides the Petitioner had approached the Court after undue delay when the project was more than 50% complete. The court rejected all these objections and stopped the work as mentioned above. The court then took upon itself the onus of setting up expert committees and working out alternative routes. Very interestingly the Government seemed happy with this arrangement for once the issue becomes socially explosive and politically costly, it is a good to let the Court bell the cat. So at some point of time the Government left it to the Court to do what it wanted without in any way supporting its own project. Now it is for the Court to choose between faith and environment or indeed between status quo and progress. In July 2008 arguments were heard and as on date the judgment is awaited. Thus, the project has already got delayed by over one year. From the developers point of view it is a total disaster for all cost calculations would gone haywire. Fortunately no private party was involved and the dredging work was being carried out primarily through a public sector undertaking - so it is only tax payers money which is suffering. Otherwise it could have been very embarrassing for the country - specially if foreign companies were involved.

The Cogentrix case

India due to its socialist political ways (which are thankfully mostly in the past) suffers from very poor infrastructure. Amongst others, the power sector which was a State monopoly had almost broken down. In these circumstances in the early 1990's privatisation was embarked upon and in the process the State Government of Karnataka invited a US power company, Cogentrix to set up a 1000 MW power project. Unfortunately no public tendering took place. Instead the Chief Minister along with a team of senior bureaucrats visited Europe and USA, took presentations from 14 power companies and through this process selected Cogentrix to enter into an MOU for the project. In order to attract the company and in order to make the Project bankable, the Government of India gave a sovereign guarantee in support of State obligations under the contracts with Cogentrix. The Power Purchase Agreement had a "Take or Pay" clause. The project was cleared by both the Central and the State Governments. It went through all the statutory authorities and was a rather prestigious over half a billion dollar project. When the project was on track for achieving closing, an individual describing himself as a public spirited citizen wishing to espouse public interest, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Karnataka stating that there were very suspicious circumstances surrounding the contract. He contented that Cogentrix was relatively an unknown company even in the USA and did not have the financial wherewithal or experience or expertise to take on such a large project. He said that the project had been window dressed in order to attract the Government of India. Cogentrix had a history of setting up and selling projects i.e. it is only going to trade in the project and make a huge profit for itself etc. etc. The arguments appealed to the High Court Judges and even though it could have been argued that this is a pure matter of commercial decision for the executive to take, the court felt that the circumstances surrounding the contract were so suspicious that it warranted a criminal investigation to establish if there was bribery or corruption. The High Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation to depute a very senior officer to investigate the matter and to complete the investigation within one year. Further it directed that monthly progress reports be filed in the High Court in a sealed cover.

Cogentrix took the matter up in appeal to the Supreme Court which came to the opposite conclusion. It held that the High Court had proceeded on surmises and conjectures and "flights of fancy" that some crime might have taken place some where by some body. The court said that this is nothing but like a blind shot fire in the dark. It went on to say the High Court had approached the matter with a jaundiced eye. Very strong words indeed. The Supreme Court no doubt tried to undo the damage done by the High Court but almost two years had lapsed between the High Court and the Supreme Court Judgment and about 7 or 8 years had lapsed since the project was initiated. All this discouraged Cogentrix so much that it decided to walk out of the project and all the time and energy which had gone into attracting, examining and sanctioning the project came to naught.


While PIL has come in for some criticism as it is seen as a transgression of powers by the judiciary into areas not meant for it, it is here to stay and there is general acceptance that we do need an interventionist and activist judiciary and even if in the process there is judicial overreach, it is justified due to legislative and executive underreach. The problem is that it brings in its wake judicial excesses and uncertainty or even if the defendant were to prevail there would be sheer delay which the project may not be able to tolerate and therefore this becomes a fraught circumstance.

Recommendations for avoiding failure / cost and time overruns.

If I have to give one single recommendation, I would say that the project developer must keep its ear to the ground. You have to keep the people in mind. You have to be in tune with the local sensitivities. It is of course very good to look for "single window clearance" and to have the green signal from the top executives or politicians but in a multilayered democracy all this gets diluted. Everything is not legal compliances or having a water tight contract signed off.

Large projects tend to attract attention and larger the project the greater the attention it will attract. Large projects also are likely to impact vast sections of the people and in such situation, public sentiments and public interest come into play. In a multilayered democracy problems can crop up at any time and well into the contract execution stage. In such situation, if the project if subjected to judicial scrutiny, it must be able to stand on its own feet. There should be no issues of transparency; of environmental threat or huge human cost.

Before parting I may stress that this is not a bleak scenario. In fact a strong and independent judiciary is also the best comfort a foreign developer can have while entering into unknown shores.

The comfort one can draw from the Indian judiciary is that though it may be inquisitive and interventionist, it is not unfair. There is no anti-foreigner bias and if the project is good justice will prevail.

* Transcript of talk delivered at the International Bar Association Annual Conference at Buenos Aires in October 2008.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions