India: Designs And Artistic Works: Microfibres’ Appeal Falls Through

Last Updated: 9 June 2009

The line between provisions of the Copyright Act and Design Law although independent of each other, find parties approaching the Court to debate these provisions increasingly. This is pertinently true of the definition of "artistic works" as in S. 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the exclusión of works subject to copyright from the ambit of Design law. Addressing an appeal against the Ld. Single judge of the High Court of Delhi in the case of Microfibres Inc. v. Girdhar & Co. & Anr. (Suit No. 1480/2002), the Double Bench of the Delhi High Court dwelled on the question of interpretation of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act read with Section 2(d) of the Designs Act and Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act and their interplay with each other. Noticing that issues of commonality also existed with two other appeals, viz. Mattel Inc & Ors v. Jayant Aggarwalla & Ors. FAO(OS) NO. 447/2008 and Dart Industries Inc. & Anr v. Techno Plast & Ors. FAO(OS) NO. 326/2007 the division bench has allowed the parties to make submissions on common legal principles arising in these appeals.

Microfibres and Girdhar are engaged in the business of upholstery fabrics. The impugned judgment held that the designs of Girdhar were a substantial reproduction of the Microfibres artistic works. Microfibres were however Aggrieved by the judge's decision that the designs in question were capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and in the event of were not capable of being protected under the Copyright Act, 1957. Microfibres had not sought registration under the Designs Act.

Microfibres contended that their works qualified as original artistic works within S.2(c) and that there was no distinction between purely artistic works and others and hence they could claim exclusive rights to the same under Section 14(c) of the Copyright Act. Further, they went on to aver that the Designs Act, 2000 specifically excluded "artistic works" as defined by Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 from the definition of 'Design'. They went on to state that the original underlying paintings made by Microfibres which were applied to the textiles with certain modifications fell within the meaning of 'original artistic works'. They further stated that the work of art in question had an independent existence in itself. It was also contended that the exclusion of an 'artistic work' as defined in section 2(c) of the Copyright Act from the definition of 'design' under Section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 was not restricted to the exclusion of the nature of artistic works like painting of M.F. Hussain, but artistic works of varied nature. They alleged that Girdhar & Co. had indulged in unfair trade practice which was an aspect that had been completely ignored in the impugned judgment.

In addendum, Mattel Inc. and Dart Inc. highlighted that the process involved in manufacture of a final product was the preparation of drawing, followed by the production of the mould and then the final product. They stated that preparation of the drawing and production of the mould were copyright protectable u/s 2(c) along with S. 14(c) (i) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and that the loss of copyright upon registration of design was restricted to the third stage whereby it was applied to the final product.

Girdhar & Co. contended that the distinction between a 'design' and an 'artistic work' lay in the applicability of the former to an article and the intention to be used as model of patterns to be multiplied by an industrial process. The patterns and designs of Microfibres were used industrially and commercially in India and abroad. Further, it was stated that a design necessarily required something in the nature of a drawing or tracing and such a drawing or tracing did not qualify protection under copyrights. They also stated that Microfibres final product had been sold in India & overseas in numbers exceeding fifty. They also stated that to circumvent the standing in S. 15(2) of the Copyright Act, a new plea of original work being modified to be applied to the final product had been placed forth the bench which was never raised in their original plea.

Giridhar & Co.'s co-respondents also argued that the artistic copyright in the fabric designs was affected by the definition of 'design' in the new Designs Act, 2000. Further, it was stated that the intention with which the artistic work was made was to be taken into consideration and to view if the artistic work was always intended to be an industrial product for the production of a commercially produced fabric and marketed commercially. Further, they averred that S.15 (2) of the Copyright Act places a bar on any copyright protection available to any artistic work been applied to by an industrial process more than 50 times. They also noticed a similar design to that of microfiber had been registered under the U.K. Designs Act, 1949 in UK.

Techno Plast and its co-respondents, parties to (FAO (OS) No.326/2007) contended that it was necessary to determine the purpose for which the artistic work was created so as to determine which enactment applies. They also propounded that the work which was created for industrial application and its segregation into two or three stages was not feasible under the Copyright or the Designs Act. With respect to Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, it was stated that once the work as applied to final product as a design, the provision does not provide any copyright protection to the intermediate stages. Jayant Aggarwalla, respondents in (FAO(OS) No.447/2008) in addition stated that the protection seeked for different stages of production would render the Designs Act otiose. They also stated that the appellants in the matter claimed a larger monopoly by the design proponent in spite of commercial production, which defeated the intent of the Designs Act. They substantiated their stand by stating that every design was traceable to a mould or a drawing and the only test which needed to be applied dealt with the intent of creating the mould. They also added that the article needed to be seen as a whole and the appeal of the article, subject matter of the design protection formed part of the article itself and hence could not be protected as separate work of art.

In retort, the appellants to the matter examined the election theory, (the creator of an artistic work loses his copyright upon application of the work to an article) and the intention theory stating them to be flawed. They also stated that the copyright in the design, applied to an article is extinguished and not the copyright in the artistic work itself under S.15 (2).

Taking note of the arguments advanced the Court went on to address the issues that were framed. Examining the question of whether the artistic work fell under the purview of design copyright or artistic copyright, Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act defines "artistic work" to mean a painting, sculpture, a drawing (including a diagram, map, chart or plan), and engraving or photograph, whether or not any such work possesses artistic quality. This definition was opined to possess a wide connotation and even extend to artistic works without any visual appeal. The Bench stated that under S.14(c), the holder of a Copyright had an exclusive right of in an original artistic work to reproduce the work in any material form. It was observed that the reproduction of the original artistic work was conducted by employing an industrial process, which resulted in a finished article which possessed appeal to the eye as adjudged solely by the eye then the industrial process constitutes a "design", within the purview of the Designs Act. The Court also found that a design qualifies to be termed as an artistic work within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, provided that it is original. Under the Designs Act, copyright was said to mean the exclusive right to apply the design to any article in any class in which the design is registered. Addressing the difference between a design and an artistic work, the Con Planck Ltd. case 1923 KB 804, was referred wherein it was held that the fundamental distinction between a design and a simple artistic work lay in the applicability of the former to some other article. It was concluded that the original artistic work fell under original artistic work but its derivatives fell under the purview of Designs.

The Bench also pondered upon the question of whether the intention of the creation of the work determined the regime of Intellectual Property Rights and stated that doing so was incorrect. Observing that the artist's intent at the time of creation of the artistic work may be indecipherable, the intention at the time of the creation of the artistic work was said not plausible to determine the nature of protection available to the artistic work. The Bench went on to conclude that the design, which was a slight variant of the original artistic work, was industrially applied to an article to produce a product, can only claim registration under the Designs Act and not under the Copyrights Act, irrespective of the intention of the creator.

Examining the vehement argument dealing with the different stages of production being individually protectable under Intellectual Property Rights, the same was said to be legally not sustainable because the same would enlarge the monopoly in industrial design to the longer period available under the Copyright Act. The legislative intent behind the Copyrights Act & Designs Act was opined to revolve around the grant of a higher protection to pure original artistic works and any activity which is commercial in nature was to be granted a lesser period of protection. Microfibres' contention of splitting the stages of production was said to not only afford design protection in case of registered works but also in addition, the copyright protection to the works which were industrially produced. Such an interpretation was said to make the legislation otiose owing to the traceability of the origin of every registered design. The judgment in the Interlego case (1988) RPC 343 was also referred which supports that the intermediary process of creation of a design from an original artistic work cannot be afforded protection under the Copyright Act if been applied more than 50 times industrially to produce an article. Therefore it was decided that intermediate stages of production are not copyrightable.

The Court also took note of the question of whether Section 15 of the Copyright Act excluded from the ambit of Copyright protection either the original "artistic work" upon which the design is based or the design which by itself is an artistic work. The original paintings/artistic works which may be used to industrially produce the designed article were said to continue to fall within the meaning of the artistic work defined under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 and be entitled to the full period of copyright protection which was also evident from S. 2(d) of the Designs Act. The original painting was said to be entitled to copyright protection, but the design derived therefrom for the purposes of industrial production were said to be covered by the limitations placed in Section 15 of the Copyright Act and the same be protected if it was registered as a Design under the Designs Act. The Bench reiterated that any other interpretation would render the registration under the Designs Act as meaningless and the protection under the Designs Act cannot be granted protection under the Copyright Act, which is evident from Section 15 of the Act. Designs derived from original artistic works such as moulds, used for industrial application of the design on the articles would not qualify for protection as artistic works under the Copyright Act except in accordance with Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act.

In this light, the Bench pronounced that no merit existed in the facts & arguments raised in the appeal and hence the appeal was dismissed.

© Lex Orbis 2009

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions