India: Delhi High Court Adjudicates On Forum Non-Convenience: GSK´s Plaint Returned

Last Updated: 16 April 2009

The doctrine of "Forum non-convenience" is to render litigants an appropriate jurisdiction to file a suit, without causing undue hardship to any party. The dicta being well established in law was revisited in the case of Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. v. Heinz India (P) Ltd. 2009 (39) PTC 498 (Del)

Two suits were filed against M/s Heinz India (P) Ltd by Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Health Care Limited (GSK) as a sole plaintiff in the first and joining as a co-plaintiff along with Horlicks Limited, United Kingdom in the Other. Both suits dealt with allegedly disparaging advertisements by Heinz, manufacturers of drink/milk mix "Complan". The first suit filed by GSK alone dealt with print advertisements and while the second dealt with moving/video advertisements.

Heinz had entered appearance on 12th December, 2008 when the first suit was listed for the first time and were on caveat in the second. Heinz submitted that the High Court of Delhi should not entertain the present suits on the principle of 'forum non-convenience' and that the parties had been extensively heard on the aspect as also the grant of ad interim injunction. The proceedings and outcome of the suits before the Calcutta, Mumbai and Madras High Courts were also alluded.

The suits were then filed at the Delhi High Court on the question of disparaging advertisements and after Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. It was alleged that disparaging remarks by using the words "cheap/cheaper" were made in reference to the product of GSK in the print advertisement and therefore advertising/ representing that the product of GSK is inferior in quality or sub-standard. Allegation of false claims with regard to the ingredients, nutritional value or number of nutrients in the two products in comparison was also made.

With reference to the moving advertisement launched by Heinz in which the two products were displayed, with two mothers and their children in a shop discussing the nutritional value of the ingredients in the two products. Horlicks was described as "Sasta", while Complan was stated to be a superior product with better quality and more.

The advertisements in the two suits before the Calcutta and Madras High Courts were opined by the Delhi High Court to be distinct and separate from the advertisements, which are a subject matter of the present suit and the one filed at Bombay High Court. The advertisements which were subject matter of the suit pending before the Calcutta and Madras High Court were said to bear no direct relation with the advertisements in the present suits since they were on the question of disparaging advertisements between parties to the present suit.

On the question of the High Court of Delhi being "forum non-convenience", the Court observing that
Sections 15-21A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 dealt with territorial jurisdiction, stated that they were only with Section 20 of the Code in addressing the question of whether the Court should reject the
plaints on the ground of "forum non-convenience".

The plaintiffs in the suits contended that the principle of "forum non-convenience" was not incorporated and recognized under the Code. They averred that if a part of the cause of action had arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court, the plaint could not be rejected and hence the plaintiff(s) cannot be directed to approach another Court. Heinz contrary to this argued that the principle of "forum non-convenience" was not alien to Section 20 of the Code and is protected by Section 151 of the Code. They alleged that the present cases are one of forum shopping and directly a result of the advertisement of GSK and Horlicks which is a subject matter of challenge before the Bombay High Court. It was also noted that Section 151 of the Code recognizes the power of the Court to do justice in the facts and circumstances of the case but the said power could not be exercised to pass an order, which is contrary to or is prohibited by a provision in the Code. It was found that when there is an express or implied prohibition in the Code itself, power under Section 151 could not be exercised to negate or contrary to the provision and in the presence of a prohibition, section 151 of the Code cannot be applied.

The Court propounded that it was clear that if no specific provision prohibiting the grant of relief sought in an application filed under Section 151 of the Code, the Courts have all the necessary powers under Section 151 CPC to pass a suitable order to prevent the abuse of the process of court. Therefore, the court stated that while exercising the power under Section 151 CPC, it must be considered whether exercise of such power is expressly prohibited by any other provisions of the Code and if there is no such prohibition then the court must consider whether such power should be exercised or not on the basis of facts mentioned in the application.

Examining the scheme of Section 20, the Court opined that Section 20 is exhaustive and, therefore,
prohibits applicability of "forum non-convenience" which has not been directly answered in any decision. However, mulling over decisions that deal with the issue, the Court noted that Section 20 of the Code gives dominus litis to the plaintiff to file a suit in the courts located at a place where the defendant resides or works for gain or where cause of action, partly or wholly arises. However, the Court noted that it is also equally well settled that in spite of Section 20 of the Code, parties by a contract can confer sole or exclusive jurisdiction to courts at one location which otherwise has jurisdiction and exclude jurisdiction of other courts. In other words, the Court stated that Section 20 of the Code does not bar or prohibit parties from entering into a contract or mutual understanding that courts only at a particular location will have exclusive jurisdiction to decide the disputes and oust jurisdiction of courts located at other locations. The only condition is that the exclusive or the sole Court should otherwise have territorial jurisdiction to decide the disputes in terms of Section 20 of the Code. The Court stated that the principle of "forum non-convenience" does not confer jurisdiction on a court contrary to Section 20 of the Code but applies when a court otherwise has jurisdiction but for valid, sound and good reasons does not wish to entertain a suit.

Section 10 dealing with Stay of a Suit was also looked into. The cause of action in the suits at the Bombay and Delhi High Courts were noted to have been different advertisements but the legal issue and inter connection between the alleged infringing advertisements both by the plaintiff(s ) herein and by the defendant herein were said to be undeniable and even admitted to in the plaints. Restating the objective of Section 10 to be to obviate contradictory judgments, avoid multiplicity of proceedings, delay and prevent protraction of litigation, the same was not thought to be contradictory to the principle of "forum non-convenience". The Court also noted that a discretionary character was existent to the said principle and stated that an alternative forum could be invoked only when the forum is more appropriate than the forum of which jurisdiction is invoked. The principle has to be rarely invoked and when court is fully satisfied that the discretion should be exercised. It was also opined that no fixed or strait jacket principal could be laid down but the general objective is to prevent a party from deliberately creating a situation which will cause confusion or conflicting judgments.

On contemplation of the decisions of the various other courts as well as the rationale behind the principle of "forum non-convenience", the Delhi High Court stated that the present case, fell within one of those rare cases where a party deliberately and intentionally invoked jurisdiction of a court, which has jurisdiction to entertain a suit under Section 20 of the Code, but the interest of justice and equity requires that the plaintiff(s) should be asked to approach the court where the parties are already litigating. The Court noted that the two conditions to be satisfied for the principle of "forum non-convenience" to be applicable were met with in the present case. The Court noted that the advertisement being the subject of litigation of the Bombay High Court would necessarily call for examination and comments on the advertisement of the Bombay High Court. The Court also stated that the possibility of confusion or conflicting decisions, causing prejudice to the parties could not be ruled out, in view of the interim application for injunction still being pending before the Bombay High Court.

The Court reiterated that the principle of "forum non-convenience" be applied rarely when there are overwhelming facts and interest of justice requires that a Court that has jurisdiction should not adjudicate the suit/legal proceedings. Stating that the principle be applied strictly and with great caution and care, any failure to do so, was said to result in abuse of process of Court causing grave injustice. In this view, the plaints were return and rejected, and were advised that they were at liberty to file fresh suits at Bombay High Court. However, the Delhi High Court attached a clarification in its judgment to the effect that the opinion expressed on merits was restricted only for the purpose of deciding and passing the present order and that the same was not binding and would not influence any other or future litigation between the parties.

© Lex Orbis 2009

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions