India: “BUDDHA-BAR”: A Debate On Transborder Reputation

Last Updated: 4 March 2009

Transborder reputation has been a matter of dispute, largely elucidated and deliberated upon in the law of trademarks. The principle however finds itself extrapolated to other realms of intellectual property disputes as well. Becoming the bone of contention, "BUDDHA-BAR", the name of an album, found itself in an appeal before the Division Bench of Delhi High Court in the case of Kiran Jogani v. George V. Records, SARL [2008 (38) PTC 69 (Del.) (DB)]

Involving the issue of transborder reputation in the mark "BUDDHA-BAR" for music albums and the allegation of an infringement thereof, Kiran Jogani and Another appeared before the High Court of Delhi in an appeal against the decision in the civil suit filed on the Original Side of this Court by George V. Records, SARL. An interlocutory application for injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 had been filed along with the plaint by George Records, which ex-parte met with success and thus an application under Order 39 Rule 4 for vacation of the interim injunction had been filed, whereby the interim injunction was confirmed.

George Records claimed that the trademark BUDDHA-BAR had been first adopted and used in the year 1996 as the name of a restaurant in Paris by their affiliates. They stated that the name had acquired reputation and the music played at the restaurant was compiled into CDs as they became extremely popular. These CDs were sold under the name BUDDHA-BAR from the year 1999 onwards and George V. Records averred that BUDDHA-BAR was connected via its affiliate. They claimed that they had acquired trademark registration in several jurisdictions as also reputation.

It was pleaded that the adoption of the mark BUDDHA-BAR by Jogani was dishonest. The mark was said to constitute a unique combination of two words which would otherwise have no correlation with each other and the adoption of an identical mark in relation to identical goods being music albums without any explanation regarding the adoption depicted dishonest intent on the part Jogani.

Evidence in the form of paper cuttings of magazines and other publications was filed to establish that the mark had acquired reputation all over the world, including India. Jogani on the other hand showed a single page advertisement to demonstrate the adoption of this mark prior to George Recordings. They stated that there was blatant copying of the artistic features of the inlay card of the music album BUDDHA-BEATS released by Jogani in 2001.

Several pleas were raised in the course of argument, which were dealt with by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order, who emphasized that passing off is an action of deceit and thus prior adoption and use of the mark as also it having acquired reputation and goodwill distinctive of the goods of the plaintiff in the country of origin is a necessity. He also noted that connection in the course of trade between the goods of the two parties by use of identical or a deceptively similar mark must be established. Heavy reliance was placed upon a large amount of published material brought on record to grant the interim injunction. The factum of the failure of Jogani to give any satisfactory explanation in relation to adoption of the mark BUDDHA-BAR was emphasized not to be honest.

In view of lapse of almost four years since the stage of the interlocutory injunction, the Court suggested that a more advisable course of action was to expedite the hearing of the suit. However, the counsel for Jogani was of the view that recording of evidence would take some time and thus he would like to invite a judgment on the appeal against the decision on the interlocutory application.

Considering the scope of scrutiny by the appellate Court in matters of grant or refusal of such interim injunction, the legal position in Wander Ltd. and Anr. v. Antox India P .Ltd; 1990 Supp (1) SCC 727 was taken into account whereby it is not the function of this Court as an appellate Court to substitute its own discretion with the exercise of discretion by the Trial Court except where the discretion has been shown to be exercised arbitrarily, capriciously and perversely or where the Court has ignored the settled principles of law regulating the grant or refusal of interlocutory injunctions. Further, the precedent states that so long as the exercise of discretion by the Trial Court is reasonable and in a judicial manner, no interference is called for. It is within this limited scope that the scrutiny in an appeal has to be made.

Jogani's counsel asserted that the Trial Judge had acted in an arbitrary fashion in the exercise of his discretion. The court taking note of the argument stated that the grant or refusal of injunction has to be on the triple criteria of a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irretrievable loss and injury and that the mere fact that the parties may have an opportunity to file additional documents subsequently is not a relevant ground to form a prima facie opinion. The Court stated that looking at the extent to which the Single Judge has dwelled into the agreements and evidence, the findings of the learned Single Judge cannot be faulted.

The Court also stated that Jogani's contention of the evidentiary material being in the form of newspaper reports, magazines and other publications be ignored the nature of that being secondary evidence, was unacceptable. No doubt, the plaintiff would have the duty to prove the evidence on record by leading appropriate evidence, but that stage had not arisen. The Court stated that at the interlocutory stage, where the parties are yet to have the opportunity to produce witnesses to prove the documents, such material cannot be shut out especially taking into consideration the nature of controversy in the present matter.

The court noted that material akin to newspaper clippings would be necessary to establish transborder reputation. The Court stated that it is not necessary that only an invoice of sale would be the relevant evidence and thus merely because the invoice is just after the alleged propagation of the CD album by Jogani itself could not defeat the rights of George V. Records on the face of other voluminous prima facie material in support of their transborder reputation.

The counsel for Jogani also brought in the aspect of Section 52A of the Copyright Act and consequent punishment which may follow under Section 68A of the said Act. This plea had been brushed aside by the Single Judge to be considered at the time of trial. However the Court stated that the prima facie finding on the effect of the same is liable to be given and thereafter one can observe that the parties would have the rights to produce the evidence in that behalf. George Records stated that the plea with respect to the sections was not the focus of the submissions and that transborder reputation was the only issue to be dealt with. They also stated by George Records that there had been no lack of compliance with the said provision.

George Records pleaded that BUDDHA-BAR albums may have been sold in India, but they were not published in India and thus Section 52A of the said Act was not attracted. Further, the attention of this Court had been drawn to Section 5 of the said Act which specifies as to when a work is first deemed to be published in India. According to the provision, the work is deemed to be simultaneously published in India and another country if the time between the publication in India and publication in such country does not exceed 30 days. The Court found that since this did not happen, no publication in India so as to infringe the provisions of Section 52A of the Act had taken place. The Court noted that the penalty for contravention of Section 52A was provided for under Section 68A of the said Act of imprisonment extending up to 3 years and fine. The counsel for the George V. Records emphasized that if there was an infringement, Jogani would have taken steps in respect of the same and the Court noted this to be sufficient to prima facie conclude that Jogani did not suspect infringement by George V. Records. The Court noted that the object of Section 52A is clear prevent piracy and counterfeiting and that the same appeared missing in the present suit.

Opining that the material placed on record had been rightly appreciated by the learned Single Judge to come to a prima facie view, the appeal was dismissed with costs.

© Lex Orbis 2009

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions