India: Delhi High Court Refuses To Interfere With CCI Prima Facie Order Post Investigation

Last Updated: 30 April 2018

Article by MM Sharma, Head Competition Law & Policy Practice, Vaish Associates, Advocates, New Delhi, India

Delhi High Court   vide its recent judgement dated 09.03.2018 has refused to interfere in a pending inquiry after the submission of the Director General's (DG) investigation report .The High Court has provided clarity on the procedural issue which will enhance the powers of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), during the post-investigation inquiry under the Competition Act, 2002("the Act").


The petitioner , Cadilla Healthcare Limited , challenged the orders dated January 16, 2018 and January 17, 2018 and order dated November 17, 2015 passed CCI/ respondent No.1 ( hereinafter , the orders) , whereby , CCI dismissed an application for review / recall of its prima facie  order passed  under section 26(1) of the Act. It was submitted that the informant (Reliance Medical Agency) had placed an order for the supply of certain drugs/ medicines on the petitioners with an advance demand draft of Rs. 1Lakh on 09.07.2015 and thereafter filed an information with the CCI on 03.08.2015 stating that it was denied supplies by the petitioners on account of not obtaining No Objection Certificate (NOC) from Chemist and Druggist Association of Baroda ("CDAB"). The petitioner challenged the impugned orders of CCI mainly on the grounds that it refused to take note of the ill motives of the informant by filing the information immediately after placing an order for supply with the petitioners and suppressing the fact that supplies were already made to the informant by the Petitioners on 29.09.2015, against the order dated 09.07.2015. Thus, alleging suppression of material facts and fraudulent conduct on the part of the informant , petitioner requested for review/ recall of the order under Section 26(1) of the Act which was rejected by the CCI vide order dated 16.01.2018 , which was under challenge in the present writ petition including many ground on merits of the case .


  1. What is the appropriate stage for Review / Recall of Section 26(1) order -   Referring to a previous judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Google wherein the Delhi High court had held that the order of CCI directing the DG, CCI in exercise of power under Section 26(1) of the Act ("prima facie order") to cause investigation is capable of review/recall, the petitioner requested for quashing of the CCI prima facie order in this case also.
  1. Whether investigation can be ordered by CCI without finding a prima facie case against a party? – The second main issue raised in the petition was whether an investigation can be legally ordered by CCI without finding a prima facie case qua a specific party, the petitioner, in this case?


*The author heads the Competition law/Antitrust practice at Vaish Associates, Advocates. Views are personal. May be reached at


The Delhi High Court relying on series of judgments, made the following significant observations in respect of the two issues as under: 

On the first issue -.  The Court, distinguishing the present case from the Google Case held that in the Google order dated 24.04.2015 it was laid down that a person/enterprise would have a right to apply for review/recall of CCI prima facie order but such a power has to be exercised on the well-recognized parameters of the power of review/recall and without the investigation already ordered being stalled indefinitely. In the Google Case when the petitioners challenged the CCI prima facie order the investigation was still underway, when the application for recall was filed and also when the petition was filed in this Court. Whereas in the present case the recall application was filed after the DG report has been submitted to CCI. The Court thus read/understood its judgment in Google Case to mean that a recall/review application can be filed before or during investigation and not after the submission of the investigation report by the DG. Once the DG report is submitted, then an action/procedure under Section 26(5) or 26(8) gets triggered, taking the case out of the realm of 26(1) or 26(2) of the Act, [which was the position in Google)]. The only remedy for the parties left was to argue the DG report on merits before the Commission and not on the order u/s 26(1) as was sought to be done in the case in hand. The same is impermissible in law, inasmuch as procedure as contemplated/provided must be allowed to be gone through. Thus the High Court is barred from interfering with the CCI inquiry proceedings post the stage of submission of the DG investigation under section 26(3) of the Act. 

On the second issue- The Delhi High Court relying on the judgement of the Supreme Court in the Excel Crop Case observed that, even if the CCI has not formed a prima facie opinion against the petitioners in its prima facie Order, the DG would still be within his power to inquire against the party if investigation reveals facts that the persons/enterprises had entered into an agreement, which is prohibited by Section 3 of the Act. The Court noted that it was precisely for this reason, that the CCI in the impugned order dated 17.11.2015 had used the words "investigate the conduct of such other party, who may have indulged in the said contravention". The said words are in conformity with the position of law as laid down by the Supreme Court in Excel Crop Case. Further, even otherwise, this issue cannot be a ground to challenge the prima facie order after the DG report has been submitted. The Court held that the stage of challenging the prima facie order stands closed once the DG report has been filed before the CCI and noted that the CCI is not under obligation to find the prima facie case against every aspect involved in the matter, as it cannot foresee and predict whether any violation of the Act would be found upon by investigation by the DG. One cannot restrict the scope of investigation, as it would defeat the very purpose of the Act which is to prevent practices having appreciable adverse effect on competition. 

Insofar as the other submissions on merits made by the petitioner were concerned such as:

  1. Mala fide /suppression of material facts by the informant amounting to fraud ;
  2. no vertical or horizontal relationship between the petitioners and the Federation/Association and as such Section 3(1) of the Act being not applicable or even otherwise, the alleged Agreement between the Association/Federation and petitioners assume to exist, the same would not fall within Section 3(3)or 3(4) of the Competition Act;
  3. proceedings are barred by res judicata/double jeopardy;
  4. Initiation of proceedings under Section 48 at preliminary stage being erroneous.

It was observed by the Delhi High Court that CCI in the impugned order has clearly left open all these questions being on merits and had observed that the petitioners shall be at liberty to argue on merits before the CCI while rebutting the evidence collected by the DG during investigation. However,  while dismissing the petition, the court clarified that when CCI is hearing the petitioners on the report of the DG, surely it will be doing so without being influenced by any finding on facts in its order rejecting the review/recall application and shall consider all the material and position of law as put forward by the petitioners and directed the CCI to complete the inquiry proceedings  most expeditiously and while ensuring that the time taken in completion of such proceedings does not adversely affect any of the parties as well as the open market in purposeful implementation of the provisions of the Act.


The present Judgment / ruling provides the much needed clarity on  two important issues viz. the stage or the timelines during which an aggrieved party may challenge the jurisdiction of the CCI and whether CCI is empowered to order an investigation without first finding a prima facie case against a specific party .The Court has restricted the scope of the CCI's power of review/recall of its prima facie order to cases where the investigation is yet to start or has just started without causing delay in the investigation process. This judgment would definitely encourage CCI and will provide clarity to the aggrieved companies on the issue of proper time lines and the scope of the order under section 26(1). The Petitioner may, however, still challenge this ruling before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court.

© 2018, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions