India: CCI Imposes Highest Penalty In Terms Of Profit On A Hard Core Cartel For Coal Liaisoning Services For Supply Of Coal To Seven Thermal Power Stations Of Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd.

Last Updated: 1 May 2018

Article by MM Sharma, Head Competition Law & Policy Practice, Vaish Associates, Advocates, New Delhi, India

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) vide its order dated January 10, 2018 has exposed a cartel of three top coal liaisoning agents –Nair Coal Services Ltd.(NCSL)/OP2, Karam Chand Thapar (KCT)/OP 3 and Naresh Kumar &Co. (NKC)/OP4 in getting work of coal liaisoning ( involving linkage materialization, shortage minimization and quality monitoring) in respect of the tenders floated by Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. (MAHAGENCO) for award of contract of coal liaisoning work for its various thermal power stations ( TPSs) in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(1) read with Section3(3)(c) and Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( the Act).

The CCI, while imposing the highest penalty, at the rate of 2 times of the total profits, observed that the case fell in the category of hard core cartels whereby the three opposite parties divided the seven TPSs amongst them in such a way that in each tender floated by MAHAGENCO a particular coal liaisoning agent will emerge as the lowest bidder in the pre-selected TPS (NCSL – Chandrapur, Nasik ;KCT- Khaparkheda, Parli, Koradi and NKC –Bhusawal, Paras) .CCI imposed penalty earned by each of the opposite parties during the period 2010-11 to 2012-13 from provision of coal liaisoning services to MAHAGENCO in respect of tenders awarded during the period 2009 to 2014 ,amounting to Rs. 7.16 crore, Rs. 111.60 crore and Rs. 16.92 crore upon NCSL, KCT and NKC, respectively.

Background and Facts of the case

MAHAGENCO is responsible for generation of power in the State of Maharashtra. For the purpose of running its 7 Thermal Power Stations ('TPSs'), it obtains raw coal from the subsidiaries of Coal India Limited ('CIL') [viz. Western Coalfields Limited ('WCL'), South-Eastern Coalfields Limited ('SECL'), Mahanadi Coalfields Limited ('MCL')] and Singareni Coal Company Limited ('SCCL'). In order to procure quality coal and to make proper supervision of the said supply through rail and other modes of transportation, MAHAGENCO engages services of liaisoning agents. As per the Information, in March, 2005, MAHAGENCO had invited tenders for coal liaisoning, to supervise the quality and quantity of coal supplied to its TPSs from the subsidiaries of CIL. Four companies submitted their bids to the said tender process i.e. B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. ('BSN') and OP-2 to OP-4. The rate quoted by BSN was the lowest. However, the said company was not awarded the work in spite of being the L1 bidder due to commencement of litigation before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. After prolonged litigation before the Nagpur Bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 2444 and 4514 of 2005 and thereafter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 4613 of 2006, work order was finally issued to BSN in 2009. However, the same, after a while (9 months) was terminated. The termination of work order was stated to be pending arbitral proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Post-termination, the contracts were awarded by MAHAGENCO to OP-2 to OP-4 on area wise basis and the Informant has alleged that since then, MAHAGENCO has been awarding contracts regularly in favor of OP-2 to OP-4 only in the geographically distributed market, which was actually agreed between them by means of entering into a cartel. The Informant stated that OP Nos. 2 to 4 being in collusion with OP-1 have conveniently divided amongst themselves 7 TPSs for doing liaison work by effectively thwarting any newcomer or any other existing company from participating in the tender process. It was also stated that MAHAGENCO is favoring formation of such cartel, particularly between OP-2 to OP-4, as is clear from the fact that since September 2009, MAHAGENCO has floated 4 tenders for granting work of supervision and monitoring of loading of coal into wagons for its TPSs by rail mode from WCL, SECL, MCL and SCCL; however, the said tenders have been cancelled for various reasons. The Informant also alleged that cancellation of such tenders by MAHAGENCO actually resulted in OP-2 to OP-4 becoming beneficiaries of the stop-gap arrangement. It was accordingly alleged that OP-2 to OP-4 have violated clause (d) of Sub-Section (3) of Section 3 of the Act as they have engaged in collusive bidding for projects with MAHAGENCO thereby scuttling any competition between themselves and raising unnecessary dispute with regard to qualification of any other competitor in the market. It was also submitted that there is also violation of clause (c) of Sub-Section (2) of Section 4 of the Act as together with MAHAGENCO, three of the leading players in the market of coal liaison/ quality/supervision work, have all colluded to deny access to other players in the market and thereby were preventing new players, if any, from participating in the bidding process. Hence, it was alleged that there was a clear violation of Section 4 of the Act also by OP-1 along with OP-2 to OP-4.

When the matter had initially come up for consideration, the Commission, by a majority order dated 11.12.2013 passed under Section 26(2) of the Act, had closed the information. However, in the appeal filed before the erstwhile Hon'ble Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT), the said order of the Commission was set aside and the Director General (DG) was directed to investigate the case and submit its report to the Commission. Noticeably, while directing investigation by the DG, the COMPAT particularly directed that the DG shall not presume that MAHAGENCO was a part of the cartel with the OP2 to OP4.

Accordingly, the DG investigated the matter and, after seeking extension, submitted the investigation report to the Commission on 06.06.2016.

Investigation by the DG

On investigation, the DG noted that there existed a distinct pattern of quoting by OP-2 to OP-4 in respect of the tenders floated by MAHAGENCO during 2001 to 2013. On the basis of evidence collected, statements of the representatives of OPs as well as third parties and other material available on record, the DG noted that in the tenders floated by MAHAGENCO for procurement of services of coal liaisoning agents vide Tender No. T-03/2005 and subsequent tenders (till 2013), OP-2 to OP-4 had acted in a concerted manner by forming a cartel. The DG noted that OP-2 to OP-4 had distributed the different TPSs in various MAHAGENCO tenders for coal liaisoning. The said distribution was also depicted in Tender No. 03/2005 wherein allegations of cartelization were first levelled by MAHAGENCO. Further, in the subsequent tenders till (last) tender of 2013, the same conduct (except in one instance) was observed by the DG. The conduct of these OPs in geographically dividing the tender areas and accordingly giving their quotations to carry out such division was found to be in violation of Section 3(3) read with Section 3(1) of the Act. Further, the DG opined that through the said concert, OP-2 to OP-4 were directly determining the bid price which was a violation of Section 3(3)(a) read with Section 3(1) of the Act as these OPs first decided to divide the TPSs in different MAHAGENCO tenders and thereafter, to ensure such division, quoted accordingly in successive tenders. By sharing of tenders geographically, these OPs were also found to have contravened the provisions of Section 3(3)(c) read with Section 3(1) of the Act. The said conduct of OP-2 to OP-4 was also found by the DG as amounting to bid rigging/collusive bidding in violation of S section 3(3)(d) read with Section 3(1) of the Act.

CCI's Observations

After considering the objections filed by OP-2 to OP4 to the findings in the DG investigation report and after hearing both the Informant and the OPs in a detailed inquiry, CCI, agreed with the findings in the DG investigation report and found that the evidence on record relied upon by the DG, particularly, from the pattern of bidding the lowest rates for the pre-selected TPS by the respective OPs , the anti-competitive arrangement between OP2 to OP 4 stood proved . CCI carefully examined various pieces of evidence put together by the DG, which included quoting of identical basic rates in respect of the tender floated by MAHAGENCO, quoting of rates in a manner so as each of them gets the chosen TPSs, making dummy bidders for the MAHAGENCO tenders by OP2, and found that the OPs were not able to offer any convincing justification for their conduct, which showed clear co-ordination between them. CCI also found that the anti -competitive coordination by the OPs, apparent from the pattern of bidding by the OPs, was also corroborated by the various "plus factors" such as no plausible explanation or justification for quoting of identical basic rates by these OPs, no justification for quoting lower rates for chosen TPSs and the remaining two OPs quoting higher rates for such TPSs in a mutual way so as to allocate TPSs amongst themselves, purchasing of tender documents by these OPs on the same dates, exchange of letters/ pre-bid queries amongst OPs, financial transactions inter se OPs including sharing of ledgers and cooking up of bogus entries in the books of account to show losses in MAHAGENCO tenders etc.

Conclusion

CCI, accordingly, found that "it is apparent that OP-2 to OP-4 did not compete in securing business as would have been expected as prudent business behaviour in a competitive market. Rather, OP-2 to OP-4 seem to be comfortable in continuing with their existing businesses under an arrangement to divide the market " and observed that "the Commission is of opinion that the present case falls in the category of hard core cartels as OPs reached an agreement to submit collusive tenders and to divide the markets. Thus, the case deserves to be dealt with utmost severity. Accordingly, the Commission notes that it is a fit case for invoking the proviso to Section 27 of the Act and decides to impose a penalty on OP-2, OP-3 and OP-4 at the rate of 2 times of their total profits earned from provision of coal liaisoning services to all power generators, and not limited to the profits generated from MAHAGENCO alone, for continuance of the cartel for 2010-11 to 2012-13 years only based on the financial statements filed by them. Noticeably, regarding the quantum of penalty, the CCI rejected the specific request made by OPs that penalty may be restricted to the relevant turnover derived by them from the impugned tenders of MAHAGENCO, in terms of the land mark judgment of the Supreme Court in the Excel Corp Case and observed that "the contention of the parties that only the revenue generated from the impugned tender alone would constitute relevant turnover, is not tenable. In Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition Commission of India & Ors., Appeal No. 79 of 2012, the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal vide its order dated 29.10.2013 (in para 67) categorically observed that turnover cannot be restricted to supply made only to the concerned procurer whose tenders were rigged. The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 08.05.2017 dismissed the appeal filed against the aforesaid order and upheld the order passed by the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal. Similarly, the Commission is of the opinion that it is the total revenue generated from all coal liaisoning services that is relevant for the present purposes and the contention of the parties that business of coal liaisoning in respect of washed coal is not akin to the contracts under consideration, is both flawed and misconceived. It makes no difference as to coal liaisoning services are provided for washed coal or raw coal. "

COMMENT: The present order of the CCI indicates a hardening of stance of the Commission towards hard core cartels, which is evident from not only the highest ever penalties imposed in terms of double the size of the profit (before this order, the highest penalty imposed was at 1.0 Times the profit in the case of supply of brushless DC fans to the Indian Railways in suo moto case no. 03 of 2015 imposed on only one of the alleged cartel participant. The order is under challenge in an appeal filed before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) but also from the fact that the Commission has rejected the argument of the OPs to restrict the penalty to the turnover derived from the cartelized product in the State of Maharashtra . Of course, the order will be challenged by the OPs before the NCLAT and the outcome on the issue of quantum of penalty would be worth watching for.

Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

© 2018, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Industry
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions