India: Arbitration In India – The Way Forward

Last Updated: 26 April 2018
Article by Maneck Mulla and Akshita Bhargava

Introduction: The 2015 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("2015 Amendment Act") were aimed at encouraging dispute resolution through arbitration and promoting arbitration as a quick and effective alternative to litigation and limit judicial intervention. However, a need was felt to further reform the arbitration regime in India and address certain issues that were faced with the introduction of the 2015 Amendment Act.

Domestic arbitrations mostly comprise of ad hoc arbitration. For a long time, a need was felt to promote institutional arbitration in India and strengthen the arbitral institutions in India. In this context, a High Level Committee chaired by Justice B. N. Srikrishna, Retired Judge, Supreme Court of India was set up to make India a robust centre for international and domestic arbitration. The Committee submitted its Report to the Government on 30th July, 2017 (the "Committee Report").

The Committee Report recognised that India has not fully embraced institutional arbitration as the preferred mode of arbitration and the caseload of Indian arbitral institutions like the Indian Council of Arbitration, the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration is significantly lower than the international arbitral institutions. Accordingly, the Committee Report recommended measures to promote institutional arbitration like Government support in setting up infrastructure for arbitral institutions, provisions to include mandatory reference of disputes with a value of more than INR 5 Crores to arbitral institutions, amongst others.

Key recommendations of the Committee Report for promoting India as an arbitration friendly jurisdiction included setting up of an Arbitration Promotion Council of India having representations from various stakeholders for grading arbitral institutions in India, creation of a specialist arbitration bar, creation of a specialist arbitration bench, application of Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "Act") to international arbitration as well, limiting the application of Section 29A of the Act to domestic arbitrations only and not international commercial arbitrations, providing a six month period for submission of pleadings, adding a new sub-section to Section 48 of the Act to provide that an application for enforcement of a foreign award shall be disposed of within a period of 1 year from the date the same is filed, immunity for arbitrators, confidentiality of arbitration proceedings, appointment of arbitrators to be made by arbitration institutions, provisions enabling recognition of emergency awards by emergency arbitrators, maintaining an electronic depository of arbitral awards, amongst others.

On 7th March, 2018, the Union Cabinet approved the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2018 for introduction in Parliament with an objective to streamline the arbitration process and remove the practical difficulties faced by the amendments made to the Arbitration Act in 2015. The proposed amendments are based on the recommendations of the Committee Report.

Highlights and our analysis of the proposed amendments to the Act:

  • Facilitating speedy appointment of arbitrators through designated arbitral institutions by the Supreme Court for international arbitration and the designated arbitral institutions by the High Court for other cases, without approaching the courts in this regard.

    We understand that approaching the arbitral institutions directly for appointment of arbitrators will lessen the burden of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, reduce the delays faced by the parties in appointing arbitrators and limit the court intervention in the arbitration process. However, it remains to be seen if the arbitral institutions will have powers akin to Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 like courts and whether they will be given the power to adjudicate on matters where the validity or existence of arbitration agreement itself is in dispute.
  • Setting up of an independent body namely, the Arbitration Council of India ("ACI") which will be an independent body corporate to grade arbitral institutions and accredit arbitrators by laying down norms, take steps to promote arbitration and other ADR mechanism, maintain professional standards in relation to arbitration and other ADR mechanisms. An electronic depository of all arbitral awards shall be maintained by the ACI.

    The Committee Report had recommended setting up of Arbitration Promotion Council of India ("APCI"), an autonomous body with representatives from industry bodies such as Confederation of Indian Industry, FICCI and the ASSOCHAM, the bar and the Government. It was recommended that the APCI shall have a Governing Board with members who have substantial experience in arbitration law and practice. A three-year term for each member of the Governing board was recommended. Besides, the Committee Report recommended that the APCI have a CEO having minimum qualifications as laid down therein and a professionally run Secretariat.

    The amendment to create the ACI is a welcome step and shall ensure that professional standards are maintained in arbitration and efficiency is improved. Accreditation of arbitrators is in recognition of the practice followed internationally where several bodies/ professional institutes like Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, the Resolution Institute, the British Columbia Arbitration and Mediation Institute exist to accredit arbitrators. However, it is essential that the constitution, functions and limitations of ACI be clearly defined in the Amendment Act.
  • S. 29A(1) of the Act is proposed to be amended to exclude International Arbitrations and provide that the time limit to make an arbitral award in other arbitrations shall be within 12 months from the completion of pleadings of the parties.

    The time limit of 12 months (extendable by 6 months) was criticised for restricting party autonomy and taking a one-size-fits-all approach with no reference to the complexity of the matter. It was criticised for forcing the parties to approach the courts where arbitral proceedings were not completed within the stipulated timeline. The international arbitral institutions also criticised the timeline provided by S. 29A.

    It is proposed to amend sub section (1) of section 29A by excluding International Arbitrations from the bounds of timeline thereby endeavouring to follow rules of international arbitral institutions. As far as domestic arbitrations are concerned, it is proposed that the time period of 12 months should begin from completion of pleadings. Whilst the recommendations in relation to domestic arbitrations may well be justified, in our view, the same is under a threat of being diluted if there's leniency in condoning delays in filing of pleadings by parties.
  • A new section 42A is proposed to be inserted to provide that the confidentiality of all arbitration proceedings except awards shall be maintained by the arbitrator and the arbitral institutions. Further, another section 42B is proposed to be inserted to provide immunity to arbitrators from suit or other legal proceedings for any action or omission done in good faith in the course of arbitral proceedings.

    It will be interesting to see how the provision of maintaining confidentiality will be reconciled with the requirement of a party whilst preparing an application under Section 9 or 27 of the Act.

    In our view, the parties would necessarily have to rely upon arbitration proceedings whilst approaching the courts.
  • Applicability of the 2015 Amendment Act

    A new section 87 is proposed to be inserted to clarify that unless parties agree otherwise, the 2015 Amendment Act shall only apply to arbitral proceedings which have commenced after the commencement of the 2015 Amendment Act i.e. after 23rd October, 2015 and to court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such arbitral proceedings which have commenced after the commencement of the 2015 Amendment Act.

    Section 26 of the 2015 Amendment Act remained silent on the applicability of the 2015 Amendment Act to court proceedings in relation to arbitrations which commenced prior to 23rd October, 2015. Various High Courts in India have taken divergent views on the applicability of the 2015 Amendment Act. According to the Committee Report, uncertainty and prejudice to parties would prevail if the 2015 Amendment Act is permitted to apply to pending court proceedings related to arbitrations which commenced prior to 23rd October, 2015 and accordingly recommended to clarify Section 26 of the 2015 Amendment Act to apply to only arbitral proceedings commenced on or after the commencement of the 2015 Amendment Act and to court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such arbitral proceedings only.

    The proposed Section 87 was intended to put to rest the uncertainty created by the conflicting judgments of various High Courts regarding the applicability of the 2015 Amendment Act.

    However, in a recent decision in Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Kochi Cricket Private Limited (SLP(C) Nos. 19545-19546 of 2016) dated 15th March, 2018, the Supreme Court has critiqued the proposed Section 87 on the ground that the said provision would bring a substantial number of court proceedings initiated on or after 23rd October, 2015 (in relation to arbitrations commenced prior to 23rd October, 2015) under the purview of the pre amendment regime "resulting in delay of disposal of arbitral proceedings by increased interference of courts, which ultimately defeats the object of 1996 Act." While interpreting Section 26 of the 2015 Amendment Act, the Court observed that the provision has to be construed literally first, and then purposively and pragmatically. Accordingly, in relation to the applicability of the 2015 Amendment Act to Section 36 of the Act, the Court held that Section 26 of the Amendment Act makes it clear that the Amendment Act as a whole is prospective in nature, but has also gone on to clarify that Section 36 of the Act as substituted by the 2015 Amendment Act would apply even to pending Section 34 applications on the date of commencement of the 2015 Amendment Act. The Court further directed that a copy of its judgement be sent to the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Attorney General of India for consideration in view of the proposed amendment to the Arbitration Act.

    The decision furthers the judiciary's intent to make India an arbitration friendly jurisdiction and extends the benefits of the progressive regime of the 2015 amendments to the court proceedings instituted prior to the introduction of the 2015 Amendment Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions