ARTICLE
4 December 2017

Recent Delhi High Court Judgment

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
Sexual harassment as defined under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 ("Act") includes any unwelcome physical contact and advances.
India Employment and HR

Sexual harassment as defined under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 ("Act") includes any unwelcome physical contact and advances. While the Act and its interpretation has always been a perception based law where the perception of the aggrieved women as to what she may constitute as sexual harassment, duly supported by relevant evidence, has taken precedence. "

However, the Delhi High Court, in the case of Shanta Kumar versus Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and Others (MANU/DE/3392/2017), while deliberating into the allegations of sexual harassment filed by the complainant, the court has stipulated that physical contact or advances would constitute sexual harassment provided such physical contact is a part of the sexually determined behaviour. Such physical contact must be in the context of a behaviour which is sexually oriented. Plainly, a mere accidental physical contact, even though unwelcome, would not amount to sexual harassment. Similarly, a physical contact which has no undertone of a sexual nature and is not occasioned by the gender of the complainant may not necessarily amount to sexual harassment.

This latest ruling is indicative of the judicial intent to take into consideration other surrounding factors such as whether any unwelcome behaviour is sexually oriented or not besides the perception of the aggrieved women, while inquiring into the allegations of sexual harassment.

This update is authored by Clasis Law, Clyde & Co's associated firm in India

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More