India: Understanding The Legal Position Of Flat Buyers Under The Insolvency And Banking Code: Whether Financial Creditors, Operational Creditors, Or A Third/Separate Class Of Creditors?

Last Updated: 24 August 2017
Article by Anirban Bhattacharya and Bharat Chugh

The Jaypee Infratech Insolvency has once again brought to the fore the issue of legal position of flat buyers and remedies available to them under the Insolvency and Banking Code ("IBC"). This article is an attempt to briefly discuss as to whether such flat buyers qualify as 'Operational' or 'Financial' Creditors; or they constitute a separate class of creditors, and if yes, the extent of their rights under IBC.

The recent NCLAT decision in Nikhil Mehta v. AMR Infrastructure1 is a good starting point. In this case the NCLAT ruled that a purchaser of real estate, under an 'Assured-return' plan, would qualify as a 'Financial Creditor' for the purposes of the Insolvency and Banking Code ("IBC") and therefore, entitled to initiate insolvency process against the builder, in case of non-payment of such 'Assured/Committed return'.

The facts in Nikhil Mehta (supra) were pretty straightforward: The Appellant had booked a residential unit, office space and a shop in a project being developed by AMR. The unit remained a 'paper project' and was never delivered to the Appellant. Fortunately, the Appellant had a MoU with AMR, whereby, in view of a substantial down-payment made by the Appellant, AMR had assured 'Assured/Committed returns' to them, from the date of execution of the MoU till the handing over of the physical possession of the unit(s).

All was good as long as AMR kept paying the 'Assured returns'; however, the payments dwindled and then stopped altogether. The cheques issued in discharge of liability also bounced. Despite various demands, no further payments were made. This, the Appellant argued, was in contravention of the MoU and amounted to non-payment of admitted 'debt' and on this premise Insolvency Process was initiated by the Appellant in the capacity of 'Financial Creditor(s)'.

The NCLT dismissed the Application ruling that the agreement in question was a 'pure and simple agreement of sale and purchase of a piece of property and has not acquired the status of a financial debt as the transaction does not have consideration for the time value of money. The NCLT held that the monies were not disbursed by the Appellant 'against the consideration for the time value of money', and the clause relating to 'assured return' is associated with the delivery of possession and is not a 'Financial Debt', whichever way one looks at it.

Arguments-

Aggrieved by the decision, the Appellant appealed to the NCLAT, where it was argued that through this mechanism of 'Assured returns', a huge amount of money was mobilized by AMR to aid the development of the project, without any semblance of a collateral or security. In absence of this scheme, AMR would have been constrained to procure this amount from financial institutions. This amount was secured from unsuspecting buyers on the guarantee of 'Assured/Committed returns'. It was argued that this made the Appellant more akin to an 'Investor' or 'Creditor' to whom money is owed, rather than a mere purchaser of property. Reliance was further placed on the admitted and documented payment of 'Commitment Charges' by AMR to the Appellant under the head of 'Financial Costs'. This, according to the Appellant, manifested that AMR itself treated the liability towards the Appellant as a 'Financial Debt' owed to a 'Financial Creditor' and not merely consideration received towards allotment of unit.

Flat Buyers as 'Financial Creditors'

The NCLAT ruled in favour of the Appellant and held it to be a 'Financial Creditor'. The decision read: "It is clear that Appellants are 'investors' and has chosen 'committed return plan. The Respondent in their turn agreed upon to pay monthly committed return to investors."

It is palpable that what weighed heavily with the NCLAT was the fact that the amount deposited by 'investors', including the appellant "was shown as committed return while giving the 'financial cost'/at par with interest on loans". Further, AMR had deducted Tax at source ("TDS") on the 'Assured return' payments made to the Appellant under the head of 'Interest, other than Interest on securities', thereby making the entire arrangement more identifiable as a loan than anything else, on which periodical interest was due and payable.

NCLAT further ruled that the 'debt' in this case was disbursed against the consideration for the 'time value of money' which is the key ingredient to be satisfied in order for an arrangement to qualify as 'Financial Debt' and for the lender to qualify as a 'Financial Creditor', under the scheme of IBC.

In this regard, it was observed "For every calendar month the Corporate Debtor (AMR) was liable to pay committed return w.e.f January, 2009 till the date of handing over of the possession to the appellants. Therefore, it is clear that the amount disbursed by the appellants was "against the consideration of the time value of money and the Respondent-Corporate Debtor raised the amount by way of sale-purchase agreement, having a commercial effect of borrowing".

With these observations, Appellant was held to be a 'Financial Creditor'.

L & L Comment-

Though the judgment does not incisively examine the nuances of the concept of 'time value of money' and the various types of arrangements included within the definition of 'Financial Debt' u/s 5(8) of IBC, however, what cannot be taken away from it is the fact that it is extremely intuitive and logically sound. It demonstrates eminent common sense and appears to be a correct application of the concept of 'time value of money'. It recognizes that a purchaser of a real estate unit is under no obligation to pay a substantial amount of money as down-payment if the possession of the unit is not likely to be handed over to him in the near future. In that scenario, the builder would have to arrange finance from independent sources for the development of the project. This would not only require collateral/security but involve imposition of extremely onerous conditions, including but not limited to a relatively exorbitant rate of 'interest'. Simply put, a bank lending money to the builder, needless to state, would qualify as a 'Financial Creditor' and entitled to all the rights emanating from such an arrangement under IBC, including the right to initiate insolvency process under IBC, in case of a default in repayment of debt.

From that viewpoint, if the builder succeeds in inviting funds from an individual purchaser, as opposed to a Bank, on much more favorable terms, in that case - it does not stand to reason as to why that individual purchaser should not be entitled to similar protection as a Bank, when it is essentially serving the same purpose. Any other view discriminates between an individual purchaser of a real estate unit and the Bank, and to the former's detriment.

It also needs to remembered that the purchaser of a real estate unit under such an arrangement is parting with a huge amount of money upfront, but getting the possession of the subject real estate unit much later; therefore, he deserves to be recouped for the period during which he is deprived of the use and enjoyment of 'money' and is also not in possession of the unit. If that is not the case, then why would a rational buyer defer receipt of benefit/consideration to the future, if he could have the same consideration now. For instance, a purchaser willing to make payment of a huge amount at one shot may very well go in for house that is ready to move-in, rather than hold up his investment for a future benefit.

Alternatively, if he does not want to make a huge payment upfront, he may not pay the builder a substantial down-payment and invest the same money in something else and earn interest instead. Now, since he does not take that option and pays that money to the builder instead (without corresponding delivery of possession of property), he deserves to be rewarded for the delayed possession, which in this case is through the 'Assured/Committed Return' Scheme.

The opportunity cost of foregoing the use of a substantial amount of money, while waiting for the possession of the unit, has to be kept in mind. Since a buyer stays out of enjoyment of money as well as the property, for a long period of time, the consideration for him to still make the payment and wait for the real estate unit is nothing but the periodic 'Assured Return' that he is guaranteed, which has the affect of offsetting, at least to some extent, the risk factor and uncertainty inherent in delayed possession.

Money today is more valuable than same amount of money tomorrow. Possession of a sum of money today is certain but expectation of the same amount of money in future involves uncertainty. There is a possibility that the future money never gets repaid and possession of the property never delivered. This is where 'Assured-return' scheme kicks in and tries to neutralize that risk. This is the concept of 'time value of money', and forms the cornerstone of all banking and financial systems.

The payment of 'interest' on the amount paid by purchaser is nothing but recognition of 'time value of money'. The judgment correctly brings within the fold of 'Financial Debt' such an arrangement and allows the purchaser to invoke insolvency as a 'Financial Creditor'. Protection of 'time value of money' was one of the driving forces behind IBC.

This judgment is all the more important for one more reason: Earlier this year, the NCLT in Col. Vinod Awasthy v. AMR Infrastructure Ltd. (Principal Bench-Delhi)2 had ruled that, notwithstanding the presence of an assured return clause, a purchaser of a flat cannot be treated as a provider of 'goods' or 'services' to the builder and therefore, does not qualify as an 'Operational Creditor' and cannot initiate Insolvency Process in that capacity.

The present judgment will go on to ensure that purchasers of real estate will have an effective remedy under the IBC regime, and provide much needed succor to purchasers of 'paper houses' in 'paper towns', and ensure that what they are left with are not mere 'paper promises' and 'paper returns'.

However, with respect to flat buyers whose contracts do not incorporate such/similar clauses, it appears that they might not qualify as 'Financial' or 'Operational' creditors, and are therefore, disentitled from invoking insolvency process under IBC. However, much would depend on the nature of their agreement with the builder. Having said that, even those flat buyers, who do not qualify as either 'Financial' or 'Operational' creditors, may still file their claims with the Insolvency Resolution Professional ("IRP") in terms of form F3, provided of course, the insolvency process otherwise stands initiated at the behest of an 'Operation' or 'Financial' creditor. For those flat buyers who are interested in taking possession of their units on payment of balance amounts, once the Insolvency process is in motion, the collective wisdom of the IRP and the Creditors Committee governs whether the Company goes towards a revival (which may mean continuance of projects and delivery) or liquidation, in which case the assets are liquidated, and in all probability, flat buyers end up being entitled only to refund of their money, either as Financial or other creditors, depending on the nature of their agreement with the builder. In either case, the flat owners would be well advised to file their claims, distinctively specifying their preference for unit, rather than refund of their monies, by way of abundant caution, within their claim (Form F or C, as the case may be). Needless to state, all this raises a number of challenges, including the practicability of the maximum time limit of 270 days for evolving and presenting a revival plan failing which the Company goes into liquidation, earmarked within which is a period of 14 days for filing of claims by creditors and mere seven days for the IPR to verify those claims. All this also raises certain pressing issues as to the impact of the insolvency process on flat owners' loan agreements with their respective Banks/Financial Institutions and what happens should they continue to pay/stop paying their EMIs. In view of the prevailing uncertainty and vacuum, it is expected that judiciary would fill these gaps and clarify and streamline the process of insolvency for flat owners, without compromising/diluting the value of underlying assets.

Footnotes

* Authored by Anirban Bhattacharya, Partner & Bharat Chugh, Managing Associate at Luthra and Luthra Law Offices, New Delhi. (Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm).

1. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 7 of 2017; Judgment delivered on 21st July, 2017. The judgment has been followed by the NCLAT recently in Anil Mahindroo & And v. Earth Iconic Infrastructure (P) Ltd (Date of Decision 02.08.2017) to the same effect.

2. NCLT, Principal Bench, Delhi in CP No. (IB)-10(PB)/2017; Date of Decision 20.02.2017.

3. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India ("IBBI") recently on 16 August, 2017 amended the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Fast Track Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2017 and introduced a form (Form F) for submission of claims by creditors other than financial and operational creditors to the interim resolution professional ("IRP") by virtue of the newly inserted regulation 9A under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 carves out a detailed provision for filing and proving claims by other creditors.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Anirban Bhattacharya
Bharat Chugh
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions