India: The Disputed "Dispute" Under The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Last Updated: 18 July 2017
Article by Aayush Mitruka

Most Read Contributor in India, July 2017

The Mumbai and Delhi Benches of the Adjudicating Authority31 were seen to be at loggerheads when it came to the interpretation of the term "dispute" under the recently notified, The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("The Code").

The Code provides that an operational creditor may serve a demand notice on occurrence of a default on operational credit. Subsequently, if the corporate debtor fails to make the payment within 10 days or fails to notify the creditor 'the existence of a dispute' in relation to the requested payment, the operational creditor can make an application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process to the Adjudicating Authority under the Code in the prescribed format therein.

Under sub section 6 of section 532 of the Code, 'dispute' has been defined as follows:

"dispute includes a suit or arbitration proceedings relating to-

(a) the existence of the amount of debt;

b) the quality of goods or service; or

(c) the breach of a representation or warranty;"

The Adjudicating Authority (Mumbai Bench) was called to interpret the expression "dispute" under the Code in the case of Essar Projects India Ltd.("Essar") v. MCL Global Steel Private Limited33 . The controversy arose in the background of a contract wherein Essar was appointed to execute certain civil work and other related works. After completion of the work, Essar raised certain invoices and the same remained unpaid despite repeated reminders. Having left with no choice, the

creditor issued a demand notice under section 834 of the Code. The debtor disputed the contents and the amount stated in the said notice due to disagreement regarding the quality of construction, timeline, etc. and enforceability of contract. A revised notice was thereafter sent by the creditor and consequently an insolvency petition was filed under section 9 of the Code. The debtor argued before the Adjudicating Authority that there was a 'dispute' in existence and therefore a petition under section 935 of the Code cannot be maintained.

The creditor was quick to point out there were no proceedings pending before any authority and it was for the first time that the debtor raised a dispute in reply to the notice sent by the Creditor under section 8 of the Code. Rejecting the defense, the Hon'ble Bench categorically held that the term dispute in existence means and include "raising dispute in a court of law or arbitral tribunal before receipt of notice under section 8." Accordingly the Hon'ble Bench admitted the petition. This was a welcome decision since it clarified that a dispute cannot be raised post section 8 notice as an afterthought.

The confusion ensued when in insolvency application filed by the operational creditor M/s Annapurna Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ("Annapurna") against the debtor SORIL Infra Resources Ltd.("SORIL") before the Principal Bench36. The dispute related to payment of rent coupled with damages/ interest between the parties was subjected to arbitral proceedings. The Sole Arbitrator passed an award in favor of the Applicant, Annapurna. SORIL challenged the award under sections 3437 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("The Act") and the challenge was rejected by the Court. Annapurna issued a demand notice under

section 8 of the Code to the debtors on 13.01.2017. In its reply dated 27.01.2017, SORIL contended that the existence of debt is disputed and an appeal has also been preferred under Section 3738 of The Act against the order passed by the Court while dismissing the challenge under Section 34 of The Act. Pertinently, execution proceedings to recover the award amount were also pending. It will be beneficial to note that on the date of service of the demand notice (i.e., on 13.01.2017) no appeal under Section 37 of T h e Act was filed or pending.

The debtor disputed the debt before the Adjudicating Authority on the pretext of a pending appeal and contended that the arbitral award did not attain finality in view of the pending appeal. The Authority upheld the Respondent's argument and refused to entertain the petition even in the absence of any pending appeal on the date of Section 8 notice. The Authority reasoned that the Respondent had time to prefer an appeal and chose to depart from a literal interpretation because "extreme technicality would result in nullifying the remedy of appeal within 30 days by section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996."

The Authority further opined that a party cannot be allowed to invoke more than one proceeding simultaneously. The issue of whether rent related debts would fall within the definition of 'operational debt' under the Code was also raised. However, since this piece does not aim to address that question; I will refrain from delving into that issue.

In other words, the Bench rejected the application despite no pending dispute 'before' the receipt of a demand notice under section 8 of the Code. The ruling further assumes significance as it noted that if a party has already invoked an effective remedy, it should not be allowed to indulge in the practice of forum shopping. While the Mumbai Bench in Essar dispute adopted a text oriented approach, the Principal Bench in the Annapurna ruling chose to depart from the text and emphasized the spirit of law.

Quite recently, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Kirusa Software Private Limited v. Mobilox Innovations Private Limited39 discussed this important issue of "dispute" and "existence of dispute" under the Code. The NCLAT discussed the issue at length and remitted the case back to the Tribunal. In the instance case, the creditor raised certain invoices related to software services it provided to the debtor and subsequently on non-payment a demand notice under section 8 of the Code was sent. The debtor disputed the debt in its reply.

The Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal, in light of the Legislative intent, upon reading of the code, opined that the term "dispute" ought to be given its natural and ordinary meaning. The width of the expression "dispute" should cover all disputes on debt, default etc. and not be limited to only two ways of disputing a demand made by the operational creditor, i.e. either by showing a record of pending suit or by showing a record of a pending arbitration. The Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal further reasoned that once parties are already before any judicial forum/authority for adjudication of disputes, notice becomes irrelevant and such an interpretation renders the expression 'existence of a dispute, if any, in sub-section (2) of Section 8, otiose. It was held that the definition of dispute is not exhaustive but illustrative and the same ought to be given a wide and broad interpretation. The Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal noted:

"In view of the aforesaid discussions, we hold that the dispute as defined in sub-section (6) of Section 5 cannot be limited to a pending proceedings or lis, within the limited ambit of suit or arbitration proceedings, the word 'includes' ought to be read as "means and includes" including the proceedings initiated or pending before consumer court, tribunal, labour court or mediation, conciliation etc. If any action is taken by corporate debtor under any act or law including while replying to a notice under section 80 of CPC, 1908 or to a notice issued under Section 433 of the Companies Act or Section 59 of the Sales and Goods Act or regarding quality of goods or services provided by 'operational creditor' will come within the ambit of dispute, raised and pending within the meaning of sub-section (6) of Section 5 read with subsection (2) of Section 8 of I&B code, 2016."

Significantly, the Hon'ble Appellate Authority also ruled that the Adjudicating Authority, before admitting an application, ought to examine whether the notice of dispute actually raises a dispute qua the terms 'debt' and 'dispute' as used under the Code. This observation has raised some concerns in view of the fact that the expression 'prima facie' or any related expression does not find a mention in Sections 8 or 9 of the Code. To appreciate this in a better manner it will be helpful to reproduce the relevant provision of the Code.

Sub clause 5 of section 9 of the Code states: "(9) Application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by operational creditor.


(5) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2), by an order—

(i) admit the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor if, —

(a) the application made under sub-section (2) is complete;

(b) there is no repayment of the unpaid operational debt;

(c) the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor has been delivered by the operational creditor;

(d) no notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is no record of dispute in the information utility; and

(e) there is no disciplinary proceeding pending against any resolution professional proposed under sub-section (4), if any.

(ii) reject the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, if —

(a) the application made under sub-section (2) is incomplete;

(b) there has been repayment of the unpaid operational debt;

(c) the creditor has not delivered the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor;

(d) notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is a record of dispute in the information utility; or

(e) any disciplinary proceeding is pending against any proposed resolution professional:

Provided that Adjudicating Authority, shall before rejecting an application under subclause (a) of clause (ii) give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of the date of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority."

The importance of this authoritative pronouncement from the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal can hardly be under stated since it enlarged the scope of the expression "dispute." It has largely clarified the dispute conundrum and should ideally put the issue to rest for some time. This could also be seen as an attempt to protect the genuine debtors from the savage provisions of the Code having far reaching consequences. At the same time this decision could be misused by raising illusory and colorable 'disputes'.

The Code provides that an appeal against the order of the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal can be preferred before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India40. It will be very interesting to see how the Hon'ble Apex Court deals with this question when faced with a similar issue.


31 Adjudicating authorities in relation to insolvency resolution and liquidation for corporate persons including corporate debtors and personal guarantors thereof shall be the National Company Law Tribunal. (See Section 60 of the Code)

32 Section 5 provides for Definitions.

33 CP No. 20/1 & BP/NCLT/MAH/2017.

34 Insolvency resolution by operational creditor

35 Application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by operational creditor.

36 CP No. (IB) 22(PB)/2017.

37 The provision relates to application for setting aside an arbitral award.

38 The provision relates to Appealable orders.

39 Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) 6 of 2017.

40 Section 62 of the Code

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.