India: Who Will Bell The Apps?

Last Updated: 13 July 2017
Article by Modhulika Bose

How Facebook and WhatsApp won over Sections 4 and 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 in a Big Data Economy.

On 01.06.2017, the Competition Commission of India ('Commission') dismissed an abuse of dominance case against WhatsApp Inc. under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 ('Act'), in Case No.99 of 2016. The following case comment attempts to briefly analyze this 26(2) order ('Order') and also to contextualize it against Facebook's acquisition of WhatsApp.

On 19.02.2014, Facebook Inc. announced the acquisition of WhatsApp Inc. for approximately US $19.3 billion. The acquisition was not notifiable in India as it did not trigger the asset or turnover thresholds prescribed under Section 5 of the Act. It may also be noted that the under the Act, the Commission does not have suo-motu powers to review mergers which can potentially raise AAEC concerns unless thresholds under Section 5 have been met.

The Commission got its first opportunity to study the said acquisition for its adverse effects on Competition in India when in the latter half of 2016, a Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta('Informant')  filed an Information before the Commission  on behalf of 'Fight for Transparency Society'. The Informant alleged two separate contraventions under Section 4 of the Act. The first allegation was in relation to the post-acquisition change of WhatsApp's Privacy Policy on 25.08.2016 under which WhatsApp subscribers were to share their account details and other similar information with Facebook. The second allegation was that by becoming a free application ('app') since January 2016, WhatsApp had engaged in predatory pricing. The Informant had also alleged violations of privacy rights and the violations of provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2002 although the same were dismissed by the Commission as subject matters falling outside the purview of the Act and also because the allegations had in any case been considered by the Delhi High Court in Karmanya Singh Sarren and Other v. Union of India [W.P.(C) 7663/2016] the decision in which is currently pending in appeal before the Supreme Court.

The Commission defined the relevant market as 'the market for instant messaging services using consumer communication apps through smart phones'.  The definition adopted by the Commission is also almost identical to the narrow market definition adopted by the European Commission ('EC') its decision approving the Facebook's acquisition of WhatsApp (Approval Decision').1 However, it maybe pertinent to note that EC undertook its ultimate market analysis in three further narrower markets located within the aforesaid market definition i.e. market for consumer communication services, Social Networking Services and Online Advertising Services. These three distinct markets however were not recognized by the Commission in its Order.   

The Commission, based on the data presented by the Informant, accepted the dominant position held by WhatsApp. In this regard the Order specifically noted that 96% of the smart phone devices in India had WhastApp installed on them and that 51% and 56% of internet users in India where active on WhatsApp and Facebook respectively, everyday.

The Commission next considered the allegation pertaining to changes of the privacy policy of WhatsApp. According to the policy update on 25.08.2016 the account details of the WhatsApp subscribers, including their phone numbers were to be matched with their corresponding Facebook Accounts. Before turning to the Commission's consideration of this allegation, a brief reference maybe be had to facts that lay ground to the Informant's allegation. WhatsApp had initially been a paid service where after a free trial of 1 year, a subscriber had to pay an annual subscription fee of US $ 0.99. WhatsApp revenue was primarily dependent on such subscription fee. This revenue model is of significance as it allowed WhatsApp to provide a significantly differentiated user experience because of a "no-ads" product strategy and also freeing it from vested commercial interest in the personal data of its subscribers or the data pertaining to their activity on the app. This was unlike other free communication apps (including Facebook's Messenger) whose revenue is dependent on advertisement revenues and revenue derived from selling subscriber's data to third parties. The two revenue modes also present a clash on issue of privacy rights.

Consequently, when Facebook announced its acquisition of WhatsApp, there was immense speculation that Facebook would also be commercially exploiting the data associated with the accounts of WhatsApp's subscribers. During the EU investigation on the proposed acquisition, third parties had submitted that some form of integration of the subscribers of Facebook and WhatsApp was likely to follow the acquisition. Facebook, however, denied such a possibility on three broad grounds. Firstly, that technically, the integration of the WhatsApp profiles and Facebook profiles will not be possible. Secondly, if users are manually required to initiate the integration, the move will receive 'significant backlash' from subscribers of Facebook as well as WhatsApp. Thirdly, cross-application use by users of the two applications will be difficult as the architecture of the apps are significantly different. These submissions were prima facie accepted by the European Commission in Approval Decision.2 Most importantly, it appears from the Approval Decision that the European Commission was of the view that in any case, if privacy protections available on WhatsApp are diluted by Facebook, it would trigger a considerable switch of customers to other communication App and therefore Facebook would be averse to such a commercial risk3. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission had also notified Facebook and WhatsApp against failing to keep privacy promises made to its respective subscribers post the acquisition and that any change in privacy policy would require an 'affirmative' change from subscribers.4 In all it would be reasonable to state that at the time of acquisition of WhatsApp, Facebook and WhatsApp had created a strong perception that privacy policy of WhatsApp would not be disrupted by the acquisition.

Contrary, to this perception, on 25.08.2016, WhatsApp, brought about sweeping changes to its privacy policy5. Under the updated terms of the privacy policy, phone numbers connected the WhatsApp's accounts were shared with Facebook's systems. A consumer was simply asked to agree to the update policy by clicking on 'Agree' icon. A much smaller 'Read more' option would have taken the user to a more detailed statement of the privacy policy in which a box against 'Share my WhatsApp account information with Facebook...' had to be located and unchecked to prevent the sharing of account details with Facebook. An alternative, opt-out option was provided to users to restrict the sharing of information with Facebook by altering their account details within thirty days of agreeing to the updated policy. The policy update. Following the policy update, on 18.05.2017, the European Commission slapped a fine of € 110 Million on Facebook for misleading it during the investigation leading to the Approval Decision as it was held that during the 2014 investigation the staff at Facebook was aware of possibility that WhatsApp and Facebook accounts would be matched in an automated manner6.

In March 2014, the German competition authority had initiated a probe against Facebook's suspected abuse of market power vis-a-vis the data of its subscribers. Following the policy update, in September 2016, Germany also imposed a ban on transfer of data between WhatsApp and Facebook7. Last month the Italian Competition regulator also imposed a fine of €3 miillion on WhatsApp for the u-turn on its privacy policy and 'inducing' its subscribers for sharing their data with Facebook 8. Further, several other proceedings were instituted by EU's data regulators against Facebook and WhatsApp for violation of data protection laws.

It was against this background that the Commission was considering the Informant's case. The Commission dismissed the allegation by accepting three principal submissions made by WhatsApp. Firstly, that subscribers were given an 'opt out' option to restrict the sharing of their information with Facebook. Secondly, that intent of sharing information with the Facebook family of companies was to improve the architecture of WhatsApp and Facebook so as to increase efficiency and safety. And that due to the end-to-end encryption of data on WhatsApp, content shared over WhatsApp is protected and cannot be accessed by a third party. The author is of the view that the submissions admitted by the Commission as a defence to the allegation circumvents the allegation rather than counter it. It is submitted that WhatsApp's u-turn on privacy policy appears to have been implemented with some impunity which in itself may, prima facie, be indicative of its market power. The allegation was not merely regarding protection of the data shared over WhatsApp but whether while agreeing to subject one self to the updated policy, the subscriber was given an opportunity to make an informed choice. 

In recent times authorities have merely considered privacy concerns as non-price factors in competition assessments.9 This is mainly because data in the hands of individual user is never assigned a monetary value but is seen in isolation within the privacy discourse. This, however, is the age of big data where an individual's phone numbers and their connections on a social platform are not merely a subject matter of privacy but a 'commodity' that is bought and sold and serves as currency in the digital market. Viewed from this perspective, where an admittedly dominant players fails to provide sufficient opportunity and knowledge to its input suppliers (i.e. subscriber with their personal data), it may amount to a violation under Section 42(a), Section 4(2)(d) and Section 2(2)(e) of the Act.

With regard to the allegation of predatory pricing, the Commission dismissed the same claiming that that there were several other apps such as Hike, Messenger and Viber that are also available for free and that not charging any fee for subscription fee was a standard industry practice in the relevant market. To further justify its decision the Commission also considered the 'switching cost' in the relevant market. The Commission held that since most of the other communication apps were low cost/free, easily downloadable, capable of co-existing on the same device, had  functionally simple interfaces, and there was enough information available about new apps on app stores, the switching costs for a consumer in the relevant market was insignificant.

This analysis is problematic for two reasons. Firstly, it is oddly and tediously entwined with the issue of predatory pricing while it could have more appropriately been a component of the Commission's  assessment on dominance. Further, ease of switching could also make predatory pricing a much more aggressive anti-competitive tool. Secondly, the switching cost assessment undertaken by Commission is potentially deceptive as it is more suited for the analysis of traditional goods and services rather than internet based, data-intensive service. For example the Commission has not taken into consideration the 'network effect' i.e. just like traditional telecom services, communication and social network  platforms also become more valuable as more and more subscribers use it. As had been recorded in the Order itself 96% percent of the smartphones in India have WhatsApp installed on them and 56% users are active on WhatsApp everyday. These figures are significant enough to suggest that consumers are unlikely to leave the app when more that half of their acquaintances are likely to be available on that platform. Further with volume of multimedia content and messages being shared through the app, shifting to another app may entail the cost/effort of data migration which will further have 'lock-in' effect on a subscriber, especially when the app itself is free further disincentivizing a shift10. Infact these two considerations received substantial considered by the European Commission and although it did not see competition being distorted in the post-acquisition market, that conclusion was drawn on market studies conducted within the European Commission and results of which may be drastically different in India.

The ultimate decision reached by the Commission may not have changed had it considered the factors discussed above, but to inspire confidence that the Commission is well equipped to assess cases of dominance in today's digital economy, efforts should be made to look at such cases in a much more nuanced manner so as to capture the on-going concerns about digital monopolies that are readily being treated as standards of competition assessments in other jurisdictions. Though the Commission decided not to subject the Facebook's conduct to a competition assessment, the current appeal before Supreme Court where the changes in the Privacy policy of WhatsApp is currently under challenge, the dominant position of Facebook and WhatsApp is most likely to be considered and it will be interesting to note the position the Hon'ble Court takes on this controversy.11


1 Case No. Comp/M7217, decision dated 3.10.2014 ('Acquisition Approval')

2 Approval Decisions- See paragraphs 137 and 138 and paragraphs 184 to 186 of the decision.

3 Approval Decision- Para 174

4 FTC, Press Release 'FTC Notifies Facebook, WhatsApp of Privacy Obligations in Light of Proposed Acquisition' dated 10.04.2014, available at

5 See: WhatsApp Blog, 'Looking ahead for WhatsApp' dated 26.08.2016,  available at: ;

6   European Commission – Press Release 'Mergers: Commission fines Facebook €110 million for providing misleading information about WhatsApp takeover' dated 18.05.2017, available at

7 See: IANS, 'Ban on WhatsApp data transfer to Facebook to stay: German court', Business Standard, dated 27.04.2017, available at :   ; Karin Matussek , 'WhatsApp sued by German Consumer Group Data Policy', Bloomberg, dated 30.01.2017, available at

8 Nick Fildes & James Politi 'WhatsApp fined €3m over Facebook data sharing in Italy', Financial Times , dated 13.05.2017

9   Edith Ramirez, FTC Chairwoman, 'Deconstructing the Antitrust Implications of Big Data', Keynote Remarks at the 43rd Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy Fordham Competition Law Institute New York. dated 22.10.2016, available at :

10 Approval Decision , para 114.

11 Karmanya Singh Sareen v. Union of India [SLP(C) No. 000804 / 2017]  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Modhulika Bose
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.