India: Divisional Patent Practice Revisited.

Last Updated: 7 June 2017
Article by DPS Parmar

The provision of divisional application derives its nexus from the concept of 'Unity of Invention' which is an administrative requirement present in various forms in the Patent Laws of Countries around the world. The formal requirement restricts the applicant from claiming more than one invention in a single application.

Initially, the Patents and Designs Act, 1911 did not provided any opportunity to the applicant to protect its multiple inventions disclosed in one patent application by way of divisional application, rather the controller had the power to refuse the patent application on the basis of multiplicity of invention or may direct the applicant to straightaway delete the additional inventions from the application. For the first time in the Indian patent history the mechanism of filing divisional application for the protection of multiple inventions disclosed in single patent application, was introduced by Patents and Designs (Amendment) Act, 1930.

Though, the provisions of divisional application was introduced way back in 1930 but still Indian patent office lack clarity when it comes to differentiating between applications to allow or deny divisional.

The question which needs to be given a wider prospective by the IPO is whether the inventor should get a second chance to add new claims to already disclosed invention? Is the process of so called "after claiming" is legal in view of public interest prospective? Do divisional applications meet the objective to produce manifold patents with an attempt to build a strong portfolio? What should be the criteria of legitimate division of an application?

IPAB rulings on divisional applications

If we see IPAB rulings in LG Electronics Inc v Controller of Patents & Designs (OA/6/2010/PT/KOL), Bayer Animal Health GmbH v Union of India (OA/18/2009/PT/DEL) and Syngenta Participations AG v Union of India (OA/17/2009/PT/DEL), the issues raised and resolved by IPAB in these cases were peculiar to the switching over from process patent regime to the product patent in 2005.The voluntary division of the application in these cases in fact, was an attempt to rewind the examination clock to hoodwink the earlier objections on non- patentability of product patent. This situation no longer exists now. Most of the mail box applications or other applications filed between 1995 and 2005 would have been examined and disposed. With fear of submarine patents like 'Hyatt shock' to computer industry giants relating to 'microcontroller' or 'liquid crystal displays' or Lemeision's 'submarine patent salvos' on "machine vision" patents (Barcode readers) by use of Byzantine tactics to exploit loopholes of the patent system, being a remote possibility, a re-look to the exiting practice of IPO in relation to suo moto division of patent application is required.

IPAB Ruling on Suo moto division

If we see the later decisions of IPAB we find further clarity in relation to filing of suo moto divisional application particularly in Milliken & Company v Union of India (OA/61/2012/PT/MUM). In this case it was held that the applicant's second divisional application, which was filed voluntarily without receiving an objection on lack of unity in the first divisional application, was valid. In this case applicant's request for voluntary amendment of claims for adding new set of claims during prosecution of the first divisional application was disallowed. IPAB held that in the absence of any other efficacious remedy to pursue the scope of the disallowed claims filing of the second divisional application is valid. It is clearly an indication towards suo moto division of an application to allow filing of further application with new set of claims.

The IPAB upheld the validity of the voluntary second divisional application, without looking into presence of multiple inventions.

'After Claiming'

The 'after claiming' in Milliken ruling of IPAB ,though raised many eyebrows on the issue of uncertainty but same can be answered by mandatory early publication of the new set of claims and subjecting these claims to the public scrutiny of pre-grant representation. The new set of claims may or may not have adversely affected the public. But this potential danger would be eliminated as every divisional application is treated as substantive application and it is governed by the requirement of mandatory publication. Rule 24 B (iv) provides a time limit for making request for examination of further applications filed under Section 16

(iv) The request for examination of application as filed according to the 'Explanation' under sub-section (3) of section 16 shall be made within forty-eight months from the date of filing of the application or from the date of priority of the first mentioned application or within six months from the date of filing of the further application, whichever is later;

Further as per the proviso to Rule 24 B (2)(i) as amended on 16.05.2016 not only early publication but also out of turn examination is envisaged in respect further application filed under section 16.The proviso reads as

"Provided that in case of a further application filed under section 16, the order of reference of such further application shall be the same as that of the first mentioned application:

Provided further that in case the first mentioned application has already been referred for examination, the further application shall have to be accompanied by a request for examination, and such further application shall be published within one month and be referred to the examiner within one month from the date of such publication.";

These changes in the rules are step forward in treating the further applications (divisional applications) distinct from other substantive applications. Having said so, such changes are merely facilitating the examination process. It in no way provide for special treatment to further applications.

Ex post addition of claims

The premise that an applicant is voluntarily filing a divisional application for the sole purpose of adding new set of claims when such an amendment in the parent application was disallowed raised no eyebrows in respect of IPAB ruling in Milliken. Rather, it is seen as opportunity to include additional matter. But one should not forget in US multiple applications (Continuation in part) are filed to bring the best claims to reap the maximum benefit of the invention in shortened term of 20 years. Without going much into these details let us see how this worked in US. The systematic filing of a succession of continuation applications can delay the prosecution of the patent application by number of years and during this prosecution delay new set of claims are added. The later granted patents in fact were modified to match the standards, the technology has established by then. These modified continuation application were also filed as PCT applications thus covering the protection worldwide.

Practice of after claiming rule

Filing of patent of addition does have certain issues relating additional claims when we see how this actually works in practice during infringement proceedings. 'After claiming' raises two major issues. Firstly it allows the patentees to cover more than what they actually invented. Secondly it subject unwary competitor to goal post shifting effect of claims to know the true scope of a patent. If we see the windfall to the inventor and transaction cost to the competitor we will see that it goes against public policy of fair and just reward to the inventor.

Hyatt and Lemelson submarine salvos

Some expert feel this is an attempt to shock the industry and reap the benefit when such a patent is granted later. Hyatt's 'submarine patents were such examples of how he manipulated the patent system to keep his patent pending till the computer industry was hot to strike. No doubt he made more than $150 million from license deal of 23 patents including microcontroller patent with Royal Philips NV. Hyatt microcontroller patent was later invalidated but by that time substantial royalties were received by him. Similarly Lemelson collected over $1.3 billion in royalties for his bar code technology patents before it was found invalid under the doctrine of laches in 2005 citing 'unreasonable long .... delay in prosecution' and ruling this patent 'prejudice to the public as whole.'

Disclosure - Dedication rule

Generally the patent specification disclosure forecloses addition of further claims during prosecution stage except by way of modifications in the already filed claims. If the applicant failed to claim certain subject matter disclosed in the specification he will be bared as it will be 'deemed to be dedicated to the public'. Applicability of this rule is not absolute. if we see Pfizer Inc Vs Teva Pharmaceuticals, case apart from other aspects, the Federal Circuit made a notable clarification relating to dedication of subject matter to the public for the purposes of the doctrine of equivalents. The Federal Circuit clarified that

"the public notice function of patents suggests that before unclaimed subject matter is deemed to have been dedicated to the public, that unclaimed subject matter must have been identified by the patentee as an alternative to a claim limitation."

Avoiding 'disclosure dedication rule'

In Indian patent practice there are no such precedence. The applicants can avoid the application of 'disclosure dedication rule' to the subject matter disclosed, but not claimed in the application if he is vigilant to protect the unclaimed subject matter. He has two options

1. Filing a co-pending application during prosecution

An applicant can claim the subject matter in a co-pending application before the patent issues by filing a divisional application. In India such applications are subjected to the scrutiny under section 16. Recent Milliken ruling of IPAB clearly gives such an indication towards suo moto division of an application into further application with new set of claims.

2. Filing a patent of addition

Second option with the applicant is to seek patent of addition under section 55 which is available to him any time after the grant of patent. This option does allow some leverage to the patentee to cover the minor improvement but he has to wait till the parent patent is granted.

Conclusion

Considering the need for allowing the patentee to cover the unclaimed subject, suo moto filing of divisional application is the better option. The inventor should get a second chance to add new claims to already disclosed invention though filing of divisional application subjected to all safeguards available to public. Moreover, some room for correcting claims should be made to avoid over-deterring claim drafting mistakes by the inventor or his attorney.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions