India: CRI Guidelines - II

Last Updated: 23 May 2017
Article by Gaurav Arora

This article is a follow up to my article: 'Need Soft Patents for Software Inventions'; in fact, it is one in the series analysing the patentability of 'computer related inventions.'

Although the first article praised the IPO for naming the guidelines aptly – Computer Related Inventions guidelines and not software inventions, it is with disappointment that I have to say that the guidelines fail to add 'something more' to clarify the stand of the patent office with respect to computer related inventions.

Let me start with guidelines on the inventive step determination at section 4.2.

4.2 Inventive Step

'the inventive step must be a feature which is not an excluded subject itself'... pg 9; para 2

Excluded subject: Some subjects have been excluded under section 3. Specifically, section 3 (k) excludes computer programme as such (emphasis added; dictionary meaning of per se) from the purview of definition of inventions. Although the statement above is a verbatim quote from the IPAB judgment on yahoo v. rediffmail, but it seems totally out of context here and has now been made a part of the much awaited general guidelines on patentability of CRI.

This interpretation seems to envisage that the term invention in the preamble of section 3 means an 'inventive step' and that it is the inventive step which should not fall in the excluded categories enlisted in sub clauses of section 3. This is against the rules of interpretation of statutes. This is completely against the simple interpretation that the section is capable of being given. The meaning of the term in a section should be consistent throughout. For example, if we read preamble to section 3 with clause (a), it is not intended that the inventive step not be frivolous but the invention as a whole should not be frivolous. It seems contrary to the statue if we separate the inventive step out of the invention and use section 3 exclusion to exclude the inventions.

Under the same section, at pg 11, second para of the guidelines:

"Accordingly the following points need to be objectively judged to ascertain whether the invention does have inventive step or not:

4.2.1 Identify the "person skilled in the art", i.e competent craftsman or engineer as distinguished from a mere artisan'

4.2.2 Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person at the priority date" (sic)

  • It has been long understood that the person skilled in the art in step 4.2.1 is defined and identified by the knowledge that he must possess. It is the knowledge that that person is required to possess that defines the person skilled in the art. In almost all analysis, person skilled in the art is a hypothetical person who is a manifestation of all the knowledge available on the priority date relevant to the technology of the invention.
  • Consider a situation where a carpenter accidentally discovers that the blade of his saw performs better upon heat treatment. Person skilled in the art in this case is an imaginary person who is assumed to know all about:

    • tools used in carpentry and the way they are used,
    • the various types of woods and the structure of fiber within,
    • metallurgy including heat treatment processes,
    • chemistry including iron carbon diagrams,
  • Such person skilled in the art may not physically and actually exist but a hypothetical person is assumed to exist which is a manifestation of all the existent knowledge relevant to the invention. He is an imaginary entity to whom all the knowledge is attributed.

    Now since it is the knowledge only which is used to define and identify the person skilled in the art, it is difficult to understand that how once that person is defined and identified what more knowledge is to be identified which he possesses as relevant common general knowledge.
  • In any case, even if we identify the relevant common general knowledge of the skilled person at the priority date, the identified common general knowledge is kept hanging like a claim element which is not connected to any other element in the claim. This common general knowledge once identified has not been referred to anywhere else in the subsequent steps. The next mention of the common general knowledge is with reference to industrial applicability in the next section, Section 4.3. This step seems redundant at best.

4.2.3 Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that cannot readily be done, construe it

  • The preamble to this stepwise approach is:

    'Accordingly the following points need to be objectively judged to ascertain whether the invention does have inventive step or not'

    The sub step 4.2.3 read together with the preamble leads to what may be seen as circular definition. As a sub-step of the method of judging whether the invention has an inventive step or not, what is required to be performed is to identify or construe the inventive concept. Needless to say, if we are able to identify the inventive concept/step/element, it has to be present. The thing whose presence is to be ascertained has to be identified first. Perhaps, the guidelines should use a different term here. This becomes all the more important when the whole purpose of the guidelines is to add clarity and remove/reduce confusion.
  • Perhaps, by inventive concept in sub step 3, what is meant is the alleged inventive concept. But this is still in contradiction to judging the invention as a whole, which is found in the guidelines at more than one place:

    • Section 4.5 3rd para:

      What is important is to judge the substance of claims taking whole of the claims together.

      However, if in substance, the claims, taken as whole, do not fall in any of the excluded categories, the patent should not be denied.
    • Section 4.5.2 1st para:

      the claims shall be examined as a whole.

4.2.4 Identify what, if any, differences exist between the matter cited as forming part of the "state of the art" and the inventive concept of the claim or the claim as construed

That is, identify the difference between state of the art and alleged inventive concept.

  • The procedure here totally moves away from the 'invention as a whole' concept and lays down that after identifying the alleged inventive step, the difference between the inventive step and state of the art be identified.
  • Again, the difference is to be identified between the prior art and the alleged inventive concept only.
  • Strangely, this step has been qualified with the expression, 'if any.' It is difficult to imagine an invention (which has passed the foremost test of novelty and has an alleged inventive step) not to have any differences between the prior art and its identified alleged inventive concept. The guidelines again confuse more than clarify.

4.2.5 Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of inventive ingenuity?

  • Without knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed

    Now the whole concept as claimed in the invention is to be removed from the knowledge of the skilled person identified above. Here again, the system/procedure moves back to the concept of invention as a whole, which now needs to be subtracted from the knowledge of the skilled person.
  • Do those differences constitute steps'

    That is, the differences identified in step 4.2.4 have to be broken down in to steps. And then the vicious questions to be asked is, '... which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art...' This is again circular reasoning/definition. Obviousness is same as lack of inventive step. To ascertain the presence of inventive step which is the whole purpose of this stepwise approach, what is to be required is to determine whether those differences identified are obvious to a person skilled in the art.

The test above seems to read on to what was laid down by the Supreme Court in Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metals as:

"Another test of whether a document is a publication which would negative existence of novelty or an "inventive step"..."

There are two important points here. First, the Supreme court while laying down this test was specifically referring to a document which has been published, i.e., a single document. This is a case when a single document is cited for obviousness and does not have all the features/elements of the claimed invention. It is a test to determine whether the element/feature claimed in the invention, which is missing from the prior art document can be assumed to be inherent/implicit in the document or a judicial notice of the same can be taken based upon the common general knowledge of the person skilled in the art.

Second, the operative word is, 'another.' So what was laid down by the SC as another test in case of a single published document to determine obviousness, has been generalised and rephrased in the guidelines. This test has been laid down as another test to the test in Rado v. John Tye:

"Whether the alleged discovery lies so much out of the Track of what was known before as not naturally to suggest itself to a person thinking on the subject, it must not be the obvious or natural suggestion of what was previously known."

Following seems to be more appropriate a thought, I would leave you with:

'Whether an alleged invention involves novelty and an 'inventive step', is a mixed question of law and fact, depending largely on the circumstances of the case. Although no absolute test uniformly applicable in all circumstances can be devised, certain broad criteria can be indicated.'

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Gaurav Arora
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.