India: Property Dues Relating To Liquidation Period To Be Discharged By Liquidator Or Auction Purchaser Dispute Regarding Onus


There is immense litigation initiated by auction purchasers, who are fastened with liability relating to outstanding dues of the Company in liquidation, in respect of the property / asset being put to auction by the Official Liquidator. These outstanding dues essentially relate to the period when sale in respect of the subject property is not even confirmed in favour of such auction purchasers. Typically, the liability is contested based on the interpretation of the terms of the 'Notice For Sale' issued by the Official Liquidator and the Order of the concerned High Court (Company Court) confirming the sale in favour of the auction purchaser.


The present article seeks to analyse the liability issues concerning sale of assets of companies in liquidation by the Official Liquidator and the onus to discharge the outstanding liability relating to the said assets pertaining to the pre-sale confirmation period (post liquidation liability). While it is reasonable to presume that such pre-transfer liability should be borne by the Official Liquidator (being the legal custodian of the company in liquidation), there is a practice of requiring the auction purchasers to discharge the liability once the sale is confirmed in their favour.

Procedure For Sale Of Assets Adopted By Official Liquidator

Post admission of a winding up petition filed at the behest of a creditor or a contributory1, an Official Liquidator is appointed as the legal custodian of the company, who steps into the shoes of the company and takes charge of its assets and other statutory records. In terms of the liquidation process contemplated under the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act")2, the Official Liquidator procures preparation of a schedule of assets of the company and puts the assets for auction/ sale.

The Official Liquidator thereafter prepares a Notice For Sale, detailing the terms and conditions governing the process of auction of the concerned asset/ property of the company. The said notice is typically published in two of the national dailies thereby putting the public at large to notice of the terms of sale. Official Liquidator is also authorized to prescribe the reserve price of the property and the amount of earnest money to be deposited upon consultation with the 'Assets Sale Committee' and thereafter conduct the auction process to derive/ obtain the best price for the asset/property.

The eligible bidders, who qualify as per the Notice For Sale are invited to participate in the auction process. The auction is conducted by the Official Liquidator and the sale is confirmed in favour of the highest bidder. Upon conclusion of the auction proceedings, which are recorded formally by the Official Liquidator in a Report, the successful bidder deposits the sale consideration with the Official Liquidator, who places the said Report before the concerned Company Court to obtain a formal order confirming the sale. The Company Court upon considering the contents of the Report and after adjudicating any objections that may be raised by the other bidders, confirms the sale in favour of the highest bidder. The auction proceeds are then utilized by the Official Liquidator for payment of outstanding dues of the company and dues of the creditors (both secured and unsecured) in terms of the priority prescribed under the Act. Typically, the order of the [Company Court] confirming the sale provides that the successful bidder shall be liable to discharge the dues relating to the said property from the date of such confirmation.


There are large number of cases where the municipal authorities / local authorities insist upon payment of the outstanding dues by the auction purchasers, failing which the legitimate rights of such auction purchasers are delayed on grounds of such non-payment. Usually the auction purchaser is apprised of such liability only when it approaches the corporation / authority for mutation of records, alteration of entry in register of rights etc., which is made subject to payment of such outstanding dues. Legally the said liability is to be discharged by the Official Liquidator out of the sale proceeds deposited by the auction purchaser, however, there is no attempt made by the authorities to realise the said dues from the Official Liquidator.

While the auction purchasers contest that their liability to discharge the dues relating to the property being put to auction accrues only from the date when the sale is confirmed, corporations / authorities premise their claim on the basis that the auction purchaser is liable to discharge the said liability as the property is typically sold on 'as is where is basis'.

Aforesaid Practise Is Contrary To Law

The demand raised by the corporations / authorities is bad in law on account of the following:

  1. Since the Official Liquidator is the legal custodian of the assets / properties of the Company during the pre-sale confirmation period, it is the [duty] of the Official Liquidator to discharge any dues relating to the Company which became due during the said period. It is a settled law that post admission of a winding up petition, the Official Liquidator steps into the shoes of the Company and is therefore required to discharge the liabilities of the Company as they would have been discharged by the Company itself had it been in active operation;
  2. The dues relating to the property are either to be borne by the owner of the property or in certain given cases by the person, who was in possession of the said property during the period with which the dues relate. Clearly the bonafide auction purchaser cannot be fastened with the liability relating to the pre-sale confirmation period as during the said period the auction purchaser was neither the owner of the property nor was he in possession thereof, which is only handed over upon post confirmation of sale by the concerned Company Court and post registration of sale deed3;
  3. It is a settled law that an auction purchaser cannot be expected to verify from all and sundry local authorities regarding the dues relating to the Company before participating in the auction, which is typically conducted based on the terms of the Notice For Sale. In any event, the Official Liquidator, being the legal custodian of the property and being in-charge and in possession of the statutory records and the books of the Company, is better suited to make such enquiry relating to the outstanding dues, as opposed to the auction purchaser. In the absence of knowledge regarding the existence of such outstanding dues, the auction purchaser cannot be expected to discharge them particularly when it has already paid the sale consideration amount and considering such dues relate to the pre-sale confirmation period;
  4. The Official Liquidator having actual / deemed knowledge of the existence of outstanding dues should either disclose the same upfront, expressly as a term of the Notice For Sale or should bear the liability. Clearly, if the Notice For Sale is silent4, then the bonafide auction purchaser should not be made liable to discharge the said dues on a twisted interpretation of clauses like "property is being sold on as is where is basis" and "caveat emptor". There are judicial pronouncements5 to suggest that such clauses can at best be interpreted to refer to the quality and condition of the assets being put to auction and not remote outstanding dues, which were never brought to the notice of the bonafide auction purchasers;
  5. The sale is confirmed in favour of the auction purchaser upon payment of the sale consideration which is deposited with the Official Liquidator, who initiates and conducts the process of sale. The outstanding dues relating to the property of the Company in liquidation should therefore be required to be paid by the Official Liquidator out of the sale proceeds6;
  6. The Official Liquidator has access to the records of the Company and has the resources to verify the existence of the actual outstanding dues. The Official Liquidator also has the benefit of assessing / fixing the reserve price, with the aid and assistance of the Assets Sale Committee. The Official Liquidator supervises, controls and concludes the auction process. Having regard to the above, the Official Liquidator is relatively in a better position to assess what is the best price for the property and when the auction procedure is actually to be concluded. The Official Liquidator therefore has the discretion to re-conduct / continue with the auction purchase till he is satisfied that the price obtained is adequate to satisfy the outstanding dues of the Company, rather than fastening the said dues on the bonafide auction purchaser;
  7. Even under Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, it is the liability of the seller to discharge all public charges /rent/ dues/ encumbrances relating to the property being put to auction up to the date of the sale. The buyer accordingly is required to discharge the said dues only from the date of the sale. Admittedly, for companies in liquidation, the Official Liquidator, being the legal custodian is the seller of the property and therefore, is required to discharge the said dues relating to the property till the date of the sale and the liability of outstanding dues should not be fastened to a bonafide auction purchaser, who had no relation whatsoever with the property prior to the date of confirmation of sale;
  8. Making the legal right of the auction purchaser to have the property mutated in its name, subject to payment of outstanding dues relating to the pre-sale confirmation period, is totally contrary to the settled law that the mutation proceedings cannot be stalled and made subject to alleged dispute relating to liability to pay outstanding dues.7


There is sufficient material to suggest that the corporations / authorities have no sustainable legal basis to insist that the outstanding liability relating to the property being put to auction, essentially pertaining to the pre-sale confirmation period, should be discharged by the auction purchasers. Instead there are cogent grounds and valid reasons to indicate that such dues relating to the pre-sale confirmation period should be discharged by the Official Liquidator, who is admittedly the legal custodian of the assets / properties of the Company. Despite the above, it appears that the corporations / authorities do not pursue the Official Liquidator for payment of such dues and instead choose to fasten the said liability on the auction purchasers. This stance is ex facie illegal and amounts to unnecessarily arm twisting the auction purchasers, whose valid and justifiable rights are made subject to payment of the said outstanding dues. Consequently the auction purchasers are forced to take recourse to legal proceedings which consumes sufficient time and resource.


1. The jurisdiction earlier was with High Courts, however, with effect from 15 December 2016, winding up Petitions, in which service was not complete, have been transferred to National Company Law Tribunal, which now appoints an Insolvency Professional instead of Official Liquidator.

2. While the High Court under the 1956 Act had the power to appoint Official Liquidator, the said power under the Companies Act, 2013 now vests with National Company Law Tribunal, which appoints Insolvency Professionals to take charge of the assets and records of the Company.

3. Official Liquidator, High Court, Calcutta vs. Ujjain Nagar Palika Nigam, (2009) 2 Cal LJ 360 –Calcutta High Court held that the liability with respect to payment of property tax and water tax was a post-liquidation liability and was to be borne by the Official Liquidator in the absence of a clear provision in the sale notice. The High Court further held that the expression "as is where is whatever there is basis" does not comprise within its ambit the liability to clear statutory charges as might have accrued and are in arrears.

4. Gaurav Kanvarjuneja and Ors vs. Surat Municipal Corporation and Ors., 2016 SCC OnLine Guj 6140 –Gujarat High Court quashed and set aside the action of Surat Municipal Corporation recovering the property tax arrears for the properties purchased by petitioners in a Bank auction, without informing the petitioners that there is any property tax due for the properties/shops prior to the purchase.

5. AI Champdany Industries Ltd. vs. Official Liquidator, (2009) 4 SCC 486 - the Supreme Court in this judgment defined the term 'encumbrance' and held that property tax is not an encumbrance as it does not diminish the value of the property. Further it was also held that either the Companies Act or any other law does not impose any additional obligation upon the purchaser to make an enquiry with regard to the liabilities of the companies other than those which would impede their value.

6. AI Champdany Industries Ltd. vs. Official Liquidator, (2009) 4 SCC 486

7. Bijay Shankar Tripathi vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporation, AIR 1994 Cal 152

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions