India: Power Of Attorneys Executed Out Of India - Requirement Of Notarization & Evidentiary Value Before Courts Of India

Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate & Partner Vaish Associates Advocates
Email: vpdalmia@vaishlaw.com Mobile: 09810081079
&
Pavit Singh Katoch, Advocate & Principal Associate, Vaish Associates Advocates
Email: pavitsingh@vaishlaw.com Mobile: 09999970810

Under the Indian laws, any power of attorney executed outside India needs authentication, as it is a requirement that a power of attorney has to be executed in the presence of certain designated officers. So, any power of attorney executed outside India should be authenticated by a notary public of that country or the Indian consul.

The (Indian) Evidence Act and the Evidentiary Value of Notarization

Under Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act, the Court shall presume that every document purported to be Power of Attorney, which has been duly executed before and authenticated by Public Notary can be taken to have been so executed and authenticated. Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 which creates a presumption of authenticity in favor of a notarized power of attorney, reads as under:

"Section 85 - Presumption as to power-of-attorney

The Court shall presume that every document purporting to be a power-of-attorney, and to have been executed before, and authenticated by, a Notary Public, or any court, Judge, Magistrate, Indian Consul or Vice-Consul, or representative of the Central Government, was so executed and authenticated."

Section 57(6) of the Indian Evidence Act provides that the Court shall take judicial notice of all the seals of which English Courts take judicial notice and the seals of Notary Public, as under:

"57. Facts of which Court must take judicial notice

The Court shall take judicial notice of the following facts:-

..................

(6) All seals of which English Courts take judicial notice: the seals of all the 39[Courts in 40[India]] and of all Courts out of 40[India] established by the authority of 41[the Central Government or the Crown Representative]; the Seals of Courts of Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction and of Notaries Public, and all seals which any person is authorized to use by 42[the Constitution or an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom or an] Act or Regulation having the force of law in 40[India]

........."

Under Section 57 Sub-section (6) of the Evidence Act, the Courts have to take judicial notice of the seals of Notaries Public and when the seal is there, of which judicial notice is taken, there is no reason why judicial notice should not be taken of the signatures as well".

The decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Jugraj Singh and Anr. v. Jaswant Singh and Ors. [AIR 1971 SC 761] is a landmark judgment which has helped to clear the air surrounding the legal proposition about the presumption arising under Section 85 and relevant para of the judgment is reproduced as under:

7. ..........The second power of attorney however does show that it was executed before a proper Notary Public who complied with the laws of California and authenticated the document as required by that law. We are satisfied that that power of attorney was also duly authenticated in accordance with our laws. The only complaint was that the Notary Public did not say in his endorsement that Mr. Chawla had been identified to his satisfaction. But that flows from the fact that he endorsed on the" document that it had been subscribed and sworn before him. There is a presumption of regularity of official acts and we are satisfied that he must have satisfied himself in the discharge of his duties that the person who was executing it was the proper person. This makes the second power of attorney valid and effective both under Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 33 of the Indian Registration Act.

Notaries Act of 1952

As per the section 14 of the (Indian) Notaries Act of 1952, if the central government is satisfied that by law or practice of any country or place outside India, the notaries act done by notaries outside India, the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare the notarial acts lawfully done by notaries within such country or place shall be recognized within India for all purposes or, as the case may be, for such limited purposes as may be notified in the notification. The Section reads as under:

"Sec.14. Reciprocal arrangements for recognition of notarial acts done by foreign notaries.- If the Central Government is satisfied that by the law or practice of any country or place outside India, the notarial acts done by notaries within India are recognized for all or any limited purposes in that country or place, the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare that the notarial acts lawfully done by notaries within such country or place shall be recognized with India for all purposes or, as the case may be, for such limited purposes as may be specified in the notification."

There are few notification which have been issued by the Government of India for recognition of notarial acts done by foreign notaries of United Kingdom, Hungary, Belgium, New Zealand and Ireland (http://lawmin.nic.in/la/foreignnotaries.htm).

Accordingly, it has been a usual argument before courts that unless there is a notification in the Official Gazette for recognition of notarial acts done by a particular foreign notary, the court cannot presume the execution and authenticity of Power of Attorney notarized by a notary public of a foreign country. However, this argument cannot be accepted.

The factual situation is that section 85 of the Evidence Act creates a legal presumption in favor of execution and authentication of a document purporting to be a power of attorney executed before, or authenticated by, a Notary Public.

There are some judgments of different High Courts, which hold that Section 85 the Evidence Act, applies to powers of attorney executed before and authenticated by all Notaries and not necessarily only to Notaries defined under the Notaries Act, 1952. Delhi High Court in the case of National and Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. M/s. World Science News and others [MANU/DE/0106/1976; AIR 1976 Delhi 263], Allahabad High Court in the case of Abdul Jabbar v. IInd Addl. District Judge, Orai [MANU/UP/0256/1980; AIR 1980 Allahabad 369] and Calcutta High Court in the case of in Re K.K. Ray (Private) Pvt. Ltd. [MANU/WB/0150/1967; AIR 1967 Calcutta 636 (V 54 C 136)] have held so. Even the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Jugraj Singh v. Jaswant Singh [MANU/SC/0413/1970; 1970 (2) Supreme Court Cases 386] suggests that a power of attorney executed before a Notary Public not covered by the Notaries Act, 1952 comes within the expression "Notary Public" under Section 85.

Now the question is whether Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952, which is in the context of reciprocal arrangements for recognition of notarial acts done by foreign Notaries, in any way, controls the interpretation of Sections 85 or 57 of the Evidence Act.

Section 14 provides that if the Central Government is satisfied that by the law or practice of any country or place outside India, the notarial acts done by Notaries in India are recognized for all or any limited purposes in that country or place, the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare that the notarial acts lawfully done by the Notaries within that country or place shall be recognized within India for all purposes or, as the case may be, for such limited purposes, as may be specified in the notification. Section 14 no doubt provides for a declaration by the Central Government of recognition within India of all notarial acts done by Notaries of a foreign country but does it imply that no other notarial acts, that is to say, except the acts so recognized by declaration by the Central government, are recognized in India.

The Notaries Act, 1952 is subsequent to the Evidence Act, which was enacted in the year 1872. Further, the purpose of sections 57 and 85 is to reduce the recording of evidence. In the first place, Sections 85 and 57 particularly deal with powers of attorneys executed before and authenticated by Notaries Public which are presumed to have been duly so executed and authenticated, with the seals of the notaries being judicially noticed, whereas Section 14 provides for recognition of "notarial acts". There is no reason why, as far as powers of attorney with notarial seals are concerned, the courts should not go by the provisions of Sections 85 and 57, which particularly deal with such matters, rather than the general provisions of Section 14 which bear on recognition of notarial acts. (There are various other notarial acts which fall for recognition within India.) For raising the statutory presumption, Sections 85 and 57 do not require any recognition of notarial acts of the country or place, as the case may be, where such power of attorney is executed or authenticated. Secondly, there is nothing in the language of Section 14, which requires that only those notarial acts, which are declared as recognized by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette, are to be recognized in India. For such matters, like the due execution of Power-of-Attorney in the present day of international commerce, there is no reason to limit the word "Notary Public" in section 85 or section 57 to Notaries appointed in India. Section 14 does not, in any way, control the interpretation of Section 85 read with Section 57 of the Evidence Act.

The Delhi High Court in the case of Rajesh Wadhwa v. Dr. (Mrs.) Sushma Govil [MANU/DE/0335/1988; 37 (1989) DLT 88] has dealt with this aspect. The Court, after considering judgments of various courts in and outside India, came to hold that the provisions of Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952, do not create any bar in recognizing the notarial acts of such countries, which are not declared as recognized by a notification of the Central Government.

Even the Allahabad High Court in Abdul Jabbar's case (supra) held that Section 85 of the Evidence Act applies equally to documents authenticated by Notaries Public of other countries and there is no reason to import the provisions of Notaries Act for interpreting the provisions of the Evidence Act.

Another judgment of Delhi High Court in La Chemise Lacosle v. Crocodile Indl. Pte. Ltd. [CS (OS) No. 894/2001], holds that even though there might not be reciprocity between India and another country within the meaning of Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952, acts of Notaries in that foreign country could be given legal recognition by courts and authorities in India. The notification under Section 14 of the Notaries Act, in other words, is not held to be mandatory.

In the case of National and Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. M/s. World Science News and others [MANU/DE/0106/1976; AIR 1976 Delhi 263], the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held as:

"(10) The document in the present case is a power of attorney and again on the face of it shows to have been executed before, and authenticated by, a notary public. In view of Section 85 of the Evidence Act, the Court has to presume that it was so executed and authenticated. Once the original document is produced purporting to be a power of attorney so executed and attested, as stated in Section 85 of the Evidence Act, the Court has to presume that it was so executed and authenticated. The provision is mandatory, and it is open to the Court to presume that all the necessary requirements for the proper execution of the power of attorney have been duly fulfilled. There is no doubt that the section is not exhaustive and there are different legal modes of executing a power of attorney, but, once the power of attorney on its face shows to have been executed before, and authenticated by, a notary public, the Court has to so presume that it was so executed and authenticated. The authentication by a Notary Public of a document, purporting to be a power of attorney and to have been executed before him is to be treated as the equivalent of an affidavit of identity. The object of the section is to avoid the necessity of such affidavit of identity. Under Section 57 Sub-section (6) of the Evidence Act, the Courts have to taken judicial notice of the seals of Notaries Public and when the seal is there, of which judicial notice is taken, there is no reason why judicial notice should not be taken of the signatures as well".

In yet another case of Rajesh Wadhwa v. Sushma Govil MANU/DE/0335/1988 : AIR 1989 Delhi 144, the Delhi High Court took the view that even though there might not be reciprocity between India and another country, the notarial acts of Notary in the foreign country could be given legal recognition by the Court. The Court further held that Notification under Section 48 of The Notaries Act was held to be non-mandatory. The relevant para of the said judgment is reproduced as under:

"So, this Court has to independently consider whether in absence of any notification under Section 14 of the Notaries Act the power of attorneys endorsed by Notaries Public of USA are admissible in evidence or not Counsel for the Respondent has cited In re: K. K. Ray (Private) Limited.: MANU/WB/0150/1967 : AIR1967Cal636 In the cited case, an affidavit attested by Notary of New York (U.S.A.) was sought to be relied upon."

Even in the case of Zhejiang Medicines and Health Products Import and Export Co. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Devanshi Impex Pvt. Ltd. [MANU/MH/2737/2016], it was held by the Bombay High Court that as a matter of law that Section 14 of the Notaries Act, 1952 has no bearing on the construction to be put on Section 85 of the Evidence Act, in which case factual reciprocity of notarial acts is quite besides the point.

Also in the case of Rajeshwarhwa Vs. Sushma Govil [AIR 1989 Delhi 144], it was held that where a power of attorney duly authenticated by a Notary Public of a foreign company to institute a suit, it is presumed that the suit is instituted by the competent person on behalf of the company. It was also held that when a seal of the Notary is put on the document, Section 57 of the Evidence Act comes into play and a presumption can be raised regarding the genuineness of the seal of the said Notary, meaning thereby that the said document is presumed to have been attested by a competent Notary of that country.

It is held that in case of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation and Ors. Vs. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Decided On: 07.10.2015), that A perusal of Section 85 of the Evidence Act makes it clear that in case Power of Attorney has been executed and authenticated by a public notary, the Court has to presume that it was so executed, authenticated and attested. The provisions are mandatory and it is open to the Court to presume that all the necessary requirements for the proper execution of the Power of Attorney had been followed.

To conclude, it is clear that once the original document is produced purporting to be a power of attorney so executed and attested, as stated in Section 85 of the Evidence Act, the Court has to presume that it was so executed and authenticated. The provision is mandatory, and it is open to the Court to presume that all the necessary requirements for the proper execution of the power of attorney have been duly fulfilled.

Further, under Section 57 Sub-section (6) of the Evidence Act, the Courts have to take judicial notice of the seals of notaries public and when the seal is there, of which judicial notice is taken, there is no reason why judicial notice should not be taken of the signatures as well. Section 57 of the Indian Evidence Act which enjoins upon the Courts to take judicial notice of seals of a notary public, such judicial notice cannot be limited to notaries appointed in India only. It seems clear if the entire Sub-section is read. Once, this conclusion is reached, there is no reason to limit the meaning of the expression. "Notaries Public" in Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act to Notaries appointed in India only.

© 2016, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Vijay Pal Dalmia, Partner
Pavit Singh Katoch
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.