India: No Compensatory Tariff for GENCOs after Conclusion of PPA under Section 63, EA

Last Updated: 13 April 2017
Article by Divya Chaturvedi and Arunima Kedia

Most Read Contributor in India, August 2018

Factual Background

The Hon'ble Supreme Court by way of its judgment dated 11 April 2017 has set aside the common judgment dated 7 April 2016, rendered by Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) where APTEL had allowed the claims of Adani Power Ltd. (APL) and Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd. (CGPL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tata Power Ltd. to claim compensatory tariff in the wake of change in Indonesian Coal Regulations as 'Force majeure' event envisaged in the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). Change in Indonesian Coal Regulations had led to increase in cost of production of electricity as APL and CGPL were sourcing coal from Indonesia for producing and supplying to several State distribution companies.

The matter relates back to when APL and CGPL had filed the petitions before the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Central Commission) seeking compensatory tariff on account of the impact of change in Indonesian Coal Regulations with respect to their respective PPAs entered into with several State distribution companies under Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 (EA-2003) i.e. by succeeding in competitive bidding process. Central Commission, by its order dated 2 April 2013 had:-

  • Concluded that PPAs entered into by APL constituted a composite scheme for generation and sale of electricity as envisaged under Section 79(1)(b) of EA-2003 thereby holding that the Central Commission was the Appropriate Commission for redressal of disputes arising under the PPAs;
  • Held that claims of APL and CGPL on the grounds of force majeure and / or change in law were not admissible, but relief of compensatory tariff could be granted in exercise of the regulatory powers provided under Section 79 of EA-2003, considering the larger public interest. Accordingly, a Committee was constituted to look into the alleged difficulties faced by APL and CGPL and to find an acceptable solution thereto; and
  • Proceeded to grant compensatory tariff to APL and CGPL based on the Committee's report.

Several appeals and cross appeals were filed by the parties before APTEL and finally, APTEL, vide its common Judgement dated 7 April 2016:-

  • agreed with the Central Commission that generation and sale of power by APL to Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (GUVNL) and Haryana Utilities constituted a composite scheme within the meaning of Section 79(1)(b) of EA-2003 and therefore, the Central Commission would have jurisdiction to proceed further in the matter;
  • concluded, having regard to the law on frustration contained in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and the relevant provisions of the PPAs, that force majeure was made out on the facts of such cases and reversed the order of the Central Commission on this account;
  • also reversed the Central Commission's order on the issue of exercise of regulatory powers under Section 79, by holding that regulatory powers could not be exercised once there was a PPA executed under Section 63 of EA-2003;
  • held that change in law provisions did not apply to foreign law and, therefore, changes in Indonesian Coal Regulations did not come within the scope of the provisions of PPA; and
  • held that the Government Policies that were relied upon, did not constitute 'law' insofar as changes in Indian law were concerned.

Accordingly, the matter was remanded to the Central Commission to determine the impact of the force majeure event to grant compensatory tariff.  Upon appeals by Energy Watchdog, Prayas (Energy Group), Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd., Ajmer Vidyut Nigam Ltd., Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., GRIDCO Ltd. and CGPL, Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its Judgement dated 11 April 2017 has decided the issues as under:-

Composite Scheme

Upon reading various provisions of EA-2003, the Hon'ble Supreme Court took the view that the emergent scheme is that the Central Government / Central Commission is involved whenever there is inter-state supply of electricity whereas the State Government / State Commission is involved only in cases of intra-state generation or supply of electricity. Accordingly, the Central Commission would be the 'Appropriate Commission' in terms of provisions of EA-2003 in all cases wherein the generation and sale of power takes place in more than one state. In other words, such scheme for generation and sale of electricity in more than one State would constitute a 'composite scheme'. The Hon'ble Supreme Court further clarified that commonality and uniformity of tariff are not prerequisites for a 'composite scheme'.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court also relied upon the dictionary meaning of the term 'composite', which is defined as 'consisting of at least two elements' to hold in the present case that generation and sale being in more than one state, the same could be referred to as 'composite'.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court viewed the definition of 'composite scheme' in the National Tariff Policy (dated 6 June 2006 as amended on 28 January 2016) as an important aid to the construction of Section 79(1)(b).

It was noted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the non-obstante clause at the beginning of Section 64(5) of EA-2003 indicated that in all cases involving inter-State supply, transmission, or wheeling of electricity, the Central Commission would alone have jurisdiction. Thus, Section 64(5) would only apply if the jurisdiction otherwise being with the Central Commission alone, was bestowed upon the State Commission having jurisdiction in respect of the concerned licensee by application of the parties concerned.

Regulatory Power(s) of the Appropriate Commission

The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that it was clear from Section 63 of EA-2003 that the Appropriate Commission was not a "mere post-office" but that the tariff discovered through the process of bidding could be adopted only if such bidding was conducted in a transparent manner in accordance with the Guidelines issued thereunder.

Further, the view was taken that the regulatory powers of the Central Commission under Section 79(1) being general, the adoption of tariff under Section 63 could not be de hors Section 79(1)(b) of EA-2003. It was held that the non-obstante clause in Section 63 being limited to Section 62, the general powers of the Commission to "regulate" tariff under Section 79(1)(b) were not excluded.

Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court stated that once the PPA has been concluded after adoption of tariff by the Appropriate Commission in terms of Competitive Bidding Guidelines issued by Central Government under Section 63 of EA-2003, reliefs in exercise of its regulatory power could be granted only in terms of the provisions of PPA.

Change in Law

Change in foreign law

The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in agreement with APTEL, took the view that the term "all laws" provided in the PPAs would only include the laws of India, including electricity-related laws unless any specific reference to foreign laws has been made. In this context, the Hon'ble Supreme Court rejected the contention of the generators that in every other clause of the PPA, references had explicitly been made to 'Indian Law' and stated that as such it would be unsafe to rely upon such other clauses of the PPAs.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court further observed that the fact that coal was to be sourced from abroad would not indicate the inclusion of foreign laws under 'change in law' as the meaning of the clause could not be said to change based on the source of coal. Further, merely annexing the Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA) to the PPA did not render either the PPA or the FSA to be read and interpreted in each other's context.

Change in Coal Distribution Policy

It was held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the modification of the New Coal Distribution Policy, vide the letter dated 31 July 2013 issued by the Ministry of Power, Government of India did amount to a change in Indian law and would be covered by the 'change in law' clause in the PPAs. Thus, the generators could claim compensatory tariff to the limited extent of the impact of the change in the said Policy.

Force Majeure

The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that upon the promulgation of the Indonesian Coal Regulations, the generators merely had to pay a higher price to import coal from Indonesia. Thus, the doctrine of frustration as envisaged under Section 56 of EA-2003 would not apply as the fundamental basis of the PPAs remained unaltered.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court highlighted the fact that nowhere did the PPAs state that coal was to be procured only from Indonesia at a particular price. In fact, the price payable for the supply of coal was to be borne entirely by the generator and was a risk knowingly undertaken by the generator. The fact that a non-escalable tariff was quoted, is relevant to demonstrate that the generating company bears the risk of supplying electricity at the indicated tariff.

However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court clarified that the mere fact that the bid may be non-escalable does not mean that the generators were precluded from raising the plea of frustration, if the same was otherwise available in law.

While interpreting the terms of the PPAs, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the force majeure clause is not exhaustive but ought to be narrowly construed to indicate something that partly or wholly prevents performance of the contract. As alternative modes of performance were available to the generators, albeit at a higher price, the contract could not be said to be frustrated as the fundamental basis of the contract was not displaced.

Khaitan Comment

The judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is quite significant for bringing clarity to certain sectoral issues which have been raised and argued before various fora without any conclusion on correctness of the approach. It has now been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that only the Central Commission would have jurisdiction with regard to the generating companies supplying power to more than one State and the option of approaching the State Commission under Section 64(5) of EA-2003 would be available only if the relevant State distribution company along with the generating company made an application before the State Commission.

Further, it has been now settled that the scope for regulatory intervention is not available to the Appropriate Commission upon the execution of a PPA (including the adoption of tariff) pursuant to the bidding process under Section 63 of EA-2003 read with Competitive Bidding Guidelines issued by the Central Government thereunder; save and except in the manner provided for in such PPA.

While the Hon'ble Supreme Court's Judgment may cause short term distress to the generating companies but in the long run would reduce assumptions and make the bidders exercise caution prior to submitting their bids as it would not be open to subsequently seek relief de hors the provisions of the PPA. It will also introduce certainty into the bidding process by diminishing the regulatory information asymmetry.

The judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholds the sanctity of the bidding process under Section 63 of EA-2003 and allows the generating companies to seek compensatory reliefs on account of changes in Coal Distribution Policy as 'policy' has been held to be covered under the definition of 'Indian law' read with the 'Change in Law' clause of the PPA.

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at legalalerts@khaitanco.com

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions