India: Sanction For Prosecution Of Offences Under Chapter XII Of The (Indian) Income Tax Act-1961

Last Updated: 7 December 2016
Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Partner

Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court, Partner & Head of Intellectual Property Laws Division, Vaish Associates Advocates, India

Under Chapter XII of the (Indian) Income Tax Act-1961, a person cannot be prosecuted for an offence Under Sections 275A,  275B,  276,  276A,  276B,  276BB,  276C,  276CC,  276D, 277,  277A or 278, except with the previous sanction of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or Commissioner(Appeals) or the appropriate Authority. Accordingly, in all cases of prosecution the fact of proper sanction by a competent authority is sine qua non, for initiating  prosecution against an offender by the Income Tax Authorities. The issue of valid previous sanction becomes important, and may be taken as a defense by the accused during the course of trial. Following are the important points, which are to be considered, while granting sanction in any matter:

  • The authorized official or the competent authority shall be competent to grant the sanction within its territorial jurisdiction, otherwise the prosecution of the accused may stand vitiated.
  • The sanctioning authority shall also take into consideration all relevant facts and material available before it, so as to arrive at a judicious decision.
  • A sanction by a sanctioning authority shall also be based on a speaking order, and mere assertion that the sanctioning authority has seen the documents before it and applied its mind may not be sufficient to uphold the sanction.
  • The process of grant of sanction is not mechanical or a mere formality, as it is expected that the sanctioning authority will apply its mind before the grant of the sanction of prosecution.

It has been judicially well established that when any authority takes into consideration partly relevant and partly irrelevant facts and/ or does not take into consideration relevant facts, the entire conclusion is bound to be perverse and vitiated.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Municipal Committee vs. Punjab State Electricity Board [Ref.:  [2010] 13 SCC 216] explained what constitutes a 'perverse order' in the following terms:

"If a finding of fact is arrived at by:

  • ignoring or excluding relevant material, or
  • by taking into consideration irrelevant material, or
  • if the finding so outrageously defies logic as to suffer from the vice of irrationality incurring the blame of being perverse,

then the finding is rendered infirm in the eyes of law.

It is a well-established law that when power is given under the Statute to a specific authority to do certain thing in a certain manner, then such power can be exercised by such authority alone and none else. It is an established principle of law that such authority, unless permitted by the Statute, cannot delegate such power/ function to another authority [Ref.: Ramana Dayaram Shetty V. IAAI: [1979] 3 SCC 489].

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of A.K. Roy V. State of Punjab [Ref.: AIR 1986 SC 2160], observed as under:

"A careful analysis of the language of Section 20(1) of the Act clearly shows that it inhibits institution of prosecutions for an offence under the act except on fulfillment of one or the other of the two conditions.

  • Either the prosecutions must be instituted by the Central Government or the State Government or a person authorized in that behalf by the Central Government or the State Government, or
  • the prosecutions should be instituted with the written consent of any of the four specified categories of authorities or persons.

If either of these two conditions is satisfied, there would be sufficient authority for the institution of such a prosecution for an offence under the Act. Where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other modes of performance are necessarily forbidden.

The provision contained in Section 20(1) of the Act does not contemplate the institution of a prosecution by any person other than those designated. The terms of Section 20(1) do not envisage further delegation of powers by the person authorized, except that such prosecution may be instituted with the written consent of the Central Government or the State Government or the person authorized. The use of the negative words in Section 20(1) "No prosecution for an offence under this Act..... shall be instituted except by or with the written consent of" plainly make the requirements of the section imperative. That conclusion ours must necessarily of follow from the well-known rule of construction of inference to be drawn from the negative language used in a statute stated by Craies on Statute Law, 6th edn., p. 263 in his own terse language:

If the requirements of a statute which prescribe the manner in which something is to be done are expressed in negative language, that is to say, if the statute enacts that it shall be done in such a manner and in no other manner, it has been laid down that those requirements are in all cases absolute, and that neglect to attend to them will invalidate the whole proceedings."

This is a well settled law that penal/prosecution provisions are required to be strictly construed and nothing can be read/imported into the specific language of the provisions. Further, if any doubt arises with regard to the interpretation of the penal provision, the one not inflicting the penalty or deterrent may be preferred [Ref.: Maxwell's The Interpretation of Statutes, 12th edition (1969), State of AP Vs. Nagoti Venkataramana: (1996) 6 SCC 409, CCE Vs. Oriental Fabrics (P) Ltd: (2004) 1 SCC 597, CIT V. JDS Apparels (P) Ltd: 370 ITR 454 (Del)].

Although, the definition of "Commissioner" as provided under Section 2 clause 16 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, includes Commissioner of Income Tax, Director of Income Tax, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Principal Director of Income Tax Act, 1961 in its ambit, still these terms cannot be used interchangeably and the power delegated to one class of officers has to be exercised by that class of officers only.  The Legislature has made fine distinction between the authorities constituted under the Income Tax Act which is evident from the nomenclatures used in the sections mentioned herein below:

Under

  • Section 127 uses both the expressions Principal Chief Commissioner or Commissioner as well as Principal Director General or Director General;
  • Sections 132, 132A and 133A uses the expressions Principal Director General or Director General or Principal Director or Director or Principal Chief Commissioner of Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner;
  • Various sections in Chapter XIV relating to procedure for assessment unless uses the expressions Commissioner or Principal Commissioner and not the expressions Director of Principal Director [refer sections 151, 153A, 153B and 153C, etc.];
  • Chapter XX relating to appeals and revision also uses the expression Principal Commissioner or Commissioner and not the expression Principal Director or Director;

On perusal of the aforesaid, it will clearly emerge that the Legislature has consciously, whether deem fit and appropriate, either used both the expressions, i.e. "Director" and "Commissioner" and certain provisions only uses one of the expression, depending upon the nature and scope of power to be exercised. The aforesaid expressions are not used interchangeably by the Legislature and therefore use of the one of the expression would not necessarily mean that the other authority has also been granted power under the relevant provision.

It is important to note that section 2 clearly provides for application of definitions contained therein unless the "context otherwise requires". Meaning thereby the definition given in section 2 cannot, ipso facto, be applied to various provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and it is incumbent to see the context of the relevant provisions before importing/ applying the definition clause.

It is a well settled law that it cannot be contended that expression as defined in the interpretation clause would necessarily carry the same meaning throughout the Statute. [Ref.: (K. Balarishna Rao V. Haji Abdulla Sait: (1980) 1 SCC 321), (Printers (Mysore) Ltd Vs. ACTO: (1994) 2 SCC 434), (State of Maharashtra Vs. IMA: (2002) 1 SCC 589), (Dr. Nalini Mahajan Vs. DIT (Inv): 257 ITR 123 {Del}].

In the case of Dr. Nalini Mahajan vs. DIT (Inv) [Ref.: 257 ITR 123(Del)], the issue before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court was whether Additional Director had the authority to authorize search under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Hon'ble Court while deciding the present case observed following things:

Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provided that the Director General or Director or the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner or such Joint Director or Joint Commissioner as may be empowered by the board to authorize search and seizure operation.

Section 2(21) defined expression Director General or Director to include Additional Director or Joint Director. Based on the said definition clause, it was the case of the Revenue that Additional Director is also competent to authorize search under section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Hon'ble Court after elaborating considering the entire scheme held that statutory power under section 132(1) must be exercised by the authority who has expressly been conferred therein.

The relevant points that arises out from the judgment are as under:

"In terms of sub-section (1) of section 132 of the Act, a statutory power has been conferred upon the authorities specified therein.

  • Such statutory power must be exercised by the authority who has expressly been conferred therewith.
  • The provisions of the Income-tax Act clearly envisage a hierarchy of officers.
  • Had the intention of Parliament been to confer the power of issuing authorization or warrant upon all the officers, who come within the purview of the interpretation clause of "Director" or "Director-General", it was not necessary to mention therein the Director or the Director-General or the Chief Commissioner of the Commissioner or any such Joint Director or Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, empowered in this behalf by the Board, inasmuch as the latter authorities would have also come within the purview of the definition of Director-General or Director. 

Parliament has used the article "the" before the authority specified for exercising this statutory power. If a broad meaning as contained in section 2(21) of the Act is assigned to the definition of "Director", the authorizing officer and the Assessing Officer, although they may be different persons, would come within the purview thereof, which could never be the intention of the Legislature. Furthermore, had the Additional Director been covered within the purview of the definition of Director-General or Director, there was no necessity of defining Joint Director again, as has been done in section 2(28D) of the Act in terms whereof also a Joint Director would be an Additional Director.

  • An interpretation clause is not a positive enactment. An interpretation clause, having regard to its limited operation, must be given a limited effect.

While giving effect thereto, the court must not forget that the scope and object of such a provision is subject to its applicability having relation to the context only. Notification bearing NO.703E dated September 6, 1989, only empowers the Director of Investigation to issue authorization for search and seizure operations all over India. A statutory power is conferred by the Board in favour of a particular statutory authority. 

  • The scope and purport of the said definition, cannot be extended to other authorities in whose favour the power has not been delegated. It is not in dispute that the Additional Director is also lower in rank than the Director.
  • It is well settled that when a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain manner, the same must be done in that manner or not at all.
  • A delegation of power is essentially a legislative function. Such a power of delegation must be provided for by the statute. The Director himself for certain matters is the delegating authority.  He, unless the statute expressly states, cannot sub-delegate his power to any other authority. The Additional Director (Investigation) does not have power to authorize the Joint Director to issue a warrant. The aforesaid decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has been followed in the case of CIT Vs. Jainson: 222 CTR 34 (Del)."

Section 279 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 mandates that a person shall not proceeded against for an offence as mentioned in the section therein, except that the provisions sanctions sanction of, "the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) or the appropriate authority. Proviso to sub-section (1) of section 279 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 further provides that the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or, as the case may be, Principal Director General or Director General may issue instructions to the income tax authority specified in sub-section (1) for institution of prosecution proceedings.

In light of the above discussion, it is apparent that sub-section (1) of section 279 of the Income tax Act, 1961 only authorizes Principal Commissioner or Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) or the appropriate authority, as authorities competent to grant section for institution of prosecution proceedings.

© 2016, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Vijay Pal Dalmia, Partner
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions