India: Court Allows Presence Of Advocate During Recording Of Statement By Director General, Competition Commission Of India

In the last seven years, India's fair trade regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has handed down over seven hundred orders. There is hardly any order which has been struck down by the Competition Appellate Tribunal, an appellate body or any Court on merits of substantive assessment. However, plenty of its orders are facing challenges in various Courts including the Competition Appellate Tribunal on peripheral issues/grounds mainly (a) pre mature or incorrect exercise of jurisdiction, (b) decisions taken by those who have not heard the parties, (c) not affording the charged party an opportunity to defend itself, especially when CCI is in disagreement with the findings of DG, an investigative arm of CCI,  (d) DG overstepping the scope of its investigation, (e) DG not affording opportunity to cross examine the witness whose statement is relied upon, and (f) not permitting an Advocate to accompany the deponent during the recording of his/her statement on oath at the investigation stage. Admittedly all these pitfalls hover around the basic tenet of adjudication namely due process, procedural fairness, both flowing from principles of natural justice (PNJs). These are avoidable as well as curable.

In order to carry out the purposes of the Act, the CCI1 as well DG have been conferred with sweeping powers. The CCI can institute an inquiry either suo motu or on information from any person or on reference from State/Statutory Authority2. The CCI is not obliged to hear the alleged charged party before formation of prima facie opinion3 and consequent initiation of an Inquiry. Institution of Inquiry relating to anti competitive agreement or abuse of dominance (ACA/AOD) mandates CCI to refer the matter to Director General for carrying out investigation and to submit Investigation Report within the given time. In order to stay clear and to ensure independence and impartiality in investigation, the CCI in its directions makes clear that nothing stated in prima facie order shall tantamount to final expression of opinion on the merits of the case and DG shall conduct its investigation without being swayed in any manner whatsoever by the observations made in the prima facie order.

Thus carriage of investigation by Director General, submission of Investigation report and sharing of same with the parties are vital compartments of an inquiry. In the last seven years of enforcement journey of provisions of ACA/AOD in India, it is noticed that CCI has by and large agreed with the findings contained in investigation report of DG and wherever CCI did not agree with the findings of DG, in most such cases, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, on appeal, has either dismissed the order of the CCI or has remitted the matter back to CCI for reconsideration. All these demonstrate that the report of DG is the foundation, beside being a precursor to CCI's order/directions4.

Noting the importance and recognizing that the DG has a daunting task of fact finding, the law empowers him with the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while trying a suit, namely (a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him oath; (b) requiring the discovery and ;(c) receiving evidence on affidavits; (d) issuing commissions for the examination of documents; and (e) requisitioning public records (subject to certain conditions).   In addition, the DG has been conferred with power to undertake search and seizure of course subject to prescribed checks5 and such a hard approach has been invoked in one case since the enforcement of the law in India.

Generally, the DG adopts two pronged soft approach namely collecting/ collating the information from the parties including third parties and public records, if any and recording of the statement of identified persons conversant with the matter under investigation. The information/documents filed by parties do help the Investigator in better understanding of the case including background, regulatory provisions and the issues involved. Though these submissions/responses filed are expected to be comprehensive and truthful, yet neither these are verified much less supported by a personal affidavit of the authorized person.  

In order to check the veracity of the submissions, to have revealed the information to which the deponent has privy either in personal or official capacity, to unearth the business conducts practised but not documented, to fathom the gravity and magnitude of violations, the DG invariably summons the directors and others officers well versed with the business of charged party to tender evidence by way of recording of their statement. It is all in the domain of the DG to decide as to who is to be summoned (notwithstanding whether based out of India or abroad), when a person is be called and what questions are to responded by the deponent.

Undeniably antitrust issues are highly complex and a violation of the law triggers serious adverse sanctions and deterrent penalties. Therefore, due process and procedural fairness are the hallmark of sound and sustainable competition regime. The principles of natural justice mandate that no person should be condemned unheard. Right of being heard includes right of being represented by an attorney of choice. However, the Director General for last few years was disallowing advocates/lawyers to accompany the deponent and thus, statement of individuals were being recorded in the absence of lawyers. It is important to note that it was in the interest of the DG that the advocate is present during the deposition. An advocate can also be a witness to recorded statement and witness to the fact that neither coercion nor undue influence was exerted on a deponent during the course of the recording. This would make it difficult for a deponent to retract his statement and make false claims and therefore, the DG should have happily allowed the presence of an Advocate but the  practice of recording statement of deponent without Attorney was unscrupulously followed especially when deposition is of an authorized person of charged party.

Despite the explicit mandate on the CCI to abide by the principles of natural justice and that an enterprise has the right to be represented by an authorized Attorney,6 the DG's office which is to conduct investigation for and on behalf of CCI, was not adhering to this mandate of the law.  In this context, the observations of Lord Denning would be relevant and useful

              "Once it is seen that a man has a right to appear by an agent, then I see no reason why that agent should not be a lawyer. It is not every man who has the ability to defend himself on his own. He cannot bring out the points in his own favour or the weaknesses in the other side. He may be tongue-tied or nervous, confused or wanting in intelligence. He cannot examine or cross-examine witnesses. We see it every day. A magistrate says to a man: 'You can ask any questions you like'; whereupon the man immediately starts to make a speech. If justice is to be done, he ought to have the help of someone to speak for him; and who better than a lawyer who has been trained for the task? I should have thought, therefore, that when a man's reputation or livelihood is at stake, he not only has a right to speak by his own mouth. He also has a right to speak by counsel or solicitor."

An advocate is an officer of the Court and is in fact mandated to assist the Court7. He is also the voice of others and he owes a variety of obligations to his/her client as well as the society at large. The question of arbitrary, unreasonable, unwritten practice of not allowing authorized advocate to accompany the deponent during the course of recording of statement by the DG, came up for consideration and fortunately it has very recently been settled by the High Court of Delhi8.  In support of rationale for not permitting Advocate at the stage of recording of statement in an ongoing investigation, the CCI/DG came up inter-alia with following arguments:

  1. That the Competition Act belongs to the family of legislation which deals with economic offences such as Foreign Exchange Regulation Act etc and Courts have consistently held that a person who is called to give his statement by way of evidence cannot insist as a matter of right that he be accompanied by a lawyer;
  2. That the person who is called to give his statement is not an accused and the question of his self incrimination would not arise;
  3. Larger public interest calls for expeditious investigation; 
  4. That the CCI is not barring advocates from practicing before it but a person being investigated has no right to be represented by an advocate during investigation when there is only a fact finding.

         The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi found it difficult to accept the arguments put forth by the CCI/DG and noted that:

  1. The powers of the DG during such investigation are far more sweeping and wider than the power of investigation conferred on Police under the Code of Criminal Procedure Code.  While the Police has no power to record evidence on oath but the DG has been vested with such a power; and
  2. It is no answer that no prejudice would be caused to the person/enterprise being investigated. The credibility and competitive position of a public company is affected in the business world even though in the end it may be completely exonerated.

In addition, the High Court took note that the Advocate Act, 1961 confers a right to practice on Advocates and it provides that every advocate shall be entitled to practice throughout India in all Courts and Tribunals or before person legally authorized to take evidence9. It further said that right to practice would include accompanying a person who has been summoned before the DG for investigation.

In view of court ruling against which no appeal has been filed before the Supreme Court, it is believed that henceforth, the DG and the Attorney representing a party to the proceedings will work in tandem, not protract the proceedings and will ensure that innocent is not punished and violator is not spared.


* Partner & Head of Competition Law Practice, Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, New Delhi.  He is a former Additional Director General , Competition Commission of India/Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Commission, Government of India. The views of the author are personal. The author can be reached at

© copyright reserved.

2 Section 36- Power to regulate its own procedure beside powers as are vested in a Court while trying a suit

32 Section 19- Inquiry into certain agreements and dominant position of enterprise.

4 Supreme Court in the matter of CCI vs Steel Authority of India.

5 Section 27 lays down orders after inquiry into agreements or abuse of dominant position.  These include direction to cease and desist beside imposition of monetary penalty.

6 Section 41 of the Competition Act, 2002.

7 Section 35- Appearance before Commission

8 Obligation cast by the Bar Counsel of India.

9 Order of 22nd April, 2016 in WP© 11411/2015 & CM No. 30075/2015 in the matter of Oriental Rubber Industries Private Limited Vs. CCI

10 Section 30

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.