India: Evolving Arbitration Law: Exclusion Or Inclusion Of Part I

Last Updated: 2 June 2016
Article by Ritesh Singh


On January 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict in a case, which is actually a spin-off of the landmark case of Bharat Aluminium Company ("Balco") vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC. ("Kaiser") ("Balco I")1, which overruled Bhatia International vs. Bulk Trading SA.2 Balco I laid down that Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "Act") does not apply to international commercial arbitrations held outside India, whereas Bhatia International held that Part I of the Act is also applicable to arbitrations outside India unless it is excluded, impliedly or expressly, by agreement. As Balco I was made prospective, the law laid down in Bhatia International still holds good for all arbitration agreements executed prior to September 12, 2012. The 2016 judgment ("Balco II")3 becomes important for all foreign parties, who want to escape the rigors of Part I by ensuring the seat of arbitration is outside India and where governing law is foreign. Balco II applies to pre September 12, 2012 agreements as well.

This newsletter seeks to analyze the 2016 ruling and suggests the method by which foreign party can avail the benefit of Balco II and Part I.

1. Part I Controversy

The real question is why Part I is so important in arbitration. In this context, it is necessary to examine some important provisions, described in brief: (a) section 9 gives the option to the parties to approach the court for interim relief in order to secure the amount or property in dispute; (b) section 11 gives the parties the right to approach court for appointment of arbitrator in case one party fails to act in terms of the arbitration agreement pertaining to the appointment; and (c) section 27 gives power to the parties to apply to the court for taking its assistance during evidence. Another important provision of Part I is section 34, which has actually been the catalyst for the birth of Balco I and Balco II. Section 34 provides the conditions on the basis of which an award can be set aside. There are several conditions including, amongst others, incapacity of party to execute an arbitration agreement, absence of proper notice of arbitrator's appointment or of proceedings, award is on a subject which cannot be arbitrated and the award is contrary to public policy.

So, why does Part I have so much significance?

As observed from foregoing, despite an agreement to arbitrate, Part I enables parties to approach courts for interim remedies and more importantly, given the plethora of judgments, well reasoned awards have been subjected to challenge under section 34, thereby mocking the entire arbitration process. In contrast, a party can challenge a foreign award in Indian courts under sections 48 and 57 on only two grounds: (a) foreign award is contrary to public policy and/or (b) subject-matter of the dispute was not capable of settlement through arbitration.

In order to minimize challenges to an award under section 34, after Balco I, foreign parties preferred and negotiated to have the seat of arbitration outside India in international commercial transactions. The flip side, of course, was that when Part I was specially excluded, parties were unable to secure any kind of interim relief from Indian courts. By means of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 20154 (the "Amendment Act"), a new proviso has now been added to section 2 of the Act, whereby a narrow option has been provided for a foreign party for availing interim relief against an Indian party even in the foreign seated arbitration. This amendment ensures that contracting parties can carve out an exception to the blanket exclusion of Part I to the arbitral proceedings where the venue is outside India. In effect, this will provide an option to those parties who wish to apply to the Indian courts for interim relief where it is necessary to secure something rapidly.

2. Balco II Facts

Balco and Kaiser entered into an agreement on April 22, 1993 (the "Agreement"), whereby Kaiser was required to provide equipment to Balco and to upgrade and modernize its production facilities. As a dispute arose between both the companies, the matter went for arbitration. Dispute resolution clauses in the Agreement, Articles 17.1 and 22, provided as follows: (a) Article 17.1 required parties to try to settle matters amicably and, in case of failure, resolve through arbitration, which was governed by English law; and (b) according to Article 22, the governing law of the contract was Indian, while substantive law of arbitration was English. Thus, seemingly the parties intended to have two different governing laws, one for the contract and the second for arbitration. Pursuant to Articles 17.1 and 22 of the Agreement, the arbitration proceedings were held in London in accordance with English law.

The arbitral tribunal passed two awards dated November 10, 2002 and November 12, 2002, (the "Awards") which were in favour of Kaiser. Aggrieved by the Awards, Balco filed applications under section 34 of the Act before the district court of Bilaspur, which dismissed them. This dismissal led Balco to file appeals under section 37 of the Act before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which were also dismissed. Challenging the High Court's dismissals, Balco preferred a special leave petition5 before the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

The main issue to be determined before the Supreme Court was whether parties agreed to exclude application of Part I, wholly or partly, to the Agreement. In effect, the challenge to the award was under section 34 which came within Part I. In order to determine this, the Supreme Court discussed Articles 17.1 and 22 of the Agreement so as to determine applicable governing law for arbitration. It stressed upon the phrase "pursuant to" in Article 17.1 and observed that arbitration is required to be conducted in accordance with English law as the phrase "pursuant to" means "in accordance with" or "in conformity with". Thereafter, it took the position that parties intended to have arbitration governed by English law, which fact was stated both in the arbitral clause and even in the second limb of the governing law clause of the Agreement. It expressly stated:

"The terms of the contract will have to be understood in the way the parties wanted and intended them to be. In that context, particularly in agreements of arbitration, where party autonomy is the grundnorm, how the parties worked out the agreement, is one of the indicators to decipher the intention, apart from the plain or grammatical meaning of the expressions and the use of the expressions at the proper places in the agreement. Contextually, it may be noted that in the present case, the respondent had invoked the provisions of English law for the purpose of the initiation of the unsettled disputes"

3. Part I: Inclusion or Exclusion

While examining the application of exclusion of Part I, the Supreme Court considered earlier jurisprudence as well. In Videocon Industries Limited v. Union of India ("UoI")6, the Supreme Court was required to decide whether application of section 9 filed by UoI before the High Court of Delhi was maintainable in view of the fact that governing law for arbitration was English law. This issue was decided against UoI because the court took the view that Part I is excluded as arbitration was governed by foreign law in that case. Similarly, in Yograj Infrastructure Limited v. Ssang Yong Engineering and Construction Co. Limited7, the Supreme Court took the view that where SIAC rules apply contractually to the arbitration proceedings, parties cannot apply to court for appointment of arbitrator and, therefore, rejected an application under section 11.

In 2014, in Reliance Industries Limited v. Union of India8, the Supreme Court yet again had to determine the issue of Part I where governing law was foreign law and it observed as under:

"The provisions of the Part I of the Arbitration Act 1996 (India) are necessarily excluded; being wholly inconsistent with the arbitration agreement which provides "that arbitration agreement shall be governed by English law." Thus the remedy of the Respondent to challenge any award rendered in the arbitration proceedings would lie under the relevant provisions contained in Arbitration Act, 1996 of England and Wales"

The above precedents were also followed in Union of India v. Reliance Industries Limited9. The Supreme Court observed that when venue of arbitration is outside India and governing law is non-Indian, Part I is excluded. As a consequence, it decided the main issue in favour of Kaiser and held that Balco cannot challenge the award under section 34 before Indian courts for the reason that Part I is impliedly excluded as law governing the arbitration in London was English law.


Flowing from the above it seems that the intent of the highest court is that where the governing law of arbitration is non-Indian and proceedings take place outside India, an award in such cases cannot be challenged under Part I. Where the governing law is Indian and arbitration is conducted outside India, Part I will apply. It is important for contracting parties to take dispute resolution and governing law clauses very seriously and not treat them as boiler plate.

At the end, what matters is not to have an award, but to have an enforceable award so that the winning party gets the necessary relief. In a rush to exclude Part I, contracting parties should not disregard where and how enforcement will be speedy. Balco I, Balco II and other judgments discussed above assert the need of specific attention to dispute resolution clauses, which should be drafted with utmost care and after taking various factors into consideration, such as location of movable and immovable properties, including bank accounts.


1 (2012) 9 SCC 552

2 (2002) 4 SCC 105

3 (2016) 4 SCC 126

4 The Amendment Act introduced some much needed changes to the Act, which came in force from October 23, 2015.

5 The Indian constitution provides that Supreme Court may permit any person to appeal and challenge any order of the High Court even if the appeal against such order of the High Court is not provided for in any act or law.

6 (2011) 6 SCC 161

7 (2011) 9 SCC 735

8 (2014) 7 SCC 603

9 2015 (10) SCALE 149

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Vaish Associates Advocates
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Vaish Associates Advocates
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions