Worldwide: Havana Club Rum: Case Analysis

Last Updated: 29 March 2016
Article by Divya Srinivasan

The Havana Club trademark dispute1 between United States and Cuba has been one of the most prolonging, controversial and potentially acrimonious cases for the World Trade Organization (WTO) till date. In this case Cubaexport (official name being Empresa Cubana Exportadora de Alimentos y Productos Varios) and French firm Pernod Ricard, jointly owning two corporations, i.e., Havana Club Holding, S.A. and Havana Club International S.A., (hereinafter, the Plaintiffs) sued Galleon S.A., Bacardi-Martini USA Inc., Gallo Wine Distributors, Inc., G.W.D. Holdings, Inc. and Premier Wine and Spirits (hereinafter, the Defendants), in 1996 at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claiming trademark infringement regarding the use of the famous Havana Club mark.

Factual matrix:

The Cuban corporation José Arechabala S.A. (JASA), owned and controlled by the Arechabala family until 1960, held the Havana club trademark, manufactured the rum in Cuba, and sold it in Cuba and overseas. Prior to the Cuban Revolution in 1959, Havana Club was one of the largest and popular selling rums in the world, with the United States being the major buyer. In early 1960, the Cuban government forcibly seized all of JASA's assets and property without an offer to repay or compensate them. Pernod-Ricard, French international spirits company, decided to enter into a joint venture agreement with a Cuban State-owned entity for the distribution and marketing of rum under the name of Havana Club.

In 1963, the United States imposed a restraint on Cuba through the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR). In 1996, the United States Congress enacted the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act (LIBERTAD) which codified the regulations implementing the Cuban restraint. Cubaexports, a state-owned enterprise, exported Havana Club rum, primarily to the Soviet Union from 1972 to 1993. They had registered the 'Havana Club' trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in 1976. Cubaexport decided to seek a foreign partner for its Havana Club rum business in 1993; in this regard, Havana Rum & Liquors, S.A. (HR&L) was formed under the Cuban laws.

Consequently, HR&L entered into a joint venture agreement, which formed Havana Club Holding, S.A. (HCH), a Luxemburg Corporation, and Havana Club International, S.A. (HCI), a Cuban corporation. Cubaexport then assigned its U.S. trademarks to HR&L, which in turn assigned them to HCH in 1994. HCH renewed the U.S. registration for the 'Havana Club' mark for a term of ten years in 1996. In 1996, Bacardi & Co. Ltd., a Bermudan corporation, and Bacardi-Martini USA Inc., a Delaware corporation (collectively 'Bacardi') began to sell Havana club-labelled rum in USA, made in Bahamas, which Galleon S.A., predecessor-in-interest sold in 1995. Bacardi also bought whatever rights it had to the 'Havana Club' mark from the Arechabala family in April 1997. Eventually, Pernod-Ricard through HCH and HCI filed a suit with the US Southern District Court of New York, seeking an injunction against Bacardi and an enforcement of its 'Havana Club' trademark in the US. This stemmed out of the belief that protection of rights in the US market would help as and when the 40 year Cuban restraint was lifted.

During this time, a new twist in the form of 'Omnibus Appropriations Act, 1998' (OAA) came up, specifically focussing on Section 211. This came up as a result of heavy lobbying by Bacardi and was designed in order to prevent Pernod-Ricard from being able to enforce its rights to the trademark 'Havana Club' in the US. Section 211 of the OAA deals with trademarks, trade names, and commercial names which are similar or substantially similar to trademarks, trade names and commercial names used in connection with businesses or assets sequestered by the Cuban Government on or after July 1, 1959. This intended to prevent the registration and enforcement in US of trademarks requisitioned by Cuba. It is assumed that this provision was crafted specially to prove the US position before the WTO.

Dispute before the WTO

After much deliberation the district Court ruled against HCH and HCI in June 1999, further to which the European Union (EU) requested sessions under the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing Settlement of Disputes (DSU) at WTO. These consultations occurred between EU and US between September – December 1999. In February 2000, the Second Circuit issued its ruling upholding the District Court decision. Despite various consultations, EU and the US were unable to come to agreeable terms. Therefore in June 2000, EU requested the establishment of a Panel under Article 6 of the DSU and Article 64.1 of the TRIPS Agreement, alleging that Section 211 of the OAA was in violation of the TRIPS Agreement. In November 2000, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) established a Panel to adjudicate the dispute and recommended that US bring its domestic legislation into conformity with its obligations under the TRIPS Agreement. US denied that Section 211 of the OAA was inconsistent with its obligations under the TRIPS Agreement and requested the Panel to reject the claims of the EU in their entirety. The Panel found only one violation, i.e. Article 42 of the TRIPS Agreement by the US, with EU losing 11 out of 12 arguments in their complaint. On a cross appeal by the EU against the US, the Appellate Body held that Section 211 was not in violation of the TRIPS Agreement representing a major victory for the US.

But the Appellate Body specifically stressed that Section 211 (a) (2) was inconsistent with National Treatment provision under Article 3.1 of the TRIPS Agreement and Article 2 (1) of Paris Convention, as well as the Most Favoured Nation provision under Article 4 of the TRIPS Agreement. The Appellate Body reiterated that the National Treatment and MFN are two of the most important principles under the international agreements for IPR. These two are imposed so as to obligate every country to comply with them.2 While the Panel had disagreed with this contention in their ruling, the Appellate Body reversed this and held that Sections 211 (a) (2) and (b) were discriminatory on their face and inconsistent with the obligations of the US under the TRIPS Agreement. Hence the Appellate Body concluded the following;

  • That Section 211 (a) (2) was in violation of National Treatment principle;
  • That Section 211 (a) (2) and (b) were in violation of national treatment with respect to owners;
  • That Section 211 (a) (2) and (b) were in violation of MFN with respect to both owners as well as successors-in-interest


The Appellate Body held WTO Members must comply with the TRIPS Agreement, through which all other Members are voluntarily bound.  A Member should not discriminate in a way that does not respect the obligations of national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment, both being fundamental to the TRIPS Agreement.3


1 European Communities vs United States (Appeal), WT/DS176/AB/R, January 2, 2002, WTO.

2 National Treatment is when member countries are to accord the same national treatment which is no less favourable than which it provides its own nationals with respect to intellectual property rights. The MFN principle requires each Member to grant nationals of other member countries any advantage, favour, privilege or immunity given to nationals of any country with regard to the protection of intellectual property rights.

3 Id at 1, ¶ 363.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Divya Srinivasan
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions