India: WIPO Asian Regional Symposium On The Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Rights

Last Updated: 16 June 1998
Organised by

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) in cooperation with the Intellectual Property Department of the Government of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Hong Kong, June 1 to 3, 1998

LITIGATION AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION FOR EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT.

By Pravin Anand - Anand & Anand

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 For a thousand years Europe has known trial by ordeal where innocence was determined by a mere ability to perform cruel tests such as walking barefoot on burning coal. Trial by battle was the next alternate where kings sent out their armies or champions and the winner would represent the truth. About 700 years ago a more humane form of dispute resolution emerged - trial by litigation.

1.2 In a world of cloning, lunar motels and cyberspace, does this make litigation old and obsolete or does it make it robust and time tested? The answer is probably a mix of both.

2. LITIGATION AND ADR

2.1 ADR means alternate to bringing a law suit although dispute resolution processes like Arbitration, mediation and mini trials may not necessarily be "alternate" to litigation. They are all tools available to a lawyer who can use them wisely to achieve creative solutions.

2.2 To define the terms in a simple sense:-

  • Negotiation is when the parties to a dispute talk it out.
  • Arbitration is when parties choose to have a neutral give a binding decision in relation to their dispute.
  • Expedited arbitration is another form of arbitration where the rules give the arbitrator broader powers to speed up the proceedings.
  • Mediation involves a neutral person who facilitates negotiations by helping the parties understand their interests in an informal, non confrontational way. The mediator cannot impose a settlement. This is particularly good where parties want to continue with their business relationship.
  • Mini trials are variations where parties present an abbreviated version of their case to neutrals for evaluation.
  • Mediation and default arbitration, is a combined procedure where the parties agree to refer their disputes to binding arbitration if their mediation efforts are not successful.
  • Expert determination is a system by which parties may agree that an expert's decision on some point, such as similarity of two computer programmes, may bind them.

2.3 ADR is consensual in nature which means that there must be an agreement between parties either before the dispute has arisen or even during litigation to have their dispute decided by a private forum.

The agreement provides parties with a lot of flexibility in terms of the procedure that they wish to apply, the law, the forum, language etc.

2.4 The crucial issue is why "ADR" or why "Arbitration" when there is a low cost state funded court system available as opposed to arbitration where parties have to pay the cost of the arbitrator which in some cases like ICC arbitration may be commensurate to the amount involved.

The advantages of arbitration are many:-

a) The most important reason is "time". In this world of Moores Law where computer costs half every 18 months because of doubling of computer speed, litigation life measured in years is totally unacceptable to industry. But then Arbitration may also take long time and for this reason the rules of the WIPO Centre on expedited arbitration are quite relevant.

b) On the whole, Arbitration costs lesser than litigation because of its final nature while in litigation appeals may rapidly multiply cost.

c) Another great advantage of Arbitration is that you can select your own arbitrator. This is particularly important in Patent, Trade Secret and High Technology cases where you can get an expert in the filed of your choice. You can always have a technical advisor in court proceedings but eventually the judge must understand the technology in order to apply it and even if he does so, he may lack the proper mind set to decide the matter.

d) Confidentiality is preserved so the fact that the proprietor of an Intellectual Property settled for a "lesser sum" with one infringer would remain a secret and not affect all other cases.

e) The International Character of IP Rights has made arbitration more attractive than multinational court litigation.

For example, Domain name cases where some consent has been obtained as a condition of registration are best decided by mediation or arbitration. Litigation can fail due to complex jurisdictional issues or there may be contradictory judgements in different courts.

f) The other great advantage of Arbitration is that Arbitral Awards are enforceable in many countries under the New York Convention (115 countries) while court judgements are not.

g) The fact that a Party can choose its own judge, forum and choice of law makes it more business like. Parties do not like to suffer the severe disadvantage of suing in another country with a totally alien legal culture. It is perceived that foreign courts do not understand foreign concepts and foreign ways of doing things.

h) Another reason which favours ADR as a whole is that the ongoing relationship between parties may be embittered and destroyed by litigation while it is likely to be preserved in the case of ADR.

2.5 Having said this, let us see the advantages of litigation:

a) There is a perception that agreeing to ADR would be seen as a sign of weakness. Consequently, where there is wilful infringement and a need to send a strong signal that nothing less than full victory would do - Litigation is a preferred option.

b) The precedent value of Litigation is its main strength . Thus in the software industry in USA there has been a lot of Thematic Litigation to determine fundamental paradigms that may define competition in future. The "look and feel" cases and the "Abstraction - Filtration - Comparison" test are examples of this.

As opposed to this, Arbitration awards are not published and have no precedent value. The converse argument is that if the decision is a negative one it could act as a road map for infringers.

c) Judges are subjected to the discipline of statutory procedural rules, Evidence Act and a structure of appeals. As opposed to this, arbitrators enjoy a lot more freedom and in certain situations, this may not be desirable.

d) Another great strength of litigation is the fact that the courts are great at granting interim orders. In some countries, arbitrators do not have this power and even if they do, it leads to practical problems. If an arbitrator refuses interim relief because he does not wish to prejudge the issue, courts are reluctant to grant relief on the ground that a competent tribunal is seized with the matter and if it has refused the relief there must be a good reason for doing so.

Considering that in some countries interim relief of injunction, Anton Piller Orders, Mareva Injunctions and Norwich Pharmacal Orders are practically the main thing (with little or no possibility of damages being granted) this can be a major problem.

The time lost in appointing an arbitrator may be too late where immediate relief is desired. The WIPO Supplementary Emergency Interim Relief Rules provide for an emergency arbitrator available on 24 hours notice who can convene ex parte hearings and make ex parte awards.

2.6 Some of the main issues relating to Arbitration are as follows:-

a) An award, unlike an IP right is in personam and can only bind the parties. Under the laws of some countries a distinction is made between disputes relating to the validity of an IP right and disputes relating to existence or ownership of the right. It is felt that disputes of the latter kind are good subject matter for arbitration while arbitration may not apply where the grant of a registration is involved because these are acts of a sovereign power. It is only the sovereign power which can adjudicate regarding validity and adjudication and the adjudication by a private tribunal simply has no effect.

In recent years most countries have liberalised their thinking. Some countries like France and Japan qualify arbitrability on public policy grounds permitting only those matters to be referred which can be lawfully compromised by the parties. Others like the US have a more liberal approach and disputes with regard to ownership, validity and infringement of patents and trade marks can be arbitrated.

b) Enforceability of awards is another issue as the steps that need to be taken vary from country to country. In some countries like USA, Switzerland and India, an award must be filed with the court and a judgement would make the award a rule of the court. In countries like England and China there is no need to file the award or register it.

2.7 Mediation is quite successful in trade mark conflicts where creative business driven solutions are possible such as addition of a House Mark or slight change in the mark or confining the mark to a different trade channel.

A variation to litigation is an expedited trial procedure known in India. The judge can persuade the defendant at the plaintiffs' suggestion to record evidence before a court appointed official. Normal trial may take five years but this procedure is known to reduce the period to as short a term as six months to one year. Once evidence is recorded, it is the court who decides the dispute but effectively the bottleneck due to the courts cluttered diary is overcome.

In a court proceedings where the plaintiff seeks an Anton Piller Order, a court official or independent solicitor can be appointed to give a neutral fact finding on some issue. The report of the neutral is almost impregnable and often catalyses a settlement.

3. CONCLUSION

Any person involved in the enforcement of IP rights must familiarise himself with these invaluable tools of Arbitration and Mediation.

It is ideal to include a multi step process in contracts, so that there is a "back up" technique if one fails to achieve the desired results.

The message is best put in the words of Abraham Lincoln " "You should discourage litigation. You should persuade your neighbours to compromise whenever you can. You should point out to them that a nominal winner is often a loser - in fees, in expenses and it is a waste of time".

The emphasis on the adversarial approach should be diluted as justice thrives best in a system founded on compromise, negotiation and mutual understanding rather than hostility and acrimony.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

HEAD OFFICE ADDRESS:   1, Jaipur Estate
                       Nizamuddin East
                       New Delhi- 110013

Tel:     (91 11) 4619639; (91 11) 4615833; (91 11) 4623148;
         (91 11) 4641749; (91 11) 4645067; (91 11) 4645078

Fax:     (91 11) 4624243; (91 11) 4642060; (91 11) 3325045

E-mail:   Click Contact Link 

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions